Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 12/2020

17-11-2020 | Letter to the Editor

Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG

Auteurs: Daniel Y. T. Fong, Ahmed M. Y. Osman, Hongmei Wang, Chengwu Yang

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 12/2020

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Excerpt

The Quality of Life Research journal has recently caught up with the trend of publishing Registered Reports, a new publication format for reporting results from a theoretically sound and novel study that has been planned a priori and properly adhered irrespective of whether there is statistical significance [1]. The format of Registered Reports in Quality of Life Research features a two-stage review process, with stage 1 focusing on the scientific rigor and innovation, after which an “In-principle Acceptance” may be issued, and stage 2 focusing on the extent the study conduct has adhered the plan as stipulated in stage 1. Such a new publication format under the 2-stage review process was developed to alleviate the long-standing issue of p-hacking or hypothesizing after results are known (HARKing) that lead to publication bias towards positive findings [2]. The Chinese PRO SIG of the International Society for Quality of Life Research (ISOQOL) would like to congratulate Quality of Life Research for the success of accomplishing the new initiative. It had been discussed in the SIG meeting at the 27th virtual annual ISOQOL conference in October 2020. …
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Boehnke, J. R., & Rutherford, C. (2020). Registered Reports at “Quality of Life Research.” Quality of Life Research, 29(10), 2605–2607.CrossRef Boehnke, J. R., & Rutherford, C. (2020). Registered Reports at “Quality of Life Research.” Quality of Life Research, 29(10), 2605–2607.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Clarke, P., Buckell, J., & Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to radically rethink peer review in Health Economics. Pharmacoecon Open, 4(1), 1–4.CrossRef Clarke, P., Buckell, J., & Barnett, A. (2020). Registered Reports: Time to radically rethink peer review in Health Economics. Pharmacoecon Open, 4(1), 1–4.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference White, K. (2019). Publications output: U.S. Trends and international comparisons. National Science Foundation. White, K. (2019). Publications output: U.S. Trends and international comparisons. National Science Foundation.
4.
go back to reference King, M., Dablander, F., Jakob, L., Agan, M. L. F., Huber, F., Haslbeck, J. M. B., et al. (2016). Registered Reports for student research. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 20–23.CrossRef King, M., Dablander, F., Jakob, L., Agan, M. L. F., Huber, F., Haslbeck, J. M. B., et al. (2016). Registered Reports for student research. Journal of European Psychology Students, 7(1), 20–23.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Registered Reports: response from the Chinese PRO SIG
Auteurs
Daniel Y. T. Fong
Ahmed M. Y. Osman
Hongmei Wang
Chengwu Yang
Publicatiedatum
17-11-2020
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 12/2020
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02696-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 12/2020

Quality of Life Research 12/2020 Naar de uitgave