Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Research has argued that adolescents are at risk for harmful effects of sexual media, but little is known about the role of parents and friends on adolescents’ media use in regard of these effects. The present two-wave study investigated whether prior parental and friends’ influences on adolescents’ use of sexual media shape their sexual attitudes and behaviors, and vice versa if prior sexual attitudes and behaviors predict parental and friends’ media mediation. At two measurement points 18 months apart, 528 adolescents (12–17 years; 51.3 % girls) reported on permissive sexual attitudes, sexual experience, perceived parental and friends’ mediation of sexual media use, and communication with parents and friends about sex. Structural Equation Modeling shows that parents’ mediation activities on adolescents’ media use were not followed by less sexual experience and less permissive attitudes. On the contrary, parental restrictive mediation of girls’ media use unexpectedly was followed by somewhat more sexual experience. Friends’ interventions with media use did not predict adolescents’ sexual experience and attitudes neither. Inverse relationships showed that prior sexual experience was followed by less restrictive parental mediation among boys, and both among boys and girls that permissive sexual attitudes were followed by less restrictive and less active parental mediation. At the same time, sexually more experienced and more permissive boys and girls did report more media pressure from and sexual communication with their friends later on. Our study thus indicates that the opposite agent roles of parents and friends for adolescents also applies to their usage of sexual media.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
APA. (2007). Report of the APA task force on the sexualization of girls. Washington DC: American Psychological Association. http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/sexualization.html.
Ashby, S., Arcari, C., & Edmonson, B. (2006). Television viewing and risk of sexual initiation by young adolescents. Archives of Pediatric Adolescent Medicine, 160, 375–380. CrossRef
Aubrey, J. S. (2007). The impact of sexually objectifying media on negative body emotions and sexual self-perceptions: Investigating the mediating role of body self-consciousness. Mass Communication & Society, 10, 1–23.
Baumgartner, S., Valkenburg, P., & Peter, J. (2011). The influence of descriptive and injunctive peer norms on adolescents’ risky sexual online behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 753–758. CrossRef
Beentjes, H., Konig, R., & Krzeszewski, D. (2008). Muziekvideo’s en seksuele opvattingen: Een enquête onder jongeren [Music video’s and sexual attitudes; a survey among adolescents]. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap, 36, 234–252. CrossRef
Berkowitz, A. D. (2005). An overview of the social norms approach. In L. C. Lederman & L. P. Stewart (Eds.), Changing the culture of college drinking: A socially situated health communication campaign. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
Bleakley, A., Hennessy, M., Fishbein, M., & Jordan, A. (2008). It works both ways: The relationship between exposure to sexual content in the media and adolescent sexual behavior. Media Psychology, 11, 443–461.
Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.
Brown, J., Steele, J., & Walsh-Childers, K. (Eds.). (2002). Sexual teens, sexual media: Investigating media’s influence on adolescent sexuality. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bryant, J., & Rockwell, S. (1994). Effects of massive exposure to sexually oriented prime-time television programming on adolescents’ moral judgement. In D. Zillmann, J. Bryant, & A. Huston (Eds.), Media, children and the family. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Chia, S. (2006). How peers mediate media influence on adolescents’ sexual attitudes and sexual behavior. Journal of Communication, 56, 585–606. CrossRef
Cumberbatch, G., Gauntlett, S., & Littlejohns, V. (2003). A content analysis of sexual activity and nudity on British terrestrial television: Year on year comparisons 1993 to 2002. London: Broadcasting Standards Commission.
De Graaf, H., Vanweesenbeeck, I., Woertman, L., & Meeus, W. (2011). Parenting and adolescents’ sexual development in western societies: A literature review. European Psychologist, 16, 21–31. CrossRef
Dishion, T. J., & Nelson, S. E. (2007). Male adolescent friendships: Relationship dynamics that predict adult adjustment. In R. C. M. E. Engels, M. Kerr, & H. Stattin (Eds.), Friends, lovers and groups. Key relationships in adolescence (pp. 61–80). West-Sussex: Wiley.
Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Gunter, B. (2002). Media sex: What are the issues? Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Guo, W., & Nathanson, A. (2011). The effects of parental mediation of sexual content on the sexual knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of adolescents in the US. Journal of Children and Media, 5, 358–378. CrossRef
Kennedy, T., & Wellman, B. (2007). The networked household. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 645–667. CrossRef
Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Finnerty, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2005). Sex on TV 4. A Biennial report to the Kaiser Family Foundation. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Mendoza, K. (2009). Surveying parental mediation: Connections, challenges, and questions for media literacy. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 1, 28–41.
Nathanson, A. (2001). Parents versus peers: Exploring the significance of peer mediation of antisocial television. Communication Research, 28, 251–274. CrossRef
Nelis, H. & Van Sark, Y. (2010). Puberbrein binnenstebuiten: Wat beweegt jongeren van 10 tot 25 jaar? [Pubertal brains inside out: What moves Young people from 10–25 years?] Utrecht/Antwerpen: Kosmos uitgevers.
Nikken, P. (2011). Pubers, media en seks [Adolescents, media and sex]. In M. Clerkx, R. de Groot & F. Prins (Eds.), Grensoverschrijdend gedrag van pubers [Transgressing behavior by adolescents] (pp. 85–100). Leuven: Garant.
Nikken, P. (2012). On media, children and their parents. Amsterdam: SWP publishers.
Papadopoulos, L. (2010). Sexualisation of young people: Review. Londen: Home Office.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2009). Adolescents’ exposure to sexually explicit internet material and notions of women as sex objects: Assessing causality and underlying processes. Journal of Communication, 59, 407–432. CrossRef
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2010a). Processes underlying the effects of adolescents’ use of sexually explicit internet material: The role of perceived realism. Communication Research, 37, 375–399. CrossRef
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. (2010b). Adolescents’ use of sexually explicit internet material and sexual uncertainty: The role of involvement and gender. Communication Monographs, 77, 357–375. CrossRef
Rideout, V., Foehr, U., & Roberts, D. (2010). Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8-to-18-year-olds. Menlo Park: Kaiser Family Foundation.
Rivadeneyra, R., & Lebo, M. J. (2008). The association between television-viewing behaviors and adolescent dating role attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 291–305.
Schofield Clark, L. (2011). Parental mediation theory for the digital age. Communication Theory, 21, 323–343. CrossRef
Strouse, J., Buerkel-Rothfuss, N., & Long, E. (1995). Gender and family as moderators of the relationship between music video exposure and adolescent sexual permissiveness. Adolescence, 30(119), 505–521. PubMed
Ward, M. (2003). Understanding the role of entertainment media in the sexual socialization of American youth: A review of empirical research. Developmental Review, 23, 347–388. CrossRef
- Reciprocal Relationships Between Friends’ and Parental Mediation of Adolescents’ Media Use and Their Sexual Attitudes and Behavior
Hanneke de Graaf
- Springer US