Screening athletes to prevent cardiovascular events
Sudden cardiac death is often the first manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD), and is responsible for ≈50 % of the mortality of cardiovascular disease in developed countries [
1]. Regular physical exercise is recommended to reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and is gaining increased popularity, especially in middle-aged and older persons [
2]. Yet, exercise transiently increases the risk of cardiovascular events, particularly in those with unknown cardiac disease. More than 90 % of acute exercise-related cardiac events occur in men, predominantly those aged 45 years and over [
3]. While sudden cardiac death in younger athletes (35 years or younger) is mainly caused by cardiomyopathies, electrical heart disease and coronary anomalies, in older athletes it is predominantly caused by CAD (80 %) [
4].
A recent paper on cardiac arrest during long distance running implicated a causal role for demand ischaemia in athletes with (unknown) CAD [
2]. Absence of coronary plaque rupture in these persons was surprising because prior data [
5] and expert consensus documents [
4] have suggested that exercise-induced acute coronary events result from atherosclerotic plaque disruption and coronary thrombosis. It follows that early identification of CAD should be an important goal in the pre-participation evaluation of middle-aged persons.
Despite the rare occurrence of cardiac events in young athletes (<2 per 100,000 athletes per year) the study group of Sport Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommends mandatory pre-participation screening (based on medical history, physical examination and a resting electrocardiogram (ECG)) of athletes aged 35 years or younger [
6]. Directing screening efforts at the rapidly growing group of older athletes who have a 10-fold higher risk of exercise-related cardiac arrests [
3]—mainly attributable to CAD—should be considered as well [
7].
The 2011 ESC position paper on cardiovascular evaluation of middle-aged/senior individuals engaged in leisure time sports activities advocates the use of maximal exercise testing. This is now frequently performed in the course of a sports medical examination (SME), in addition to medical history, physical examination, and the resting ECG [
8].
Cardiovascular event risk: exercise testing and cardiac imaging to detect coronary artery disease
Traditionally, risk scores such as the ESC Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) are used to estimate cardiovascular event risk in asymptomatic persons, aiming to divide them into low, intermediate and high risk categories. The SCORE risk categories correspond to 0–4 %, 5–9 % and 10 % or higher 10-year cardiovascular mortality risk [
9]. Cardiovascular risk scores have not specifically been developed for persons who are physically active. As exercise favourably influences cardiovascular risk factors, e.g. by reducing weight and blood pressure and improving the lipid profile, traditional cardiovascular risk scores may underestimate CV risk in persons who exercise regularly [
10]. It has also been suggested that regular, intense physical exercise (e.g. multiple marathon running) in itself may be harmful to the heart by causing myocardial fibrosis [
11] and by contributing to coronary artery plaque formation with cardiovascular events occurring at an alarmingly high rate (21 % 10-year event rate) in a group of 108 recreational German marathon runners aged 50 years or older [
10]. Cardiovascular events exclusively occurred in those with a coronary calcium score (CACS) higher than 100 Agatston units (AU).
Adding maximal exercise testing to the cardiovascular evaluation of middle-aged/senior athletes, as advocated by the ESC, may be useful to identify some persons at high risk, by detecting a physiologically significant coronary artery stenosis [
12]. Several studies have indicated that asymptomatic men with an abnormal exercise test received the greatest benefits of interventions to reduce risk factors [
13]. Notwithstanding the low predictive value (high false-negative rate) for CAD of both resting and exercise electrocardiography in asymptomatic individuals, exercise testing is still frequently performed in the course of a sports medical check-up [
14]. This is partly attributable to the fact that the results of exercise testing will also provide information on cardiorespiratory fitness relevant to recommendations for subsequent training programs.
Coronary CT (CCT) can be of added value by providing a minimally invasive opportunity to image the coronary arteries for coronary artery calcium (CAC), atherosclerotic burden and coronary stenosis [
15].
Non-contrast CCT for the assessment of CAC provides a non-invasive direct measure of burden of coronary atherosclerosis and is an independent predictor of cardiovascular events [
16]. The CACS is the most powerful cardiac risk prognosticator in the asymptomatic population, with consistent superiority to all risk factor-based scores [
17]. Absence of CAC is associated with a very low risk of future cardiovascular events in asymptomatic as well as symptomatic individuals [
18]. The amount of CAC, however, relates poorly to the degree of luminal narrowing of the coronary arteries and a low CACS does not exclude CAD [
19,
20]. The ‘Agatston Score’ remains the most commonly used measure to quantify CAC because most previous large-scale trials and cross-sectional studies used this method, so that large reference datasets exist (e.g.
http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org/Calcium) [
21]. Coronary artery calcification is age, gender, and race dependent. Agatston scores are often classified into five groups according to severity as listed in Table
1 [
22]. A score <100 Agatston units (AU) is ranked as low risk, scores between 100 and 400 AU as intermediate (moderate) and above 400 AU as severe risk of future atherosclerotic cardiovascular events [
22]. CACS is increasingly used as a tool to expand risk stratification in asymptomatic persons with an intermediate risk of cardiovascular events [
23]. The low number needed to screen in the general population to identify an individual with moderate or severe CAC (8 and 20 respectively) seems to provide a justification for extending CAC testing to lower risk individuals [
16] as CAC is also associated with risk of cardiovascular events among individuals with few or no risk factors. The 5-year number needed to treat to prevent a cardiovascular event in persons with a CACS ≥100 AU is low (19) [
24] compared with the 5-year number needed to treat to prevent a cardiovascular event in patients with mild to moderate (140–160 mmHg) hypertension (122 to 135) [
25].
Table 1
Classification of coronary calcium score
0 | Absent |
>0 < 10 | Minimal |
≥10 < 100 | Mild |
≥100 < 400 | Moderate |
≥400 < 1000 | Severe |
≥1000 | Extensive |
Coronary CT angiography
Low-dose coronary CT angiography (CCTA) can visualise, qualify (calcified, non-calcified, mixed plaques), and quantify (total atherosclerotic burden, degree of luminal stenosis) CAD and is increasingly used to rule out CAD in persons presenting with chest pain. The diagnostic accuracy of CCTA is high, regardless of risk profile [
26]. In the near future CT fractional flow reserve is likely to provide information on the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis [
27]. The vulnerable plaque paradigm states that plaque composition is a better predictor of acute coronary events than stenosis grade [
28]. As athletes normally have a lower heart rate and BMI, they are suitable candidates for low radiation dose (2–3 millisievert—mSv) CCTA to determine the presence and extent of CAD. This dose corresponds to the yearly background radiation each person receives in Europe [
29]. Furthermore, a recent position paper that analysed acute and long-term composite risks related to cardiovascular imaging showed that life-time risk of imaging procedures for fatal events is small compared with the general risk of fatal cardiac events by CAD in both asymptomatic and symptomatic populations [
30].