Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The items for the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales are available from Thomas R. Kwapil.
The Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales are widely used for assessing schizotypy in nonclinical and clinical samples. However, they were developed using classical test theory (CTT) and have not had their psychometric properties examined with more sophisticated measurement models. The present study employed item response theory (IRT) as well as traditional CTT to examine psychometric properties of four of the schizotypy scales on the item and scale level, using a large sample of undergraduate students (n = 6,137). In addition, we investigated differential item functioning (DIF) for sex and ethnicity. The analyses revealed many strengths of the four scales, but some items had low discrimination values and many items had high DIF. The results offer useful guidance for applied users and for future development of these scales.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington: AERA.
DeVellis, R. F. (2012). Scale development: Theory and applications (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.
Eckblad, M., Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Mishlove, M. (1982). The revised social Anhedonia scale. Unpublished test (copies available from T. R. Kwapil, Department of Psychology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, P.O. Box 26170 Greensboro, NC 27402–6170).
Graves, R. E., & Weinstein, S. (2004). A rasch analysis of three of the Wisconsin scales of psychosis proneness: measurement of schizotypy. Journal of Applied Measurement, 5, 160–171. PubMed
Jackson, D. N. (1970). A sequential system for personality scale development. In C. D. Spielberger (Ed.), Current topics in clinical and community psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 61–96). San Diego: Academic.
Mason, O., Claridge, G., & Jackson, M. (1995). New scales for the assessment of schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 7–13. CrossRef
Meehl, P. E. (1990). Toward an integrated theory of schizotaxia, schizotypy, and schizophrenia. Journal of Personality Disorders, 4, 1–99. CrossRef
Raine, A. (1991). The SPQ: a scale for the assessment of schizotypal personality based on DSM-III-R criteria. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 17, 555–564. PubMed
Reise, S. P. (1990). A comparison of item-and person-fit methods of assessing model-data fit in IRT. Applied Psychological Measurement, 14, 127–137. CrossRef
Roussos, L. A., & Stout, W. F. (1996). Simulation studies of the effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel type I error performances. Journal of Educational Measurement, 33, 215–230. CrossRef
Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2010). Aberrant asociality: How individual differences in social Anhedonia illuminate the need to belong. Journal of Personality. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00702.x
Stout, W., & Roussos, L. (1999). Dimensionality-based DIF/DBF package [Computer program]. Champaign-Urbana: William Stout Institute for Measurement, University of Illinois.
Winterstein, B. P., Willse, J. T., Kwapil, T. R., & Silvia, P. J. (2010). Assessment of score dependability of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales using generalizability analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 575–585. CrossRef
Zimowski, M., Muraki, E., Mislevy, R. J., & Bock, R. D. (2003). BILOG-MG 3: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
- Psychometric Properties of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales in an Undergraduate Sample: Classical Test Theory, Item Response Theory, and Differential Item Functioning
Beate P. Winterstein
Terry A. Ackerman
Paul J. Silvia
Thomas R. Kwapil
- Springer US
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505