Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The diagnosis of prostate cancer and the following treatment does not only affect the patient, but also his partner. Partners often suffer even more severely from psychological distress than the patients themselves. This analysis aims to describe the quality of life (QoL) after the cancer diagnosis over time and to identify the effects of possible predictors of partners’ quality of life in a German study population.
Patients with localised prostate cancer and their partners were recruited from a prospective multicenter study in Germany, the Prostate Cancer, Sexuality, and Partnership (ProCaSP) Study. At five observation times during the follow-up period of 2 years after diagnosis, QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30) and personal, social, and cancer-related health factors as well as adaptation and coping factors of 293 couples were observed and analysed with mixed effects analysis.
The men’s prostate cancer diagnosis had a small, but significant impact on their partner’s QoL. However, QoL of partners was most affected by the partners’ own physical health and psychological condition, time, and their relationship quality.
The finding that average QoL increased again 3 months after diagnosis and later should give partners faith and hope for the future. The identified most important predictors of partners’ QoL are potentially susceptible to intervention, and further research on target groups in special need of support and on adequate interventions is needed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Robert Koch Institute and the Association of Population-based Cancer Registries in Germany (2012). Cancer in Germany 2007/2008. Incidence and trends, 8 ed. Berlin.
The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment. (1995). (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Social Science and Medicine,41(10), 1403–1409. CrossRef
Applebaum, A. J., et al. (2013). Preliminary study of themes of meaning and psychosocial service use among informal cancer caregivers. Palliative & Supportive Care, 1–10. doi: 10.1017/S1478951513000084.
Street, A. F., et al. (2010). Psychosocial adaptation in female partners of men with prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl),19(2), 234–242. CrossRef
Wadhwa, D., et al. (2013). Quality of life and mental health in caregivers of outpatients with advanced cancer. Psychooncology,22(2), 403–410. PubMed
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Berlin: Springer Publishing Company.
Malcarne, V. L., et al. (2002). Problem-solving skills and emotional distress in spouses of men with prostate cancer. Journal of Cancer Education,17(3), 150–154. PubMed
Wittekind, C., Meyer, H.-J., & Bootz, F. (Eds.). (2002). In UICC: TNM Klassifikation maligner Tumoren (6th ed). Berlin: Springer.
Fayers, P., et al. (2001). The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd ed.). Brussels: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
Osoba, D., et al. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology,16(1), 139–144. PubMed
Goldzweig, G., et al. (2009). Gender and psychological distress among middle- and older-aged colorectal cancer patients and their spouses: an unexpected outcome. Critical Reviews in Oncology Hematology,70(1), 71–82. CrossRef
Bestmann, B., et al. (2007). Prostate-specific symptoms of prostate cancer in a German general population. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Disease,10(1), 52–59. CrossRef
Rabin, R. et al. (2011). EQ- 5D- 3L User Guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ- 5D- 3L instrument. Version 4.0, EuroQol Group: Rotterdam.
R Development Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
van Buuren, S., & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). MICE: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.
Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Development Core Team. (2013). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-113.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., & Bolker, B. (2013). lme4: Linear mixed- effects models using S4 classes. R package version 1.0-5. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4.
Baayen, R. H. (2011). languageR: Data sets and functions with “ Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics”. R package version 1.4. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=languageR.
Bartlett, J. W., Frost, C., & Carpenter, J. R. (2011). Multiple imputation models should incorporate the outcome in the model of interest. Brain,134(Pt 11), 189. author reply e190. CrossRef
Schafer, J. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman & Hall. CrossRef
- Quality of life in partners of patients with localised prostate cancer
- Springer International Publishing