Top

Gepubliceerd in:

30-01-2018 | ORIGINAL PAPER

Relating Mindfulness to Attitudinal Ambivalence Through Self-concept Clarity

Auteur: Sebastian Dummel

Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness | Uitgave 5/2018

Abstract

Attitudinal ambivalence is characterized by conflict and indecision. Individuals differ in the extent to which they hold ambivalent attitudes, and this has recently been shown to be associated with mindfulness. Specifically, higher mindfulness was related to lower levels of ambivalence. The current study examined whether this relationship would be mediated by the clarity that individuals have about themselves (self-concept clarity, SCC). A close relationship between the self and attitudes has been documented in previous research, and the current study hypothesized (a) that high SCC would be associated with less attitudinal ambivalence and (b) that this association might account for the relationship between mindfulness and ambivalence. Participants of the current study (N = 114) completed measures of mindfulness and SCC as well as an attitude survey asking them about various contentious issues (e.g., euthanasia). Results of linear mixed-effects model analyses showed that both higher mindfulness and higher SCC were associated with lower levels of attitudinal ambivalence. Moreover, bootstrapping mediation analyses showed that SCC mediated the association between mindfulness and ambivalence. Results suggest that mindfulness may foster self-knowledge and that clear self-knowledge may shield individuals from feeling too much conflict and indecision about various contentious issues.

vorige artikel Genetic Variation of COMT Impacts Mindfulness and Self-Reported Everyday Cognitive Failures but Not Self-Rated Attentional Control

volgende artikel Implicit or Explicit Compassion? Effects of Compassion Cultivation Training and Comparison with Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction

Arch, J. J., & Craske, M. G. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness: emotion regulation following a focused breathing induction. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44(12), 1849–1858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2005.12.007 CrossRefPubMed

Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 CrossRef

Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504 CrossRefPubMed

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–51 http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5823 CrossRef

Bee, C. C., & Madrigal, R. (2013). Consumer uncertainty: the influence of anticipatory emotions on ambivalence, attitudes, and intentions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 12(5), 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1435 CrossRef

Britt, T. W., Pusilo, C. L., McKibben, E. S., Kelley, C., Baker, A. N., & Nielson, K. A. (2011). Personality and strength-related attitude dimensions: between and within-person relationships. Journal of Research in Personality, 45, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.07.006 CrossRef

Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822 CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, J. D., Trapnell, P. D., Heine, S. J., Katz, I. M., Lavallee, L. E., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Self-concept clarity: measurement, personality correlates, and cultural boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychologysychology, 70(I), 141–156.CrossRef

Carlson, E. N. (2013). Overcoming barriers to self-knowledge: mindfulness as a path to seeing yourself as you really are. Perspective on Psychological Science, 8, 173–186.CrossRef

Clarkson, J. J., Tormala, Z. L., DeSensi, V. L., & Wheeler, C. S. (2009). Does attitude certainty beget self-certainty? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(2), 436–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.10.004 CrossRef

Conway, M. A., Singer, J. A., & Tagini, A. (2004). The self and autobiographical memory: correspondence and coherence. Social Cognition, 22(5), 491–529.CrossRef

Crane, C., Barnhofer, T., Duggan, D., Hepburn, S., Fennle, M. V., & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and self-discrepancy in recovered depressed patients with a history of depression and suicidality. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 32, 775–787.CrossRef

Crescentini, C., & Capurso, V. (2015). Mindfulness meditation and explicit and implicit indicators of personality and self-concept changes. Frontiers in Psychology, 66, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00044

DeMarree, K. G., Christian Wheeler, S., Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Wanting other attitudes: actual-desired attitude discrepancies predict feelings of ambivalence and ambivalence consequences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.02.001 CrossRef

Giluk, T. L. (2009). Mindfulness, big five personality, and affect: a meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(8), 805–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.06.026 CrossRef

Grabovac, A. D., Lau, M. A., & Willett, B. R. (2011). Mechanisms of mindfulness: a Buddhist psychological model. Mindfulness, 2(3), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-011-0054-5 CrossRef

Haddock, G., Foad, C., Windsor-Shellard, B., Dummel, S., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (2017). On the attitudinal consequences of being mindful. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216688204

Hanley, A. W., & Garland, E. L. (2017). Clarity of mind: Structural equation modeling of associations between dispositional mindfulness, self-concept clarity and psychological well-being. Personality and Individual Differences, 106, 334–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.10.028 CrossRefPubMed

Herek, M. G. (1987). Can functions be measured? A new perspective on the functional approach to attitudes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(4), 285–303.CrossRef

Katz, E. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24(2), 163–204. https://doi.org/10.1086/266945 CrossRef

Koole, S. L., Govorun, O., Cheng, C. M., & Gallucci, M. (2009). Pulling yourself together: meditation promotes congruence between implicit and explicit self-esteem. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 1220–1226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.018 CrossRef

Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 431–449.CrossRefPubMed

Shapiro, S. L., Carlson, L. E., Astin, J. A., & Freedman, B. (2006). Mechanisms of mindfulness. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(3), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20237 CrossRefPubMed

Shrout, P., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7(4), 422–445. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.4.422 CrossRefPubMed

Thompson, M. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1995). The conflicted individual: personality-based and domain-specific antecedents of ambivalent social attitudes. Journal of Personality, 63(259–288). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00810.x.

Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Attitude certainty: a review of past findings and emerging perspectives. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1(1), 469–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00025.x CrossRef

Titel: Relating Mindfulness to Attitudinal Ambivalence Through Self-concept Clarity
Auteur: Sebastian Dummel
Publicatiedatum: 30-01-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Mindfulness / Uitgave 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1868-8527
Elektronisch ISSN: 1868-8535
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0894-3

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2018

Genetic Variation of COMT Impacts Mindfulness and Self-Reported Everyday Cognitive Failures but Not Self-Rated Attentional Control

A Matter of (Inner) Balance: The Association Between Facets of Mindfulness, Attention Deficit, and Postural Stability

The Safety of Mindfulness-Based Interventions: a Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Evaluating Short Versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire Using Rasch Analysis

Childhood Cumulative Trauma and Depressive Symptoms in Adulthood: the Role of Mindfulness and Dissociation

Commentary Regarding Johnson et al. (2017) “A Randomized Controlled Evaluation of a Secondary School Mindfulness Program for Early Adolescents: Do We Have the Recipe Right Yet?”