Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The combination of challenge and humor inherent in teasing creates an ambiguous situation that can either increase bonding or create tension in a relationship, depending on how the teasing is interpreted. Although it is well established that individuals with social anxiety interpret ambiguous social situations negatively, no research has examined how individuals with social anxiety react to and interpret teasing. Ninety undergraduate students with high (n = 56) and low (n = 34) levels of social anxiety read vignettes depicting teasing scenarios, and rated how they would feel and behave in the situations. Participants also completed a self-report measure of recalled childhood teasing. Compared to the low social anxiety group, participants in the high social anxiety group reported that they would experience more negative affect in response to the teasing scenarios, and interpreted the teasing scenarios as more malicious and mean-spirited. As well, participants in the high social anxiety group reported being more likely to change the behavior that was the focus of teasing (e.g., changing the way they dress if the focus of teasing was their outfits) compared to participants in the low social anxiety group. Recalled childhood teasing partially mediated group differences on negative affect and behavior change in response to the teasing scenarios. The present results are consistent with the information processing bias literature and have implications for the social functioning of individuals with high levels of social anxiety.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Alberts, J. K., Kellar-Guenther, Y., & Corman, S. (1996). That’s not funny: Understanding recipients’ responses to teasing. Language and Social Psychology, 25, 153–177.
Alden, L. E., Wiggins, J. S., & Pincus, L. S. (1990). Construction of circumplex scales for the inventory of interpersonal problems. Journal of Personality Assessment, 55, 521–536. PubMed
American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic statistical manual of mental disorders, Fourth Edition—text revision. Washington, DC: Author. CrossRef
Amir, N., Beard, C., & Bower, E. (2005). Interpretation bias and social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 433–443. CrossRef
Amir, N., Foa, E. B., & Coles, M. E. (1998). Negative interpretation bias in social phobia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 36, 945–957. CrossRef
Antony, M. M., Roth, D., Swinson, R. P., Huta, V., & Devins, G. M. (1998). Illness intrusiveness in individuals with panic disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder, or social phobia. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 5, 311–315. CrossRef
Aronson, E., Biegler, H., Bond, B., Clark, R. A., Drogos, K., & Garcia, M. A. (2007). Norms for teasing among college students. Communication Research Reports, 24, 169–176. CrossRef
Barnett, M. A., Burns, S. R., Sanborn, F. W., Bartel, J. S., & Wilds, S. J. (2004). Antisocial and prosocial teasing among children: Perceptions and individual differences. Social Development, 13, 292–310. CrossRef
Beck, S., Clabaugh, S. E., Clark, R. A., Kosovski, M. C., Daar, R., & Hefner, V. (2007). Teasing among college men and women. Communication Studies, 58, 157–172. CrossRef
Davila, J., & Beck, J. G. (2002). Is social anxiety associated with impairment in close relationships? A preliminary investigation. Behavior Therapy, 33, 427–444. CrossRef
Georgesen, J. C., Harris, M. J., Milich, R., & Young, J. (1999). “Just teasing”… Personality effects on perceptions and life narratives of childhood teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1254–1267. CrossRef
Gilbert, P., & Trower, P. (2001). Evolution and process in social anxiety. In W. R. Cozier & L. E. Alden (Eds.), International handbook of social anxiety: Concepts, research and interventions relating to the self and shyness (pp. 259–279). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Grills, A. E., & Ollendick, T. H. (2002). Peer victimization, global self-worth, and anxiety in middle-school children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 31, 59–68. PubMed
Hofmann, S. G. (2007). Cognitive factors that maintain social anxiety disorder: A comprehensive model and its treatment implications. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 36, 195–209. CrossRef
Huppert, J. D., Foa, E. B., Furr, J. M., Filip, J. C., & Mathews, A. (2003). Interpretation bias in social anxiety: A dimensional perspective. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 27, 569–577. CrossRef
Jones, D. C., & Newman, J. B. (2005). A three-factor model of teasing: The influence of friendship, gender, and topic on expected emotional reactions to teasing during early adolescence. Social Development, 14, 421–439. CrossRef
Kanai, Y., Sasagawa, S., Chen, J., Shimada, H., & Sakano, Y. (2010). Interpretation bias for ambiguous social behavior among individuals with high and low levels of social anxiety. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 34, 229–240. CrossRef
Keltner, D., Capps, L., Kring, A. M., Young, R. C., & Heerey, E. A. (2001). Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review. Psychology Bulletin, 127, 229–248. CrossRef
Kowalski, R. M. (2000). “I was only kidding”: Victims’ and perpetrators’ perceptions of teasing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 231–241. CrossRef
Kowalski, R. M. (2003). Complaining, teasing, and other annoying behaviors. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kowalski, R. M. (2004). Proneness to, perceptions of, and responses to teasing: The influence of both intrapersonal and interpersonal factors. European Journal of Personality, 18, 331–349. CrossRef
Meyer, J. C. (1997). Humor in member narratives: Uniting and dividing at work. Western Journal of Communication, 61, 188–208. CrossRef
Mills, C. B., & Babrow, A. S. (2003). Teasing as a means of social influence. Southern Communication Journal, 68, 273–286. CrossRef
Mills, C. B., & Carwile, A. M. (2009). The good, the bad, and the borderline: Separating teasing from bullying. Communication Education, 58, 276–301. CrossRef
Oliver, R., Hoover, J. H., & Hazler, R. (1994). The perceived roles of bullying in small-town midwestern schools. Journal of Counseling and Development, 72, 416–420. CrossRef
Olweus, D. (1997). Bully/victim problems in school: Facts and intervention. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 12, 495–510. CrossRef
Pillow, B. H., & Anderson, K. L. (2006). Children’s awareness of their own certainty and understanding of deduction and guessing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 823–849. CrossRef
Simmons, R. (2002). Odd girl out: The hidden culture of aggression in girls. New York, NY: Harcourt.
Storch, E. A., Roth, D. A., Coles, M. E., Heimberg, R. G., Bravata, E. A., & Moser, J. (2004). The measurement and impact of childhood teasing in a sample of young adults. Anxiety Disorders, 18, 681–684. CrossRef
Voncken, M. J., Bogels, S. M., & Peeters, F. (2007). Specificity of interpretation and judgmental biases in social phobia versus depression. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 80, 443–453. CrossRef
- Reactions to Teasing in Social Anxiety
Matilda E. Nowakowski
Martin M. Antony
- Springer US