Skip to main content

Spatial Analysis Meets Internet Research

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Second International Handbook of Internet Research

Abstract

Spatial analysis refers to a set of techniques applied to the spatial expression of human behavior that echoes the rift between quantitative and economic geography. Despite its reliance on a statistical framework, spatial analysis has contended with methodological challenges that internet research scholars are increasingly negotiating, including the multidimensionality of the object of study, the interdisciplinary nature of the methodological approaches, and the strong dependence on computers for data collection and analysis. Together with traditional, often governmental sources of geographic information, internet-powered devices are generating a wealth of location-rich information ordinarily referred to as “geoweb.” The availability of such user-generated sources of spatial data, coupled with the rapid development of spatial analysis computing platforms, provides avenues for quantitative research on unprecedented scales and contributes to bringing these two areas of scholarship into closer contact with one another. The R environment for statistical computing offers a robust and unified platform where spatial and internet researchers alike can rely on a multitude of packages for spatial analysis and statistical computing. Researchers can use this computational resource to perform data analysis of streams of social media data with geographic references and/or coordinates that can be mapped to specific locations. This wealth of data allows researchers to ask meaningful geographical, sociological, and political research questions associated with the development of the internet that until now could only be evaluated more limitedly due to scanty data. This chapter aims to familiarize internet researchers with spatial analysis and to provide a soft learning curve to scholars unfamiliar with the R environment for statistical computing. To this end, an overview of methods, tools, and the literature dedicated to spatial analysis of internet-generated data is presented. The chapter also reviews seminal literature in the area, describes the core components of the R environment for spatial analysis, and provides an up-to-date overview of the possibilities spatial analysis scholarship offers to internet researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Backstrom L, Kleinberg J, Kumar R, Novak J (2008) Spatial variation in search engine queries. Paper presented at the 17th international conference on World Wide Web

    Google Scholar 

  • Baddeley A, Turner R (2005) Spatstat: an R package for analyzing spatial point patterns. Retrieved from www.jstatsoft.org

  • Barthelmé S, Trukenbrod H, Engbert R, Wichmann F (2012) Modelling fixation locations using spatial point processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.2370

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastos MT, Mercea D, Charpentier A (2015) Tents, tweets, and events: the interplay between ongoing protests and social media. J Commun 65(2):320–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastos MT, Recuero R, Zago G (2014) Taking tweets to the streets: a spatial analysis of the vinegar protests in Brazil. First Monday 19(3). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i3.5227

  • Baym NK (1999) Tune in, log on: soaps, fandom, and online community, vol 3. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett WL, Breunig C, Givens T (2008) Communication and political mobilization: digital media and the Organization of Anti-Iraq war Demonstrations in the U.S. Polit Commun 25(3):269–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600802197434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett WL, Segerberg A (2013) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett WL, Segerberg A, Walker S (2014) Organization in the crowd: peer production in large-scale networked protests. Inform Comm Soc 17(2):232–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.870379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R (2015) Analysis of spatial data. CRAN task view, CRAN

    Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Hauke J, Kossowski T (2013) Computing the Jacobian in Gaussian spatial autoregressive models: an illustrated comparison of available methods. Geogr Anal 45(2):150–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Keitt T, Rowlingson B (2015) rgdal: bindings for the geospatial data abstraction (version 0.9–2), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgdal

  • Bivand R, Lewin-Koh NJ (2015) maptools: tools for reading and handling spatial objects (version 0.8–34), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools

  • Bivand R, Rundel C (2014) rgeos: Interface to geometry engine – open source (GEOS) (version 0.3–8), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rgeos

  • Bivand RS, Pebesma EJ, Gómez-Rubio V, Pebesma EJ (2008) Applied spatial data analysis with R, vol 747248717. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodenhamer DJ, Corrigan J, Harris TM (2010) The spatial humanities: GIS and the future of humanities scholarship. Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd D, Golder S, Lotan G (2010) Tweet, tweet, retweet: conversational aspects of retweeting on Twitter, Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Liang YE (2012) Tools and methods for capturing Twitter data during natural disasters. First Monday 17(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (1997) The information age: economy, society and culture vol II – the power of identity. Blackwell, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2009) Communication power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells M (2012) Networks of outrage and hope. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Z, Caverlee J, Lee K (2010) You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating Twitter users. Paper presented at the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheshire J, Batty M (2012) Visualisation tools for understanding big data. Environ Plan B Plan Des 39(3):413–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crampton JW, Graham M, Poorthuis A, Shelton T, Stephens M, Wilson MW et al (2013) Beyond the geotag: situating ‘big data’ and leveraging the potential of the geoweb. Cartogr Geogr Inf Sci 40:130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cranshaw J, Schwartz R, Hong J, Sadeh N (2012) The livehoods project: utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city. Paper presented at the 6th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry MR (2002) Discursive displacement and the seminal ambiguity of space and place. In: Lievrouw L, Livingstone S (eds) The handbook of new media. SAGE, London, pp 502–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Diani M (2000) Social movement networks virtual and real. Inform Commun Soc 3(3):386–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge M, Kitchin R (2001) Atlas of cyberspace, vol 158. Addison-Wesley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugster MJ, Schlesinger T (2013) Osmar: OpenStreetMap and R. R Journal 5(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fellows I, Stotz JP (2013) OpenStreetMap: Access to open street map raster images (version 0.3.1), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=OpenStreetMap

  • Fischer MM, Getis A (2009) Handbook of applied spatial analysis: software tools, methods and applications. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan Q, Attenberg J, Markowetz A, Suel T (2008) Analysis of geographic queries in a search engine log. Paper presented at the 1st International Workshop on Location and the Web

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao H, Tang J, Liu H (2012) Exploring social-historical ties on location-based social networks. In: Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’12) June 4–8. Dublin, Ireland, pp 114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand AE, Diggle P, Guttorp P, Fuentes M (2010) Handbook of spatial statistics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg J, Mohebbi MH, Patel RS, Brammer L, Smolinski MS, Brilliant L (2008) Detecting influenza epidemics using search engine query data. Nature 457(7232):1012–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Bailón S, Borge-Holthoefer J, Rivero A, Moreno Y (2011) The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci Rep 1:197. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham M, Zook M, Boulton A (2013) Augmented reality in urban places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Trans Inst Br Geogr 38(3):464–479. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00539.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graul C (2015) LeafletR: interactive web-maps based on the leaflet javascript library (version 0.3–2), CRAN. Retrieved from http://cran.r-project.org/package=leafletR

  • Greenberg JA (2014) spatial.tools: R functions for working with spatial data (version 1.4.8), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=spatial.tools

  • Harrison S, Dourish P (2006) Re-space-ing place: place and space ten years on. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on computer supported cooperative work

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, B, Hong L, Suh B, Chi EH (2011) Tweets from Justin Bieber's heart: the dynamics of the location field in user profiles. Paper presented at the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1980000/1978976/p237-hecht.pdf?ip=169.237.62.143&id=1978976&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&key=CA367851C7E3CE77%2EBD0EBCE24FE9A3C5%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35&CFID=823708297&CFTOKEN=13640073&__acm__=1470779372_43ce61c727e9b7db7ac2d3ba622b36e8

  • Hey T (2012) The fourth paradigm – data-intensive scientific discovery. In: Kurbanoğlu S, Al U, Erdoğan P, Tonta Y, Uçak N (eds) E-science and information management, vol 317. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hijmans RJ (2015) Raster: geographic data analysis and modeling (version 2.3–40), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=raster

  • Huang J, Thornton KM, Efthimiadis EN (2010) Conversational tagging in Twitter. Paper presented at the 21st ACM conference on hypertext and hypermedia, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/1820000/1810647/p173-huang.pdf?ip=169.237.62.143&id=1810647&acc=ACTIVE%20SERVICE&key=CA367851C7E3CE77%2EBD0EBCE24FE9A3C5%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35%2E4D4702B0C3E38B35&CFID=823708297&CFTOKEN=13640073&__acm__=1470779376_3a6df9ca61b6a6383b211f5ddc9db942

  • Illian J, Penttinen PA, Stoyan H, Stoyan D (2008) Statistical analysis and modelling of spatial point patterns. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2013) Big data and human geography: opportunities, challenges and risks. Dialog Human Geogr 3(3):262–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043820613513388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitchin R (2014) Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data Soc 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714528481

  • Kulldorff M (1997) A spatial scan statistic. Commun Stat Theor Meth 26(6):1481–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulldorff M (2001) Prospective time periodic geographical disease surveillance using a scan statistic. J R Stat Soc A Stat Soc 164(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-985x.00186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulldorff M, Athas WF, Feurer EJ, Miller BA, Key CR (1998) Evaluating cluster alarms: a space-time scan statistic and brain cancer in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Am J Public Health 88(9):1377–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulldorff M, Nagarwalla N (1995) Spatial disease clusters: detection and inference. Stat Med 14(8):799–810. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780140809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulshrestha J, Kooti F, Nikravesh A, Gummadi KP (2012) Geographic dissection of the Twitter network. Paper presented at the 6th International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Leetaru K, Wang S, Cao G, Padmanabhan A, Shook E (2013) Mapping the global Twitter heartbeat: the geography of Twitter. First Monday, 18(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Manyika J, Chui M, Brown B, Bughin J, Dobbs R, Roxburgh C et al (2011) Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute, Lexington

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey D (2005) For space. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer-Schönberger V, Cukier K (2013) Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think. New York, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller HJ, Goodchild MF (2014) Data-driven geography. GeoJournal 80(4):449–461

    Google Scholar 

  • Noulas A, Scellato S, Mascolo C, Pontil M (2011). An empirical study of geographic user activity patterns in foursquare. In: Fifth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’11) July 17–21. Barcelona (Spain), pp 570–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Papacharissi Z, Oliveira M d F (2012) Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. J Commun 62(2):266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulos E, Jenkins T (2005) Urban probes: encountering our emerging urban atmospheres. Paper presented at the proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma E (2012) Spacetime: spatio-temporal data in R. J Stat Softw 51(7):1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pebesma EJ, Bivand RS (2005) Classes and methods for spatial data in R. R News 5(2):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer P, Sheppard E (2006) Geography matters: agency, structures and dynamics at the intersection of economics and geography. J Econ Geogr 6(5):619–637. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbl005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quercia D, Capra L, Crowcroft J (2012) The social world of Twitter: topics, geography, and emotions. In: Sixth International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (ICWSM’12). Dublin, Ireland, pp 298–305

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing (version 3.0.3). CRAN, Vienna Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakaki T, Okazaki M, Matsuo Y (2010) Earthquake shakes Twitter users: real-time event detection by social sensors. Paper presented at the 19th international conference on World Wide Web

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan L, Morgan J, Housley W, Williams M, Edwards A, Burnap P et al (2013) Knowing the tweeters: deriving sociologically relevant demographics from Twitter. Sociol Res Online 18(3):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South A (2011) Rworldmap: a new R package for mapping global data. The R Journal 3(1):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South A (2012) rworldxtra: country boundaries at high resolution (version 1.01), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=rworldxtra

  • Stabler B (2013) shapefiles: read and write ESRI shapefiles (version 0.7), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=shapefiles

  • Takhteyev Y, Gruzd A, Wellman B (2012) Geography of Twitter networks. Soc Networks 34(1):73–81 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2011.05.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow S (2005) The new transnational activism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis Y (2013) The wealth of (occupation) networks? Communication patterns and information distribution in a Twitter protest network. J Inform Tech Polit 10(1):35–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci Z (2014) Big questions for social media big data: representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. Paper presented at the 8th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM14)

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Volkovich Y, Scellato S, Laniado D, Mascolo C, Kaltenbrunner A (2012) The length of bridge ties: structural and geographic properties of online social interactions. Paper presented at the 6th International AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Warf B, Arias S (2008) The spatial turn: interdisciplinary perspectives. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidmann NB, Gleditsch KS (2013) cshapes: CShapes dataset and utilities (version 0.4–2), CRAN. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cshapes

  • Yardi S, Boyd D (2010) Tweeting from the Town Square: measuring geographic local networks. Paper presented at the 4th international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco T. Bastos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bastos, M.T. (2020). Spatial Analysis Meets Internet Research. In: Hunsinger, J., Allen, M., Klastrup, L. (eds) Second International Handbook of Internet Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1555-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics