Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The assessment of quality of life (QOL) is key within pediatric oncology and requires a clearly defined construct of QOL. The purpose of our study was: (1) to conduct a qualitative study to inform the theoretical underpinnings of QOL and (2) to determine the appropriateness of patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to assess and evaluate QOL in pediatric cancer patients and survivors.
The study used an interpretative description approach. Children diagnosed with childhood cancer, aged 8–18 years, were recruited from four Canadian hospitals. Semi‐structured interviews were completed, transcribed verbatim and coded through methods of constant comparison. In-depth analysis facilitated a comparison between emerging themes and the content of commonly used PRO instruments.
Thirty-seven children (19 females; 51 %) participated. The mean age was 13 years, and 19 (51 %) participants were post-treatment. Participant experiences reflected notions of positive and negative duality, including: maintaining physical functioning but longing for the ability to participate in activities; experiencing a new level of intimacy with family and friends amidst isolation; and developing positivity amidst anger, sadness and lingering worry. Analysis showed that existing PRO instruments are missing concerns specific to this population and contain content not reflective of the QOL experiences of childhood cancer patients and survivors.
Our research highlights important problems with content validity of existing PRO scales, indicating that the tools we have to date have limited utility in research and clinical practice. The development of a new PRO instrument should be considered to ensure that content validity is achieved.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Thorne, S. (2008). Interpretive description. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
QSR International. (2010). NVivo10. QSR International Pty Ltd. www.qsrinternational.com
Lincoln, Y. S. (1995). Emerging criteria for qualitative and interpretive research. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 275–289. CrossRef
Erlandson, D., Harris, E., Skipper, B. L., & Allen, S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
http://www.ispor.org/workpaper/FDA%20PRO%20Guidance.pdf. Accessed 22 July 2012.Department of Health. Equity and excellence: Liberating the NHS. London, 2010
Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., et al. (2011). Content validity–establishing and reporting the evidence in newly developed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments for medical product evaluation: ISPOR PRO Good Research Practices Task Force report: Part 2–assessing respondent understanding. Value Health, 14, 978–988. CrossRefPubMed
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Danish Institute for Education Research.
Hobart, J., & Cano, S. (2009). Improving the evaluation of therapeutic intervention in MS: The role of new psychometric methods. Health Technology Assessment, 13, 1–200. CrossRef
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Quality of life measures in chronic diseases of childhood. Health Technology Assessment, 5(4), i-156. CrossRef
Social Development Canada. (2004). A Canada fit for children. Retrieved June 7, 2009, from http://www.hrsdc.gc.ca/en/cs/sp/sdc/socpol/publications/2002-002483/canadafite.pdf
Fayad, N., Schiariti, V., Bostan, C., Cieza, A., & Klassen, A. (2011). Health status and qol instruments used in childhood cancer research: Deciphering conceptual content using World Health Organization definitions. Quality of Life Research, 20, 1247–1258. CrossRef
- Quality of life of pediatric oncology patients: Do patient-reported outcome instruments measure what matters to patients?
Samantha J. Anthony
Robert J. Klaassen
Anne F. Klassen
- Springer International Publishing