01-08-2006 | Erratum
Psychosocial Resources in First-Year University Students: The Role of Identity Processes and Social Relationships
Auteurs: Gerald R. Adams, Michael D. Berzonsky, Leo Keating
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Youth and Adolescence | Uitgave 4/2006
Log in om toegang te krijgenshare
DELEN
Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)
-
Optie A:
-
Optie B:Deel de link per e-mail
Extract
In the article “Psychosocial Resources in First-Year University Students: The Role of Identity Processes and Social Relationships,” by Gerald R. Adams, Michael D. Berzonsky, and Leo Keating (Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 2006,
Vol. 35, No.1, pp. 81–91), the columns in Table 1 (p. 86) and Table 2 (p. 88) are labeled incorrectly. The first column in each Table should refer to variable A (Family cohesion), the second to variable B (Family expressiveness), and so forth.
…
Table 1
Intercorrelations of the family, university relations, identity style, identity status, and psychosocial resources variables
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
I
|
J
|
K
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A
|
Family Cohesion
|
|||||||||||
B
|
Family Expressiveness
|
0.62**
|
||||||||||
C
|
Family Conflict
|
−0.64**
|
−0.41**
|
|||||||||
D
|
University Relations
|
0.08
|
0.04
|
−0.07
|
||||||||
E
|
Diffuse-Avoidance
|
−0.10
|
−0.17**
|
0.05
|
−0.12*
|
|||||||
F
|
Informational Style
|
0.06
|
0.05
|
−0.06
|
0.12*
|
−0.21**
|
||||||
G
|
Normative Style
|
0.24**
|
0.03
|
−0.16**
|
0.01
|
0.14**
|
0.02
|
|||||
H
|
Diffuse Status
|
−0.11*
|
−0.09
|
0.07
|
−0.07
|
0.15**
|
−0.05
|
−0.22**
|
||||
I
|
Foreclosed Status
|
0.10
|
−0.05
|
−0.05
|
0.06
|
0.19**
|
−0.15**
|
0.37**
|
0.06
|
|||
J
|
Moratorium Status
|
−0.18**
|
−0.11*
|
0.11*
|
−0.04
|
0.14**
|
0.01
|
−0.27**
|
0.41**
|
0.09
|
||
K
|
Achieved Status
|
−0.02
|
0.02
|
0.02
|
0.09
|
−0.23**
|
0.16**
|
0.07
|
−0.17**
|
−0.16**
|
−0.22**
|
|
L
|
Psychosocial Resources
|
0.33**
|
0.24**
|
−0.24**
|
0.16**
|
−0.35**
|
0.27**
|
0.04
|
−0.28**
|
−0.19**
|
−0.37**
|
0.29**
|
* p < 0.05.
** p < 0.01.
Table 2
Standardized indirect effects
A
|
B
|
C
|
D
|
E
|
F
|
G
|
H
|
I
|
J
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A
|
Family Cohesion
|
||||||||||
B
|
Family Expressiveness
|
||||||||||
C
|
University Relationships
|
||||||||||
D
|
Diffuse-Avoidance
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
E
|
Informational Style
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
F
|
Normative Style
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
G
|
Diffuse Status
|
−0.09
|
0.02
|
−0.02
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
H
|
Foreclosed Status
|
0.14
|
−0.09
|
−0.03
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
I
|
Moratorium Status
|
−0.09
|
0.03
|
−0.02
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
J
|
Achieved Status
|
—
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
K
|
Psychosocial Resources
|
0.04
|
0.04
|
0.06
|
−0.09
|
0.03
|
0.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|