Top

Optie A:

Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:

Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Their Children’s First Educators: Parents’ View...

volgende artikel Parental Intimate Partner Violence, Parenting P...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-10-2012 | Original Paper | Uitgave 5/2012

Psychometric Properties of the Parental Distress Subscale

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Child and Family Studies > Uitgave 5/2012

Auteurs:: Antoinette Y. Farmer, N. Andrew Peterson

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Abstract

Using data from the Fragile Family Child Wellbeing Study, we examined the psychometric properties of the parental distress subscale of the parenting stress index—short form. Unlike previous studies, we found that the two-factor model did not fit the data significantly better than the one-factor model. Moreover, the results indicated that both the one-factor and the two-factor models provided only a marginal fit to the data. This finding was consistent across two time periods. Implications of these findings and future research are discussed.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijft u als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen uw vak. Met het online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Abidin, R. R. (1995). Parenting stress index (3rd ed.). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Spring House, PA: Amos Development Cooperation.

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455. CrossRef

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230–258. CrossRef

Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillside, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. F. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1, 16–29. CrossRef

Deater-Deckard, K., & Scarr, S. (1996). Parenting stress among dual-earner mothers and fathers: Are there gender differences? Journal of Family Psychology, 1, 45–59. CrossRef

DiStefano, C., & Hess, B. (2005). Using confirmatory factor analysis for construct validation: An empirical review. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 225–241. CrossRef

Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). The effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on SEM fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56–83. CrossRef

Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 186–192. CrossRef

Green, S. B., Lissitz, R. W., & Muliak, S. A. (1977). Limitations of coefficient alpha as an index of test unidimensionality. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37, 827–838. CrossRef

Haskett, M. E., Ahern, L. S., Ward, C. S., & Allaire, J. C. (2006). Factor structure and validity of the parenting stress index-short form. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 302–312. PubMedCrossRef

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). Structural equation modeling: Concepts issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–31. CrossRef

Kline, R. B. (2004). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). New York: Guildford.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.

McKelvey, L. M., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Faldowski, R. A., Shears, J., Ayoub, C., & Hart, A. D. (2009). Validity of the short form of parenting stress index for fathers of toddlers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 18, 102–111. CrossRef

McKnight, P. E., McKnight, K. M., Sidani, S., & Figueredo, A. J. (2007). Missing data: A gentle introduction. New York: Guilford Press.

Muthen, B. B., & Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal likert variables. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171–189. CrossRef

Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability. Psychological Methods, 5, 343–355. PubMedCrossRef

Raftery, A. E. (1993). Bayesian model selection in structural equation models. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 163–180). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Raykov, T. (2001). Approximate confidence interval for difference in fit of structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 458–469. CrossRef

Reichman, N. E., Teitler, J. O., Garfinkel, I., & McLanahan, S. S. (2001). Fragile families: Sample and design. Children and Youth Services Review, 23, 303–326. CrossRef

Schaefer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147–177. CrossRef

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 4, 350–353. CrossRef

van der Heijden, P. G., van Buuren, S., Fekkes, M., Radder, J., & Verrips, E. (2003). Unidimensionality and reliability under Mokken scaling of the Dutch language version of the SF-36. Quality of Life Research, 12, 189–198. PubMedCrossRef

Whiteside-Mansell, L., Ayoub, C., McKelvey, L., Faldowski, R. A., Hart, A., & Shears, J. (2007). Parenting stress of low-income parents of toddlers and preschoolers: Psychometric properties of a short form of the parenting stress index. Parenting Science and Practice, 7, 27–56.

Zaidman-Zait, A., Mirenda, P., Zumbo, B. D., Wellington, S., Dua, V., & Kalynchuk, K. (2010). An item response theory analysis of the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form with parents of children with autism spectrum distorders. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 1269–1277. PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Psychometric Properties of the Parental Distress Subscale
Auteurs:: Antoinette Y. Farmer
N. Andrew Peterson
Publicatiedatum: 01-10-2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-011-9527-3
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Child and Family Studies
Uitgave 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1062-1024
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2843

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 5/2012

Prior Trauma Exposure for Youth in Treatment Foster Care

The Role of Implicit Measurement in the Assessment of Risky Behavior: A Pilot Study with African American Girls

Erratum to: Parent Perspectives of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Children with Autism Served in Community Mental Health Clinics

Kevin T. Kalikow: Your Child in the Balance: Solving the Psychiatric Medicine Dilemma

A Further Examination of the Distinction Between Dependency-Oriented and Achievement-Oriented Parental Psychological Control: Psychometric Properties of the DAPCS with French-Speaking Late Adolescents

Parental Intimate Partner Violence, Parenting Practices, and Adolescent Peer Bullying: A Prospective Study