Top

Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment

Gepubliceerd in:

01-06-2011

Reassessing the Assessment of Change in At-Risk Youth: Conflict and Coherence in Overall Versus Contextual Assessments of Behavior

Auteurs: Jack C. Wright, Audrey L. Zakriski, Anselma G. Hartley, Harry W. Parad

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment | Uitgave 2/2011

Abstract

This research examined how a contextual approach to personality assessment can reveal change processes that are obscured by measures of overall behavior frequencies. Using field observations of 336 children from three summers at a program for at-risk youth, we illustrate how children’s social experiences change over time, how their reactions to these experiences change, and how both processes contribute to changes in the overall frequencies of their prosocial, aggressive, and withdrawn behavior. Children showing opposite patterns of change in their environments and their reactions to them were nevertheless similar in their overall amount of change. The results clarify how changes in reactions and social experiences can be disentangled and reintegrated in order to deepen our understanding of personality change processes. Implications for change assessments that rely on overall behavior summaries are highlighted for program, individual, and intra-individual levels of analysis.

vorige artikel Longitudinal Investigation of the Link Between Proactive and Reactive Aggression and Disciplinary Actions in an After-School Care Program

volgende artikel Characterizing Pathological Narcissism in Terms of the HEXACO Model of Personality

Although age and gender were not our main focus, and the small number of girls dictated caution, we summarize the results for difference scores (T2 - T1). For aggressive reactions, there was a main effect for age, F(1, 332) = 4.09, p < .05; younger children showed smaller increases than older ones (Ms = .08, .19). A gender x event interaction was found, F(4, 1328) = 2.59, p < .04. Girls’ aggression to peer talk increased (.24), whereas boys’ decreased (−.12); the reverse was found for reactions to adult instruct (−.05, .07). For withdrawal, there was an age effect (Ms = −.16, –.32 for younger vs. older), F(1, 332) = 6.21, p < .02, and gender (Ms = −.34, –.14, for girls vs. boys), F(1, 332) = 10.73, p < .001, and a 3-way interaction, F(4, 1328) = 4.14, p < .005. Older girls showed steeper decreases in withdrawal to adult warn/discipline than younger girls (Ms = −.52, –.15), but not to peer tease/boss (−.12, –.24). The reverse was found for boys. For prosocial, there was an interaction between gender and type of reaction, F(4, 1328) = 3.11, p < .02. Girls showed steeper increases than boys in their prosocial reactions to adult praise (.36, .13) and to adult instruct (.23, .03), whereas boys showed larger increases in their prosocial reactions to peer talk (.15, –.04).

We performed stepwise regressions with changes in the 5 event rates and 5 reaction rates as predictors, entering age and gender at step 1, and using a .01 entry threshold for other predictors. Age and gender accounted for little variance (R ² < .03); older children showed less change in withdrawn and prosocial behavior. Both event change and reaction change predicted overall change; event change entered first for aggressive and prosocial behavior. For aggression change the predictors to enter (in order) were adult warn/discipline (∆R ² = .23), aggression to adult instruct (.09), aggression to adult warn/discipline (.05), and peer tease/boss (.02); R ² for the full model was .40. For prosocial the predictors were adult warn/discipline (∆R ² = .16), prosocial to adult instruct (.07), and adult instruct (.02), and full-model R ² was .28. For withdrawal the predictors were: withdrawal to adult instruct (∆R ² = .17), adult warn/discipline (.11), and withdrawal to adult warn/discipline (.02), and the full-model R ² was .32.

Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: University of Vermont.

August, G. J., Realmuto, G. M., Hektner, J. M., & Bloomquist, M. L. (2001). An integrated components preventive intervention for aggressive elementary school children: the Early Risers Program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(4), 614–626.PubMedCrossRef

Barkley, R. A. (1988). Child behavior rating scales and checklists. In M. Rutter, A. H. Tuna, & I. S. Lann (Eds.), Assessment and diagnosis in child psychopathology (pp. 113–155). New York: Guilford.

Barlow, D. H., & Nock, M. K. (2009). Why can’t we be more idiographic in our research? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4, 19–21.CrossRef

Block, J. (1989). Critique of the act frequency approach to personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 234–245.CrossRef

Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park: Sage.

Cervone, D., Shadel, W. G., & Jencius, S. (2001). Social-cognitive theory of personality assessment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 33–50.CrossRef

Chambers, J. M., & Hastie, T. J. (1992). Statistical models in S. Pacific Grove: Wadsworth.

Connor, D. F., Miller, K. P., Cunningham, J. A., & Melloni, R. H. (2002). What does getting better mean? Child improvement and measure of outcome in residential treatment. The American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 72, 110–117.PubMedCrossRef

De Los Reyes, A., & Kazdin, A. (2005). Informant discrepancies in the assessment of childhood psychopathology: a critical review, theoretical framework, and recommendations for further study. Psychological Bulletin, 131, 483–509.PubMedCrossRef

Dirks, M. A., Treat, T. A., & Weersing, V. R. (2007a). Integrating theoretical, measurement, and intervention models of youth social competence. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 327–347.PubMedCrossRef

Dirks, M. A., Treat, T. A., & Weersing, V. R. (2007b). The situation specificity of youth responses to peer provocation. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 36, 621–628.PubMedCrossRef

Dodge, K. A., McClaskey, C., & Feldman, E. (1985). Situational approach to the assessment of social competence in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 344–353.PubMedCrossRef

Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in programs for youth. New York: Guilford.

Drabick, D. A. G., Gadow, K. D., & Loney, J. (2008). Co-occurring ODD and GAD symptom groups: source-specific syndromes and cross-informant comorbidity. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 37, 314–326.PubMedCrossRef

Eddy, J. M., Dishion, T. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (1998). The analysis of intervention change in children and families: methodological and conceptual issues embedded in intervention studies. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 53–69.PubMedCrossRef

Farrell, A. D., Ampy, L. A., & Meyer, A. L. (1998). Identification and assessment of problematic interpersonal situations for urban adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 27, 293–305.PubMedCrossRef

Fournier, M. A., Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2008). Integrating dispositions, signatures, and the interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 531–545.PubMedCrossRef

Funder, D. C. (2009). Persons, behaviors and situations: an agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 120–126.CrossRef

Furr, R. M. (2009). Personality psychology as a truly behavioural science. European Journal of Personality, 23, 369–401.CrossRef

Granic, I., & Patterson, G. R. (2006). Toward a comprehensive model of antisocial development: a dynamic systems approach. Psychological Review, 113, 101–131.PubMedCrossRef

Gresham, F. M., & Elliot, S. N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

Gresham, F. M., Cook, C. R., Collins, T., Rasethwane, K., Dart, E., Truelson, E., et al. (2010). Developing a change-sensitive brief behavior rating scale as a progress monitoring tool for social behavior: an example using the Social Skills Rating System-Teacher Form. School Psychology Review, 39, 364–379.

Hartley, A. G., Zakriski, A. L., & Wright, J. C. (2011). Probing the depths of informant discrepancies: contextual influences on divergence and convergence. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 54–66.PubMedCrossRef

Haynes, S. N., Mumma, G. H., & Pinson, C. (2009). Idiographic assessment: conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 179–191.PubMedCrossRef

Hershberger, S. L., Plomin, R., & Pedersen, N. L. (1995). Traits and metatraits: their reliability, stability, and shared genetic influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 673–685.PubMedCrossRef

Hoffenaar, P. J., & Hoeksema, J. B. (2002). The structure of oppositionality: response dispositions and situational aspects. Journal of Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Health Disciplines, 43, 375–385.CrossRef

Kagan, J. (2001). The need for new constructs. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 84–103.CrossRef

Kazdin, A. E. (2006). Arbitrary metrics: implications for identifying evidence-based treatments. The American Psychologist, 61, 42–49.PubMedCrossRef

Kempes, M., Matthys, W., de Vries, H., & van Engeland, H. (2010). Children’s aggressive responses to neutral peer behavior: a form of unprovoked reactive aggression. Psychiatry Research, 176, 219–223.PubMedCrossRef

Ladd, G. W., & Profilet, S. M. (1996). The Child Behavior Scale: a teacher-report measure of young children’s aggressive, withdrawn, and prosocial behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 32, 1008–1024.CrossRef

Lewis, M. (2001). Issues in the study of personality development. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 67–83.CrossRef

Lutz, M. N., Fantuzzo, J., & McDermott, P. (2002). Multidimensional assessment of emotional and behavioral adjustment problems of low-income preschool children: development and initial validation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 338–355.CrossRef

Mash, E. J., & Hunsley, J. (2005). Evidence-based assessment of child and adolescent disorders: issues and challenges. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 362–379.PubMedCrossRef

Matthys, W., Maassen, G. H., Cuperus, J. M., & Van Engeland, H. (2001). The assessment of the situational specificity of children’s problem behaviour in peer-peer context. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 413–420.PubMedCrossRef

Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1990). Designing experiments and analyzing data. Belmont: Wadsworth.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1999). A Five-Factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford.

McDermott, P. A. (1993). National standardization of uniform multisituational measures of child and adolescent behavior pathology. Psychological Assessment, 5, 413–424.CrossRef

Measelle, J. R., John, O. P., Ablow, J. C., Cowan, P. A., & Cowan, C. P. (2005). Can children provide coherent, stable, and valid self-reports on the Big Five dimensions? A longitudinal study from ages 5 to 7. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 90–106.PubMedCrossRef

Mischel, W. (2009). From personality and assessment (1968) to personality science, 2009. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 282–290.CrossRef

Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246–268.PubMedCrossRef

National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network. (2003). Does amount of time spent in child care predict socioemotional adjustment during the transition to kindergarten? Child Development, 74, 976–1005.CrossRef

Nock, M. K., & Kurtz, S. M. S. (2005). Direct behavioral observation in school settings: bringing science to practice. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 12, 359–370.CrossRef

Noftle, E. E., & Fleeson, W. (2010). Age differences in big five behavior averages and variabilities across the adult life span: moving beyond retrospective, global summary accounts of personality. Psychology and Aging, 25, 95–107.PubMedCrossRef

Reynolds, C. R., & Kamphaus, R. W. (2002). Behavior assessment system for children (2nd ed.). Circle Pines: American Guidance Service.

Roberts, B. W., & Caspi, A. (2001). Personality development and the person-situation debate: it’s déjà vu all over again. Psychological Inquiry, 12, 104–109.CrossRef

Scotti, J. R., Morris, T. L., McNeil, C. B., & Hawkins, R. P. (1996). DSM-IV and disorders of childhood and adolescence: can structural criteria be functional? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1177–1191.PubMedCrossRef

Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Wright, J. C. (1994). Intraindividual stability in the organization and patterning of behavior: incorporating psychological situations into the idiographic analysis of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 674–687.PubMedCrossRef

Smith, R. E., Shoda, Y., Cumming, S. P., & Smoll, F. L. (2009). Behavioral signatures at the ballpark: intraindividual consistency of adults’ situation-behavior patterns and their interpersonal consequences. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 187–195.CrossRef

Tremblay, R. E. (2000). The development of aggressive behavior during childhood: what have we learned in the past century? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 129–141.CrossRef

Van Mechelen, I. (2009). A royal road to understanding the mechanisms underlying person-in-context behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 43, 179–186.CrossRef

Van Mechelen, I., & Kiers, H. A. L. (1999). Individual differences in anxiety responses to stressful situations: a three-mode component analysis model. European Journal of Personality, 13, 409–428.CrossRef

Vansteelandt, K., & Van Mechelen, I. (1998). Individual differences in situation-behavior profiles: a triple-typology model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 751–765.CrossRef

Volpe, R. J., DiPerna, J. C., Hintze, J. M., & Shapiro, E. S. (2005). Observing students in classroom settings: a review of seven coding schemes. School Psychology Review, 34, 454–474.

Walker, H. M., & McConnell, S. R. (1995). Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustment, adolescent version. NY: Wadsworth.

Weisz, J. R., Doss, A. J., & Hawley, K. M. (2005). Youth psychotherapy outcome research: a review and critique of the evidence base. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 337–363.PubMedCrossRef

Wright, J. C., & Mischel, W. (1987). A conditional approach to dispositional constructs: the local predictability of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1159–1177.PubMedCrossRef

Wright, J. C., & Zakriski, A. L. (2001). A contextual analysis of externalizing and mixed syndrome boys: when syndromal similarity obscures functional dissimilarity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 457–470.PubMedCrossRef

Wright, J. C., Zakriski, A. L., & Drinkwater, M. (1999). Developmental psychopathology and the reciprocal patterning of behavior and environment: distinctive situational and behavioral signatures of internalizing, externalizing, and mixed-syndrome children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 95–107.PubMedCrossRef

Wright, J. C., Lindgren, K. P., & Zakriski, A. L. (2001). Syndromal versus contextualized personality assessment: differentiating environmental and dispositional determinants of boys’ aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1176–1189.PubMedCrossRef

Zakriski, A. L., Wright, J. C., & Underwood, M. K. (2005). Gender similarities and differences in children’s social behavior: finding personality in contextualized patterns of adaptation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 844–855.PubMedCrossRef

Zakriski, A. L., Wright, J. C., & Cardoos, S. (2011). Evaluating deviancy training within residential treatment: Individual and group effects of peer-nominated deviant talk. Manuscript under review.

Titel: Reassessing the Assessment of Change in At-Risk Youth: Conflict and Coherence in Overall Versus Contextual Assessments of Behavior
Auteurs: Jack C. Wright
Audrey L. Zakriski
Anselma G. Hartley
Harry W. Parad
Publicatiedatum: 01-06-2011
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment / Uitgave 2/2011
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-011-9233-x

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 2/2011

Erratum to: The Nature of Generalized Anxiety in Older Primary Care Patients: Preliminary Findings

Characterizing Pathological Narcissism in Terms of the HEXACO Model of Personality

The Moderating Effect of Anxiety on Development in Atypically Developing Toddlers

Separation and Traumatic Distress in Prolonged Grief: The Role of Cause of Death and Relationship to the Deceased

A New Measure of the Maladaptive Self-Beliefs in Social Anxiety: Psychometric Properties in a Non-Clinical Sample

Analyzing the Utility of Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS) Warm-Up Segments