Skip to main content

Defense Style Questionnaire

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences
  • 1785 Accesses

Synonyms

DSQ

Definition

Defense styles are empirically validated clusters of psychological defense mechanisms, measured with the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ). The DSQ is a paper-pen, self-report questionnaire, with two versions containing either 88 or 40 items. Each item is a statement that the subject scores according to the degree of agreement to its content on a Likert-type interval scale, with scores ranging from one (total disagreement) to nine (full agreement).

Introduction

The concept of character defenses hails from the early days of psychoanalysis; according to Anna Freud, they form “the ways and means by which the ego wards off displeasure and anxiety, and exercises control over impulsive behavior, affects and instinctive urges” (Freud 2011). Although defenses have been defined and differentiated for some time, their unconscious nature made their empirical measurement difficult. To this end, the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ) was developed to assess defense styles...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bond, M. (1992). An empirical study of defensive styles: The Defense Style Questionnaire. In Ego mechanisms of defense: A guide for clinicians and researchers (pp. 127–158). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M. (2004). Empirical studies of defense style: Relationships with psychopathology and change. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(5), 263–278.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M., Gardner, S. T., Christian, J., & Sigal, J. J. (1983). Empirical study of self-rated defense styles. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(3), 333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, M., Christopher, J., Gautier, M., Goldenberg, M., Oppenheimer, J., & Simand, J. (1989). Validating the self-report of defense styles. Journal of Personality Disorders, 3(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chabrol, H., Rousseau, A., Rodgers, R., Callahan, S., Pirlot, G., & Sztulman, H. (2005). A study of the face validity of the 40 item version of the Defense Style Questionnaire (DSQ-40). The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 193(11), 756–758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. (2011). The ego and the mechanisms of defence. London: Karnac Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thygesen, K. L., Drapeau, M., Trijsburg, R. W., Lecours, S., & De Roten, Y. (2008). Assessing defense styles: Factor structure and psychometric properties of the new Defense Style Questionnaire 60 (DSQ-60). International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(2), 171–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaillant, G. E., Bond, M., & Vaillant, C. O. (1986). An empirically validated hierarchy of defense mechanisms. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43(8), 786–794.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios D. Floros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Floros, G.D. (2017). Defense Style Questionnaire. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T. (eds) Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_22-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28099-8_22-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28099-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics