Abstract:
The entry briefly describes the value of individualized quality of life measures and the philosophy behind them and outlines the main measures in this field. It then focuses on the Patient Generated Index (PGI) (Ruta et al., 1994) and explains its purpose and methodology. Three different forms of administration are explored and its use in a variety of healthcare settings is described. Finally, its psychometric properties are summarized. The Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) (Ruta et al., 2004a) is then introduced, which is an open-ended measure with a simple method of administration, appropriate for use in developing countries. The piloting and administration of the GPGI in three developing country settings is described in detail to illustrate the challenges of measuring quality of life in these contexts. The validation process is described, focusing particularly on the innovative technique of qualitative validation, which used semi-structured interviews collected on the same occasion to assess the accuracy with which the measure captured the respondent’s world view. Some response errors were identified, which required additional administrator training, and the value of a brief accompanying interview are discussed. The measure’s advantages are summarized, namely that is flexible and person-centered, relatively quick to administer, generates new information, works across cultures, and provides a direct measure of the gap theory of quality of life (Calman, 1984). The entry concludes that the common criticism of individualized measures that respondents are not rating the same dimensions evaporates when we consider that respondents are rating the results of their judgments of what is important to quality of life: these judgments are directly comparable (Parducci, 1995, p. 29). Therefore they provide a valid measure of people’s perceptions of the quality of their life as a whole across time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ADDQOL:
-
Audit of Diabetes Dependent QOL
- GPGI:
-
Global Person Generated Index
- MacDQOL:
-
individualized measure of the impact of macular degeneration on quality of life
- PGI:
-
Patient Generated Index
- QOL:
-
quality of life
- SEIQOL:
- SPSS:
-
Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (quantitative data analysis software)
- SWLS:
-
Satisfaction with Life Scale
- WeD:
-
Wellbeing in Developing Countries ESRC Research Group (see http://www.welldev.org.uk/)
References
Ahmed SM, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hanley JA, Cohen SR. (2005). Qual Life Res. 14: 2247–2257.
Bevan P, Kebede K, Pankhurst A. (2003). A Report on a Very Informal Pilot of the Person Generated Index of Quality of Life in Ethiopia (unpublished report for the “Wellbeing in Developing Countries Research Group” at the University of Bath, UK).
Bowling A. (1995). Soc Sci Med. 41(10): 1447–1462.
Bradley C, Todd C, Gorton T, Symonds E, Martin A. (1999). Qual Life Res. 8: 79–91.
Callaghan BG, Condie ME. (2003). Clin Rehabil. 17: 858–864.
Calman K. (1984). J Med Ethics. 10: 124–127.
Camfield L, Ruta D. (2007). “Translation in Not Enough": Using the Global Person Generated Index (GPGI) to Assess Individual Quality of Life in Bangladesh, Thailand, and Ethiopia. Quality of Life Research, 16(6): 1039–1051.
Cummins RA. (1995). Soc Indic Res. 35: 179–200.
Cummins RA, Gullone E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quality of Life in Cities. National University of Singapore, Singapore, pp. 74–93.
Dempster M, Donnelly M. (2000). Qual Life Res. 9: 369–375.
Diener E, Emmons RA, Larsen RJ, Griffin. (1985). J Pers Assess. 49(1): 71–75.
Ferrans CE, Frisch M. (2004). The Importance of Importance: Why Weight Life Satisfaction. Paper Presented at the Advancing Quality of Life in a Turbulent World, International Society for Quality of Life Studies, Philadelphia, PA.
Griffiths R, Jayasuriya R, Maitlandv H. (2000). Aust N Z J Public Health. 24(5): 529–535.
Hensel E, Rose J, Kroese BS, Banks-Smith J. (2002). J Intellect Disabil Res. 46(2): 95–107.
Herd RM, Tidman MJ, Ruta D, Hunter JAA. (1997). Br J Dermatol. 136: 502–507.
International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index, 4th ed. Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University, Melbourne (http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acQOL/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.).
Jongudomkarn D, Camfield L. (2006). Soc Indic Res. 78: 489–529.
Lindblad AK, Ring L, Glimelius B, Hansson MG. (2002). Acta Oncologica. 41(6): 507–516.
Macduff C, Russell E. (1998). Qual Life Res. 7: 761-769.
Martin F, Camfield L, Rodham K, Kliempt P, Ruta D. (2007). Qual Life Res. 16(4): 705–715.
McGee H, et al. (1991). Psychol Med. 21: 749–759.
Mitchell J, Bradley C. (2004). Qual Life Res. 13: 1163–1175.
Narayan DR, Chambers R, Shah MK, Petesch P. (2000). Voices of the Poor: Crying out for Change. Oxford University Press for the World Bank, New York.
O’Boyle A, Browne J, Hickey A, et al. (1995). SEIQOL Administration Manual. Department of Psychology, Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland, Dublin.
Parducci A. (1995). Happiness, Pleasure, and Judgment: The Contextual Theory and Its Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hove.
Ruta D, Camfield L, Donaldson C. (2006). Sen and the Art of Quality of Life Maintenance: Towards a Working Definition of Quality of Life. Wellbeing in Developing Countries (WeD) Research Group Working Paper. Available at: http://www.bath.ac.uk/econ-dev/wellbeing/research/workingpaperpdf/wed12.pdf.
Ruta DA, Camfield L, Martin F. (2004a). Qual Life Res. 13: 1545.
Ruta D, Garratt AM, Leng M, Russell IT, MacDonald LM. (1994). Med Care. 32(11): 1109–1126.
Ruta D, Martin F, Camfield L, Devine J, Bevan P. (2004b). Assessing Individual Quality of Life in Developing Countries: Piloting a Global PGI in Ethiopia and Bangladesh. Paper presented at the International Society for Quality of Life Research: Harmonizing International Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Research, Hong Kong.
Skevington SM, Bradshaw J, Saxena S. (1999). Soc Sci Med. 48: 473–487.
Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. (1999). Soc Sci Med. 48: 1507–1515.
Streiner D, Norman G. (1995). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Symon A, MacKay A, Ruta D. (2003). J Adv Nurs. 42(1): 21–29.
Tovbin D, Gidron Y, Jean T, Granovsky R, Schnieder A. (2003). Qual Life Res. 12: 709–717.
Trauer T, MacKinnon A. (2004). Qual Life Res. 10(7): 579–585.
Tully MP, Cantrill JA. (2002). J Health Serv Res Policy. 7(2): 81–89.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. (1992). Med Care. 30: 473–483.
Weitzenkamp DA, Gerhart KA, Charlifue SW, Glass CA, Whiteneck GG. (2000). Br J Health Psychol. 5: 57–69.
White S, Pettit J. (2005). Participatory approaches and the measurement of human wellbeing. In: McGillivray M (ed.) Measuring Human Wellbeing. WIDER/Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media LLC
About this entry
Cite this entry
Martin, F., Camfield, L., Ruta, D. (2010). The Global Person Generated Index. In: Preedy, V.R., Watson, R.R. (eds) Handbook of Disease Burdens and Quality of Life Measures. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78665-0_3
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-78664-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-78665-0
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine