Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The aim of this study was to test psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), to provide normative values, and to analyze associations between life satisfaction and sociodemographic and behavioral data.
A German community sample (n = 9711) with an age range of 18–80 years was surveyed using the SWLS and several other questionnaires. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test the dimensionality of the SWLS. Invariance across gender and age groups was tested with multiple-group CFA. Associations between SWLS, sociodemographic variables, and behavioral variables were tested with ANOVAs.
Confirmatory factorial analysis results confirmed that the SWLS is a one-dimensional scale. Measurement invariance across gender was completely confirmed, while concerning age strict measurement invariance was confirmed. The effects of gender and age on satisfaction with life were weak. Satisfaction with life was associated with fatigue (r = − .49), the mental component of quality of life (r = .45), anxiety (r = − .42), dispositional optimism (r = .41), pessimism (r = − .34), sleep quality (r = − .32), and sociodemographic factors such as marital status, income, and occupational status. Non-smokers reported higher life satisfaction than smokers.
Because of the good psychometric properties, the SWLS can be recommended for use in epidemiological research. Normative values based on a large community sample are provided.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Diener, E., Sandvik, E., Seidlitz, L., & Diener, M. (1993). The relationship between income and subjective well-being: Relative or absolute? Social Indicators Reseach, 28(3), 195–223. CrossRef
Steptoe, A., Deaton, A., & Stone, A. A. (2015). Subjective wellbeing, health, and ageing. The Lancet, 385(9968), 640–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61489-0. CrossRef
Glaesmer, H., Grande, G., Brähler, E., & Roth, M. (2011). The German version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties, validity, and population-based norms. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 27(2), 127–132. CrossRef
Vázquez, C., Rahona, J. J., Gómez, D., Caballero, F. F., & Hervás, G. (2015). A national representative study of the relative impact of physical and psychological problems on life satisfaction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 135–148. CrossRef
Priller, E., & Schupp, J. (2011). Social and economic characteristics of financial and blood donors in Germany. DIW Economic Bulletin, 6, 23–30.
Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3(1), 1–43.
Wu, C.-H., & Yao, G. (2006). Analysis of factorial invariance across gender in the Taiwan version of the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40(6), 1259–1268. CrossRef
Swami, V., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2009). Psychometric evaluation of the Malay Satisfaction With Life Scale. Social Indicators Research, 92(1), 25–33. CrossRef
Tomás, J. M., Gutiérrez, M., Sancho, P., & Romero, I. (2015). Measurement invariance of the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) by gender and age in Angola. Personality and Individual Differences, 85, 182–186. CrossRef
Slocum-Gori, S. L., Zumbo, B. D., Michalos, A. C., & Diener, E. (2009). A note on the Dimensionality of Quality of Life Scales: An illustration with the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS). Social Indicators Research, 92(3), 489–496. CrossRef
Learmonth, Y. C., Alwick, E. A., McAuley, E., & Motl, R. W. (2015). Quality of life and health-related quality of life over 1 year in older women: Monitoring stability and reliability of measurement. Social Indicators Research, 123(1), 267–279. CrossRef
Diener, E., Inglehart, R., & Tay, L. (2013). Theory and validity of life satisfaction scales. Social Indicators Research, 112(3), 497–527. CrossRef
Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., Dewey, J. E., & Gandek, B. (2001). How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: A manual for users of the SF-8™ health survey. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.
Schafer, J. L. (1999). NORM: Multiple imputation of incomplete multivariate data under a normal model (Version 2.02) [software]. Retrieved 15 June 2017 from http://www.stat.psu.edu/~jls/misoftwa.html.
Little, R. J. A. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202. CrossRef
Beauducel, A., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13(2), 186–203. CrossRef
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. CrossRef
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464–504. CrossRef
Roth, M., Decker, O., Herzberg, P. Y., & Brahler, E. (2008). Dimensionality and norms of the Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale in a German general population sample. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 190–197. CrossRef
West, R. (2017). Tobacco smoking: Health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychology & Health, 32(8), 1018–1036. CrossRef
- Psychometric properties of the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), derived from a large German community sample
Matthias L. Schroeter
Philipp Y. Herzberg
- Springer International Publishing