Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-03-2010 | Original Article

Relational framework improves transitive inference across age groups

Auteurs: Sandra N. Moses, Melanie L. Ostreicher, Jennifer D. Ryan

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 2/2010

Abstract

Transitive inference is a complex task, conducive to the use of multiple strategies. We investigated whether transitive inference accuracy can be improved by biasing strategy choice towards a proposition-based approach that relies on the extraction of relations among stimuli. We biased strategy choice by using familiar stimuli with known relations that tap prior knowledge. Semantic information led to increased accuracy for younger and older adults, and increased awareness of stimulus relations. Increased age was associated with reduced awareness. Awareness accounted for the variability in performance accuracy to a greater extent than age, as aware older and younger adults showed similar accuracies on all conditions. The current work indicates that age differences in performance can be minimized by providing semantically meaningful stimuli that bias participants to use a relational proposition-based approach.

vorige artikel Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines

volgende artikel Category label and response location shifts in category learning

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Acuna, B. D., Eliassen, J. C., Donoghue, J. P., & Sanes, J. N. (2002). Frontal and parietal lobe activation during transitive inference in humans. Cerebral Cortex (New York), 12, 1312–1321. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.12.1312.CrossRef

Castel, A. D. (2005). Memory for grocery prices in younger and older adults: The role of schematic support. Psychology and Aging, 20, 718–721. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.718.CrossRefPubMed

Driscoll, I., Hamilton, D. A., Petropoulos, H., Yeo, R. A., Brooks, W. M., Baumgartner, R. N., et al. (2003). The aging hippocampus: Cognitive, biochemical and structural findings. Cerebral Cortex (New York), 13, 1344–1351. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhg081.CrossRef

Driscoll, I., & Sutherland, R. J. (2005). The aging hippocampus: Navigating between rat and human experiments. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 16, 87–121.PubMed

Dusek, J. A., & Eichenbaum, H. (1997). The hippocampus and memory for orderly stimulus relations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 7109–7114. doi:10.1073/pnas.94.13.7109.CrossRefPubMed

Fersen, L., Wynne, C. D. L., Delius, J. D., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1991). Transitive inference formation in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 17, 334–341. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.17.3.334.CrossRef

Frank, M. J., O’Reilly, R. C., & Curran, T. (2006). When memory fails, intuition reigns: Midazolam enhances implicit inference in humans. Psychological Science, 17, 700–707. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01769.x.CrossRefPubMed

Frank, M. J., O’Reilly, R. C., & Curran, T. (2008). Midazolam, hippocampal function, and transitive inference: Reply to Greene. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4, 5. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-4-5.CrossRefPubMed

Frank, M. J., Rudy, J. W., Levy, W. B., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2005). When logic fails: Implicit transitive inference in humans. Memory & Cognition, 33, 742–750.

Frank, M. J., Rudy, J. W., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2003). Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations and the hippocampus. II. A computational analysis. Hippocampus, 13, 341–354. doi:10.1002/hipo.10084.CrossRefPubMed

Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2004). By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science, 306, 1940–1943. doi:10.1126/science.1102941.CrossRefPubMed

Goodwin, G. P., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (2005). Reasoning about relations. Psychological Review, 112, 468–495. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.468.CrossRefPubMed

Grady, C. L., & Craik, F. I. M. (2000). Changes in memory processing with age. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 10, 224–231. doi:10.1016/S0959-4388(00)00073-8.CrossRefPubMed

Grady, C. L., McIntosh, A. R., & Craik, F. I. M. (2003). Age-related differences in the functional connectivity of the hippocampus during memory encoding. Hippocampus, 13, 572–586. doi:10.1002/hipo.10114.CrossRefPubMed

Greene, A. J., Gross, W. L., Elsinger, C., & Rao, S. M. (2006). An fMRI analysis of the human hippocampus: Inference, context and task awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 1156–1173. doi:10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1156.CrossRefPubMed

Greene, A. J., Spellman, B. A., Dusek, J. A., Eichenbuam, H. B., & Levy, W. B. (2001). Relational learning with and without awareness: Transitive inference using nonverbal stimuli in humans. Memory & Cognition, 29, 893–902.

Hannon, B., & Craik, F. I. M. (2001). Encoding specificity revisited: The role of semantics. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 231–243. doi:10.1037/h0087369.PubMed

Heckers, S., Zalesak, M., Weiss, A. P., Ditman, T., & Titone, D. (2004). Hippocampal activation during transitive inference in humans. Hippocampus, 14, 153–162. doi:10.1002/hipo.10189.CrossRefPubMed

Howard, D. V. (1983). The effects of aging and degree of association on the semantic priming of lexical decisions. Experimental Aging Research, 9, 145–151.PubMed

Libben, M., & Titone, D. (2008). The role of awareness and working memory in human transitive inference. Behavioural Processes, 77, 43–54. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2007.06.006.CrossRefPubMed

Martin, N., & Alsop, B. (2004). Transitive inference and awareness in humans. Behavioural Processes, 67, 157–165. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2004.03.017.CrossRefPubMed

McDonald, R. J., & White, N. M. (1995). Hippocampal and nonhippocampal contributions to place learning in rats. Behavioral Neuroscience, 109, 579–593. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.109.4.579.CrossRefPubMed

Moses, S. N., Villate, C., Binns, M. A., Davidson, P. S. R., & Ryan, J. D. (2008). Cognitive integrity predicts transitive inference performance bias and success. Neuropsychologia, 46, 1314–1325. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.12.009.CrossRefPubMed

Moses, S. N., Villate, C., & Ryan, J. D. (2006). An investigation of learning strategy underlying transitive inference performance in humans. Neuropsychologia, 44, 1370–1387. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.004.CrossRefPubMed

Nagode, J. C., & Pardo, J. V. (2002). Human hippocampal activation during transitive inference. Learning & Memory, 13, 939–944.

Ryan, J. D., Leung, G., Turk-Browne, N. B., & Hasher, L. (2007). Assessment of age-related changes in inhibition and binding using eye movement monitoring. Psychology and Aging, 22, 239–250. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.22.2.239.CrossRefPubMed

Ryan, J. D., Moses, S. N., & Villate, C. V. (2009). Impaired relational organization of propositions, but intact transitive inference, in aging: Implications for understanding underlying neural integrity. Neuropsychologia, 47, 338–353.CrossRefPubMed

Smith, C., & Squire, L. R. (2005). Declarative memory, awareness, and transitive inference. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 10138–10146. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2731-05.2005.CrossRefPubMed

Troyer, A. K., Hafliger, A., Cadieux, M. J., & Craik, F. I. M. (2006). Name and face learning in older adults: Effects of level of processing, self-generation, and intention to learn. The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 67–74.

Tse, D., Langston, R. F., Kakeyama, M., Bethus, I., Spooner, P. A., Wood, E. R., et al. (2007). Schemas and memory consolidation. Science, 316, 76–82. doi:10.1126/science.1135935.CrossRefPubMed

Van Elzakker, M., O’Reilly, R. C., & Rudy, J. W. (2003). Transitivity, flexibility, conjunctive representations and the hippocampus. I. An empirical analysis. Hippocampus, 13, 334–340. doi:10.1002/hipo.10083.CrossRefPubMed

Waltz, J. A., Knowlton, B. J., Holyoak, K. J., Boon, K. B., Mishkin, F. S., de Menezes Santos, M., et al. (1999). A system for relational reasoning in human prefrontal cortex. Psychological Science, 10, 119–125. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00118.CrossRef

Winocur, G. (1992). Conditional learning in aged rats: evidence of hippocampal and prefrontal cortex impairment. Neurobiology of Aging, 13, 131–135. doi:10.1016/0197-4580(92)90020-X.CrossRefPubMed

Wynne, C. D. L. (1995). Reinforcement accounts for transitive inference performance. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 207–217.

Wynne, C. D. L. (1997). Pigeon transitive inference: Tests of simple accounts of a complex performance. Behavioural Processes, 39, 95–112. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(96)00048-4.CrossRef

Wynne, C. D. L. (1998). A minimal model of transitive inference. In C. D. L. Wynne & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Models of action: Mechanisms for adaptive behavior (pp. 267–307). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.

Wynne, C. D. L., von Ferson, L., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1992). Pigeons’ inference are transitive and the outcome of elementary conditioning principles: A response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 313–315. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.18.3.313.CrossRef

Titel: Relational framework improves transitive inference across age groups
Auteurs: Sandra N. Moses
Melanie L. Ostreicher
Jennifer D. Ryan
Publicatiedatum: 01-03-2010
Uitgeverij: Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 2/2010
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-009-0244-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2010

Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: theoretical considerations and empirical implications

Original Article

Effector identity and orthogonal stimulus–response compatibility in blindness to response-compatible stimuli

Original Article

Factors influencing online control of video-aiming movements performed without vision of the cursor

Original Article

Structural selection in implicit learning of artificial grammars

Open Access
Original Article

Individual differences in conflict-monitoring: testing means and covariance hypothesis about the Simon and the Eriksen Flanker task

Erratum

On interference effects in concurrent perception and action

Open Access
Original Article