Public Perception of Autism Treatments: The Role of Credibility and Evidence | mijn-bsl Skip to main content

Mijn bibliotheek

Shop

Nieuws
Boeken
Tijdschriften
E-learning
Web-tv
Video
Audio

Tips voor Mijn BSL

UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 5/2019

14-01-2019 | OriginalPaper

Public Perception of Autism Treatments: The Role of Credibility and Evidence

Auteurs: Veronica P. Fleury, Greg Trevors, Panayiota Kendeou

Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders | Uitgave 5/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

We explored the influence of credibility and evidence on public perceptions of ASD treatments using survey methodology. Participants (N = 379) read texts about different ASD treatments. The text presentation was based on a 2 × 2 within-subjects factorial design with treatment status [evidence based practices (EBP) vs. non-EBP] and source credibility in the text (credible vs. non-credible) as the independent variables. An instructional manipulation condition served as a between subjects factor. Respondents were more familiar with non-EBPs than EBPs, but viewed EBPs as being more credible and were more likely to endorse them compared to pseudoscientific practices. Interactions between source credibility and instructional manipulation were found on ratings of credibility and recommendation of both EBP and non-EBP texts. Implications of these findings are discussed.
vorige artikel Sustained Community Implementation of JASPER Intervention with Toddlers with Autism
volgende artikel Transactional Relations Between Parenting Stress and Child Autism Symptoms and Behavior Problems
Literatuur
Appel, M., & Mara, M. (2013). The persuasive influence of a fictional character’s trustworthiness. Journal of Communication, 63, 912–932.
Bondy, A., & Frost, L. (1994). The picture-exchange communication system. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 9, 1–19. CrossRef
Braasch, J. L. G., Rouet, J., Vibert, N., & Britt, A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory and Cognition, 40, 450–465. CrossRefPubMed
Britt, A., & Aglinksi, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522. CrossRef
Earixson, D., & Fleury, V. P. (2018). Fads and facts: Pseudoscientific approaches to “Treating” autism. In Poster presented at the meeting of division for early childhood annual international conference on young children with special needs and their families. Orlando, FL
ESSA. (2015–2016). Every student succeeds act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Coyne, M., Greenwood, C., & Innocenti, M. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164.
Goldman, S., Braasch, J., Wiley, J., Graesser, A., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 356–381.
Hanson, E., Kalish, L. A., Bunce, E., Curtis, C., McDaniel, S., Ware, J., & Petry, J. (2007). Use of complementary and alternative medicine among children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders., 37(4), 628–636. CrossRefPubMed
Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–180.
IDEA. (2004). Individuals with disabilities education improvement act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
Jacobson, J. W., Mulick, J. A., & Schwartz, A. A. (1995). A history of facilitated communication: Science, pseudoscience, and antiscience science working group on facilitated communication. American Psychologist, 50(9), 750–765. CrossRef
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow (Vol. 1). New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Kobayashi, K. (2014). Students’ consideration of source information during the reading of multiple texts and its effect on intertextual conflict resolution. Instructional Science, 42, 183–205. CrossRef
Levy, S. E., & Hyman, S. L. (2008). Complementary and alternative medicine treatments for children with autism spectrum disorders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 17(4), 803–820. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Levy, S. E., Mandell, D. S., Merhar, S., Ittenbach, R. F., & Pinto-Martin, J. A. (2003). Use of complementary and alternative medicine among children recently diagnosed with autistic spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics, 24(6), 418–423. CrossRef
Lombardi, D., Seyranian, V., & Sinatra, G. (2014). Source effects and plausibility judgments when reading about climate change. Discourse Processes, 51(1–2), 75–92. CrossRef
McCoy, A., Holloway, J., Healy, O., Rispoli, M., & Neely, L. (2016). A systematic review and evaluation of video modeling, role-play and computer-based instruction as social skills interventions for children and adolescents with high-functioning autism. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 3, 48–67. CrossRef
McIntyre, N., Mundy, P. C., Solomon, M., Hatt, N. V., Gwaltney, M., Jarrold, W., & Kim, K. (2013). Reading and oral communication in students with ASD. In Paper presented at the international meeting on autism research. San Sebastian, Spain.
National Autism Center. (2009). National standards project findings and conclusions. Randolph, MA: National Autism Center.
Reichow, B., & Volkmar, F. R. (2010). Social skills interventions for individuals with autism: Evaluation for evidence-based practices within a best evidence synthesis framework. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(2), 149–166. CrossRefPubMed
Smith, T. (2016). The appeal of unvalidated treatments. In R. M. Foxx & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 3–16). New York: Routledge.
Sparks, J., & Rapp, D. (2011). Readers’ reliance on source credibility in the service of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(1), 230–247. PubMed
Strømsø, H., Bråten, I., & Britt, A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20, 192–204. CrossRef
Strømsø, H. I., & Bråten, I. (2014). Students’ sourcing while reading and writing from multiple web documents. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 9(02), 92–111.
Travers, J. C., Ayers, K., Simpson, R. L., & Crutchfield, S. (2016). Fad, pseudoscientific, and controversial interventions. In R. Lang, T. Hancock & N. Singh (Eds.), Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder. Evidence-based practices in behavioral health. Cham: Springer.
Van Boekel, M., Lassonde, K., O’Brien, E. J., & Kendeou, P. (2017). Source credibility and the processing of refutation texts. Memory & Cognition, 45, 168–181. CrossRef
Vyse, S. (2016). Where to fads come from? In R. M. Foxx & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for autism and intellectual disabilities: Fad, fashion, and science in professional practice (pp. 3–16). New York: Routledge.
Warren, Z., Veenstra-VanderWeele, J., Stone, W., Bruzek, J. L., Nahmias, A. S., Foss-Feig, J. H., … McPheeters, M. L. (2011). Therapies for children with autism spectrum disorders. Comparative effectiveness review No. 26. (Prepared by the Vanderbilt Evidence-based Practice Center under contract no. 290-02-HHSA-290-2007 -10065-I.) AHRQ publication no. 11-EHC029-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare. Retrieved August 3, 2018, from http://​www.​effectivehealthc​are.​ahrq.​gov/​reports/​final.​cfm.
Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2014). Evidence-based practice for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute.
Zimmer, M., Desch, L., Rosen, L. D., Bailey, M. L., Becker, D., Culbert, T. P., … Adams, R. C. (2012). Sensory integration therapies for children with developmental and behavioral disorders. Pediatrics, 129(6), 1186–1189. CrossRefPubMed
Metagegevens
Titel
Public Perception of Autism Treatments: The Role of Credibility and Evidence
Auteurs
Veronica P. Fleury
Greg Trevors
Panayiota Kendeou
Publicatiedatum
14-01-2019
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders / Uitgave 5/2019
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-018-03868-z

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2019

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 5/2019 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Gender Differences in Pragmatic Communication in School-Aged Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)

OriginalPaper

Preschool Staff Spot Social Communication Difficulties, But Not Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Young Autistic Children

OriginalPaper

Temperament Similarities and Differences: A Comparison of Factor Structures from the Behavioral Style Questionnaire in Children with and Without Autism Spectrum Disorder

Brief Report

Brief Report: Evaluation of the Short Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT-10) as a Brief Screen for Autism Spectrum Disorder in a High-Risk Sibling Cohort

Original Paper

Stop Making Noise! Auditory Sensitivity in Adults with an Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnosis: Physiological Habituation and Subjective Detection Thresholds

Original Paper

A Randomised Controlled Feasibility Trial of Immersive Virtual Reality Treatment with Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Specific Phobias in Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder