Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2018

20-06-2018 | Brief Communication

Refining and supplementing candidate measures of psychological well-being for the NIH PROMIS®: qualitative results from a mixed cancer sample

Auteurs: John M. Salsman, Crystal L. Park, Elizabeth A. Hahn, Mallory A. Snyder, Login S. George, Michael F. Steger, Thomas Merluzzi, David Cella

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Purpose

The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a National Institutes of Health initiative designed to improve patient-reported outcomes using state-of-the-art psychometric methods. The aim of this study is to describe qualitative efforts to identify and refine items from psychological well-being subdomains for future testing, psychometric evaluation, and inclusion within PROMIS.

Method

Seventy-two items from eight existing measures of positive affect, life satisfaction, meaning & purpose, and general self-efficacy were reviewed, and 48 new items were identified or written where content was lacking. Cognitive interviews were conducted in patients with cancer (n = 20; 5 interviews per item) to evaluate comprehensibility, clarity, and response options of candidate items.

Results

A Lexile analysis confirmed that all items were written at the sixth grade reading level or below. A majority of patients demonstrated good understanding and logic for all items; however, nine items were identified as “moderately difficult” or “difficult” to answer. Patients reported a strong preference for confidence versus frequency response options for general self-efficacy items.

Conclusions

Altogether, 108 items were sufficiently comprehensible and clear (34 positive affect, 10 life satisfaction, 44 meaning & purpose, 20 general self-efficacy). Future research will examine the psychometric properties of the proposed item banks for further refinement and validation as PROMIS measures.
Literatuur
1.
go back to reference Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 6311, 1179–1194.CrossRef Cella, D., Riley, W., Stone, A., et al. (2010). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 6311, 1179–1194.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Garcia, S. F., Cella, D., Clauser, S. B., et al. (2007). Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2532, 5106–5112.CrossRef Garcia, S. F., Cella, D., Clauser, S. B., et al. (2007). Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: A patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2532, 5106–5112.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 576, 1069–1081.CrossRef Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Exploration on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 576, 1069–1081.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5.
go back to reference Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.CrossRef Jahoda, M. (1958). Current concepts of positive mental health. New York: Basic Books.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Offer, D., & Sabshin, M. (1966). Normality: Theoretical and clinical concepts of mental health. New York: Basic Books. Offer, D., & Sabshin, M. (1966). Normality: Theoretical and clinical concepts of mental health. New York: Basic Books.
7.
go back to reference Coan, R. W. (1974). The optimal personality; An empirical and theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. Coan, R. W. (1974). The optimal personality; An empirical and theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
8.
go back to reference Coan, R. W. (1977). Hero, artist, sage, or saint?: A survey of views on what is variously called mental health, normality, maturity, self-actualization, and human fulfillment. New York: Columbia University Press. Coan, R. W. (1977). Hero, artist, sage, or saint?: A survey of views on what is variously called mental health, normality, maturity, self-actualization, and human fulfillment. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
go back to reference Compton, W. C. (2001). Toward a tripartite factor structure of mental health: Subjective well-being, personal growth, and religiosity. The Journal of psychology, 1355, 486–500.CrossRef Compton, W. C. (2001). Toward a tripartite factor structure of mental health: Subjective well-being, personal growth, and religiosity. The Journal of psychology, 1355, 486–500.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lee Duckworth, A., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629–651.CrossRef Lee Duckworth, A., Steen, T. A., & Seligman, M. E. (2005). Positive psychology in clinical practice. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 629–651.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Menninger, W. C., Hall, B. H., Alumbaugh, G. K., & Brosin, H. W. (1967). A psychiatrist for a troubled world: Selected papers of William C. Menninger, M.D. New York: Viking Press. Menninger, W. C., Hall, B. H., Alumbaugh, G. K., & Brosin, H. W. (1967). A psychiatrist for a troubled world: Selected papers of William C. Menninger, M.D. New York: Viking Press.
12.
go back to reference Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 1316, 925–971.CrossRef Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 1316, 925–971.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 491, 71–75.CrossRef Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 491, 71–75.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 531, 80–93.CrossRef Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 531, 80–93.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-Nelson. Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology (pp. 35–37). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.
16.
go back to reference Salsman, J., Lai, J.-S., Hendrie, H., et al. (2014). Assessing psychological well-being: Self-report instruments for the NIH Toolbox. Quality of Life Research, 231, 205–215.CrossRef Salsman, J., Lai, J.-S., Hendrie, H., et al. (2014). Assessing psychological well-being: Self-report instruments for the NIH Toolbox. Quality of Life Research, 231, 205–215.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 12, 115–144.CrossRef Park, C. L., & Folkman, S. (1997). Meaning in the context of stress and coping. Review of General Psychology, 12, 115–144.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lai, J. S., Garcia, S. F., Salsman, J. M., Rosenbloom, S., & Cella, D. (2012). The psychosocial impact of cancer: Evidence in support of independent general positive and negative components. Quality of Life Research, 212, 195–207.CrossRef Lai, J. S., Garcia, S. F., Salsman, J. M., Rosenbloom, S., & Cella, D. (2012). The psychosocial impact of cancer: Evidence in support of independent general positive and negative components. Quality of Life Research, 212, 195–207.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Bevans, K., et al. (2014). Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: Presentation of first results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 672, 207–218.CrossRef Ravens-Sieberer, U., Devine, J., Bevans, K., et al. (2014). Subjective well-being measures for children were developed within the PROMIS project: Presentation of first results. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 672, 207–218.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Victorson, D., Choi, S., Judson, M. A., & Cella, D. (2013). Development and testing of item response theory-based item banks and short forms for eye, skin and lung problems in sarcoidosis. Quality of Life Research, 244, 1–13. Victorson, D., Choi, S., Judson, M. A., & Cella, D. (2013). Development and testing of item response theory-based item banks and short forms for eye, skin and lung problems in sarcoidosis. Quality of Life Research, 244, 1–13.
22.
go back to reference Kupst, M. J., Butt, Z., Stoney, C. M., et al. (2015). Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function. Anxiety Stress Coping, 285, 531–544.CrossRef Kupst, M. J., Butt, Z., Stoney, C. M., et al. (2015). Assessment of stress and self-efficacy for the NIH Toolbox for Neurological and Behavioral Function. Anxiety Stress Coping, 285, 531–544.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 352, 259–265.CrossRef Kammann, R., & Flett, R. (1983). Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness. Australian Journal of Psychology, 352, 259–265.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 241, 49–58.CrossRef Peterman, A. H., Fitchett, G., Brady, M. J., Hernandez, L., & Cella, D. (2002). Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy–spiritual well-being scale (FACIT-Sp). Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 241, 49–58.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 123, 231–240.CrossRef Huebner, E. S. (1991). Initial development of the student’s life satisfaction scale. School Psychology International, 123, 231–240.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Scheier, M., Wrosch, C., Baum, A., et al. (2006). The life engagement test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 293, 291–298.CrossRef Scheier, M., Wrosch, C., Baum, A., et al. (2006). The life engagement test: Assessing purpose in life. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 293, 291–298.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior. Vol 4, (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (ed.) Encyclopedia of human behavior. Vol 4, (pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.
29.
go back to reference George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2016). Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions. Review of General Psychology, 203, 205.CrossRef George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2016). Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions. Review of General Psychology, 203, 205.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Refining and supplementing candidate measures of psychological well-being for the NIH PROMIS®: qualitative results from a mixed cancer sample
Auteurs
John M. Salsman
Crystal L. Park
Elizabeth A. Hahn
Mallory A. Snyder
Login S. George
Michael F. Steger
Thomas Merluzzi
David Cella
Publicatiedatum
20-06-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1896-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2018

Quality of Life Research 9/2018 Naar de uitgave