Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

03-04-2021

Psychometric properties of two abbreviated Connor–Davidson Resilience scales in Chinese infertile couples

Tijdschrift:: Quality of Life Research

Auteurs:: Xuekun Zhang, Yuanyuan Mo, Chunxia Yan, Yang Li, Huiling Li

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Xuekun Zhang, Yuanyuan Mo have contributed equally to this paper.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the 10-item and 2-item Connor–Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the agreement between these two versions, and the measurement invariance of the CD-RISC-10 across genders in Chinese infertile couples.

Methods

A total of 170 infertile couples were enrolled from an infertility outpatient clinic between September 2019 and January 2020. The CD-RISC scores were tested for floor and ceiling effects. Reliability was evaluated by calculating Cronbach’s α. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed by bivariate correlations between resilience and infertility-related stress, depression, anxiety, and two divergent variables. Agreement between the two versions was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman analysis. A multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to assess the measurement equivalence of CD-RISC-10 across genders.

Results

No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Internal consistencies of CD-RISC-10 and CD-RISC-2 were 0.91 and 0.63, respectively. The CFA analysis indicated an excellent model fit for a one-factor structure of CD-RISC-10 (TLI > 0.950, CFI > 0.950, RMSEA < 0.060). Both scales displayed good convergent and divergent validity, and the agreement between them was significant with an ICC of 0.80 (95% CI ranging from 0.76 to 0.84). Measurement invariance across genders was supported by multigroup CFA, and a higher level of resilience was found in men than in women.

Conclusion

Our findings showed significant reliability, validity, and stability of CD-RISC-10 and acceptable internal consistency and validity of CD-RISC-2. CD-RISC-10 is recommended as a resilience measure in clinical evaluations of infertile patients.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Meer informatie

Vander Borght, M., & Wyns, C. (2018). Fertility and infertility: Definition and epidemiology. Clinical Biochemistry, 62, 2–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.03.012 CrossRefPubMed

Meng, Q., Ren, A., Zhang, L., Liu, J., Li, Z., Yang, Y., et al. (2015). Incidence of infertility and risk factors of impaired fecundity among newly married couples in a Chinese population. Reproductive Biomedicine Online, 30(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.10.002 CrossRefPubMed

Ergin, R. N., Polat, A., Kars, B., Oztekin, D., Sofuoglu, K., & Caliskan, E. (2018). Social stigma and familial attitudes related to infertility. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 15(1), 46–49. https://doi.org/10.4274/tjod.04307 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Nahar, P., & van der Geest, S. (2014). How women in Bangladesh confront the stigma of childlessness: agency, resilience, and resistance. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 28(3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12094 CrossRefPubMed

Peters, K., Jackson, D., & Rudge, T. (2011). Surviving the adversity of childlessness: Fostering resilience in couples. Contemporary Nurse, 40(1), 130–140. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.2011.40.1.130 CrossRefPubMed

Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003). Development of a new resilience scale: the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). Depression and Anxiety, 18(2), 76–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.10113 CrossRefPubMed

Bonanno, G. A. (2008). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. S(1),101-113. https://doi.org/10.1037/1942-9681.S.1.101 CrossRef

Davydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010). Resilience and mental health. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(5), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003 CrossRefPubMed

Shin, Y., Kim, S. M., Kim, H., Min, K. J., Yoo, S., Kim, E., et al. (2019). Resilience as a protective factor for depressive mood and anxiety among Korean employees. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 34(27), e188. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e188 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Gameiro, S., van den Belt-Dusebout, A. W., Smeenk, J. M. J., Braat, D. D. M., van Leeuwen, F. E., & Verhaak, C. M. (2016). Women’s adjustment trajectories during IVF and impact on mental health 11–17 years later. Human Reproduction, 31(8), 1788–1798. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew131 CrossRefPubMed

11.

Herrmann, D., Scherg, H., Verres, R., von Hagens, C., Strowitzki, T., & Wischmann, T. (2011). Resilience in infertile couples acts as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28(11), 1111–1117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-011-9637-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Chochovski, J., Moss, S. A., & Charman, D. P. (2013). Recovery after unsuccessfulin vitro fertilization: the complex role of resilience and marital relationships. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34(3), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2013.829034 CrossRef

13.

Yu, Y., Peng, L., Chen, L., Long, L., He, W., Li, M., et al. (2014). Resilience and social support promote posttraumatic growth of women with infertility: The mediating role of positive coping. Psychiatry Research, 215(2), 401–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.10.032 CrossRefPubMed

14.

Li, Y., Zhang, X., Shi, M., Guo, S., & Wang, L. (2019). Resilience acts as a moderator in the relationship between infertility-related stress and fertility quality of life among women with infertility: a cross-sectional study. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 17(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1099-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Windle, G., Bennett, K. M., & Noyes, J. (2011). A methodological review of resilience measurement scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 9(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-9-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

16.

Sexton, M. B., Byrd, M. R., & von Kluge, S. (2010). Measuring resilience in women experiencing infertility using the CD-RISC: Examining infertility-related stress, general distress, and coping styles. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44(4), 236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.06.007 CrossRefPubMed

17.

Khoshouei, M. S. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) using Iranian students. International Journal of Testing, 9(1), 60–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305050902733471 CrossRef

18.

Yu, X., & Zhang, J. (2007). Factor analysis and psychometric evaluation of the Conner-Davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC) with Chinese people. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2007.35.1.19 CrossRef

19.

Campbell-Sills, L., & Stein, M. B. (2007). Psychometric analysis and refinement of the connor–davidson resilience scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(6), 1019–1028. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20271 CrossRefPubMed

20.

Goins, R. T., Gregg, J. J., & Fiske, A. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale with older American Indians. Research on Aging, 35(2), 123–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027511431989 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

21.

Sharma, S., Pathak, A., Abbott, J. H., & Jensen, M. P. (2018). Measurement properties of the Nepali version of the Connor Davidson resilience scales in individuals with chronic pain. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 16(1), 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-0884-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

22.

Wang, L., Shi, Z., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in Chinese earthquake victims. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 64(5), 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2010.02130.x CrossRefPubMed

23.

Cheng, C., Dong, D., He, J., Zhong, X., & Yao, S. (2020). Psychometric properties of the 10-item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-10) in Chinese undergraduates and depressive patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 261, 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.018 CrossRefPubMed

24.

Vaishnavi, S., Connor, K., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2007). An abbreviated version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), the CD-RISC2: Psychometric properties and applications in psychopharmacological trials. Psychiatry Research, 152(2–3), 293–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2007.01.006 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

25.

Ni, M. Y., Li, T. K., Yu, N. X., Pang, H., Chan, B. H. Y., Leung, G. M., et al. (2016). Normative data and psychometric properties of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) and the abbreviated version (CD-RISC2) among the general population in Hong Kong. Quality of Life Research, 25(1), 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-015-1072-x CrossRefPubMed

26.

Kuiper, H., van Leeuwen, C. C. M., Stolwijk-Swüste, J. M., & Post, M. W. M. (2019). Measuring resilience with the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): which version to choose? Spinal Cord, 57(5), 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-019-0240-1 CrossRefPubMed

27.

Vatanparast, M., Ardekani, S. M. Y., Anvari, M., Kalantari, A., Yaghmaie, F., & Royani, Z. (2020). Resilience as the predictor of quality of life in the infertile couples as the most neglected and silent minorities. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology,1–12, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1843613 CrossRefPubMed

28.

Abolghasemi, A., Rajabi, S., Sheikhi, M., Kiamarsi, A., & Sadrolmamaleki, V. (2013). Comparison of resilience, positive/negative affect, and psychological vulnerability between Iranian infertile and fertile men. Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 7(1), 9–15. PubMedPubMedCentral

29.

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 CrossRef

30.

Pulido-Martos, M., Fernández-Sánchez, M. D., & Lopez-Zafra, E. (2020). Measurement invariance across gender and age in the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) in a Spanish general population. Quality of Life Research, 29(5), 1373–1384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02389-1 CrossRefPubMed

31.

Zegers-Hochschild, F., Adamson, G. D., Dyer, S., Racowsky, C., de Mouzon, J., Sokol, R., et al. (2017). The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertility and Sterility, 108(3), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005 CrossRefPubMed

32.

Newton, C. R., Sherrard, W., & Glavac, I. (1999). The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertility and Sterility, 72(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00164-8 CrossRefPubMed

33.

Peng, T., Coates, R., Merriman, G., Zhao, Y., & Maycock, B. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of Mandarin version of the fertility problem inventory (M-FPI) in an infertile Chinese sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 32(4), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2011.609950 CrossRef

34.

Tong, X., An, D., McGonigal, A., Park, S., & Zhou, D. (2016). Validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among Chinese people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 120, 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.019 CrossRefPubMed

35.

Yuan, J., Ding, R., Wang, L., Sheng, L., Li, J., & Hu, D. (2019). Screening for depression in acute coronary syndrome patients: A comparison of Patient Health Questionnaire-9 versus Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 121, 24–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.03.018 CrossRefPubMed

36.

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 CrossRefPubMed

37.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118 CrossRef

38.

Meredith, W., & Teresi, J. A. (2006). An essay on measurement and factorial invariance. Medical Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S69–S77. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000245438.73837.89 CrossRefPubMed

39.

Meade, A. W., Johnson, E. C., & Braddy, P. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fitindices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568 CrossRef

40.

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

41.

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1986). Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, 1(8476), 307–310. CrossRef

42.

Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7(2), 147–177. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.2.147 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Shin, G., Choi, K., Jeong, K. S., Min, Y., Ahn, Y., & Kim, M. (2018). Psychometric properties of the 10-item Conner-Davidson resilience scale on toxic chemical-exposed workers in South Korea. Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 30, 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40557-018-0265-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

44.

Kline, R. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.3rd ed. New York: Guilford publications.

45.

Hwang, Y. I. J., Arnold, S., Trollor, J., & Uljarević, M. (2020). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the brief Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale for adults on the autism spectrum. Autism, 24(6):1572-1577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361320908095 CrossRefPubMed

46.

Jeong, H. S., Kang, I., Namgung, E., Im, J. J., Jeon, Y., Son, J., et al. (2015). Validation of the Korean version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale-2 in firefighters and rescue workers. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 59, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.01.006 CrossRefPubMed

47.

Meng, M., He, J., Guan, Y., Zhao, H., Yi, J., Yao, S., et al. (2019). Factorial invariance of the 10-Item Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale across gender among Chinese elders. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1237. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01237 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

48.

Okuyama, J., Funakoshi, S., Tomita, H., Yamaguchi, T., & Matsuoka, H. (2018). Longitudinal characteristics of resilience among adolescents: A high school student cohort study to assess the psychological impact of the Great East Japan Earthquake. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 72(11), 821–835. https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.12772 CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Psychometric properties of two abbreviated Connor–Davidson Resilience scales in Chinese infertile couples
Auteurs:: Xuekun Zhang
Yuanyuan Mo
Chunxia Yan
Yang Li
Huiling Li
Publicatiedatum: 03-04-2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02820-6
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Tijdschrift: Quality of Life Research An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation - An Official Journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip