Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10802-016-0176-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a popular standardised instrument typically used for screening psychopathology in children and adolescents. However, peer reviewed studies evaluating the psychometric properties of the parent-rated preschool SDQ are lacking. The current study involved mothers of 5481 2 year olds (52 % male) from the Growing Up in New Zealand cohort, and investigated the psychometric properties of the preschool SDQ within this cohort. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the SDQ’s factor structure and test for measurement invariance of the factor model. Cronbach’s alpha was used to measure the internal consistency of the subscales and total difficulties scale. We found support for a modified five-factor model, in which the prosocial factor was extended into a positive construal factor by allowing cross-loadings of reverse-scored items. Full measurement invariance was found across gender and socioeconomic status, and partial invariance was found across mother’s ethnicity. Cronbach’s alpha was satisfactory for all subscales (α range = 0.71–0.84), except peer problems (α = 0.54). Normative scores and bandings for normal, borderline and abnormal ranges are described for each subscale. Analyses revealed group differences in scores for child’s gender, mother’s ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Overall, satisfactory psychometric properties were found for the preschool SDQ in 2 year olds, indicating that that the questionnaire can be used in very young children.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Table S1 (DOCX 14 kb)10802_2016_176_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist/4–18 and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Achenbach, T. M., & Edelbrock, C. S. (1983). Manual for the child behavior checklist and revised child behavior profile. Burlington, VT: Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont.
Bardone, A. M., Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Dickson, N., Stanton, W. R., & Silva, P. A. (1998). Adult physical health outcomes of adolescent girls with conduct disorder, depression, and anxiety. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 37, 594–601. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199806000-00009. CrossRef
Becker, A., Woerner, W., Hasselhorn, M., Banaschewski, T., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Validation of the parent and teacher SDQ in a clinical sample. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii11-ii16. doi:10.1007/s00787–004–2003-5.
Bourdon, K. H., Goodman, R., Rae, D. S., Simpson, G., & Koretz, D. S. (2005). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: U.S. normative data and psychometric properties. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 557–564. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000159157.57075.c8. CrossRefPubMed
Caspi, A., Moffitt, T. E., Newman, D. L., & Silva, P. A. (1996). Behavioral observations at age 3 years predict adult psychiatric disorders. Longitudinal evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 53, 1033–1039. PubMed
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233–255. CrossRef
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edn. Hillsdale, New Jersey: L. Erlbaum.
Du, Y., Kou, J., & Coghill, D. (2008). The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in China. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 2, 8. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-2-8. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Einon, D., & Potegal, M. (1994). Temper tantrums in young children (pp. 157–194). The Dynamics of Aggression: Biological and Social Processes in Dyads and Groups.
Goodman, R. (2001). Psychometric properties of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 1337–1345. CrossRef
Hofstra, M. B., van der Ende, J., & Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Child and adolescent problems predict DSM-IV disorders in adulthood: a 14-year follow-up of a Dutch epidemiological sample. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 182–189 http://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200202000-00012. CrossRefPubMed
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Iida, Y., Moriwaki, A., Komatsu, S., & Kamio (2014). Standardization of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire among Japanese 4–5 year-old preschool children. In Y. Kamio (Ed.), In Annual report of research supported by health and labour sciences research grants. Prevalence of developmental disorders and its developmental change: a community-based cross-sectional and prospective study (pp. 33–41). National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry: Tokyo.
Matsuishi, T., Nagano, M., Araki, Y., Tanaka, Y., Iwasaki, M., Yamashita, Y., et al. (2008). Scale properties of the Japanese version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ): a study of infant and school children in community samples. Brain and Development, 30, 410–415. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2007.12.003. CrossRefPubMed
Mellor, D. (2005). Normative data for the strengths and difficulties questionnaire in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 40, 215–222. CrossRef
Morton, S. M. B., Grant, C. C., Carr, P. E. A., Robinson, E. M., Kinloch, J. M., Fleming, C. J., et al. (2014). How do you recruit and retain a prebirth cohort? Lessons learnt from growing up in New Zealand. Evaluation & the Health Professions, 37(4), 411–433. doi: 10.1177/0163278712462717. CrossRef
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.
Nunnally, J. C., Bernstein, I. H., & Berge, J. M. ten. (1967). Psychometric theory (Vol. 226). McGraw-Hill New York. Retrieved from http://rds.epi-ucsf.org/ticr/syllabus/courses/46/2005/10/20/Lecture/readings/Psychometric%20Theory.pdf.
Piedmont, R. L. (2014). Inter-item correlations. In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 3303–3304). Springer Netherlands. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_1493.
Pornprasertmanit, S., Miller, P., Schoemann, A., & Rosseel, Y. (2013). semTools: useful tools for structural equation modeling. R Package Available on CRAN.
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: an R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. CrossRef
Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M., & Parker, J. G. (2007). Peer interactions, relationships, and groups. In Handbook of Child Psychology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0310/abstract.
Salmond, C., Crampton, P., & Atkinson, J. (2007). NZDep2006 index of deprivation. Wellington: University of Otago (Department of Public Health).
Statistics New Zealand (2004). Report of the review of the measurement of ethnicity. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
Statistics New Zealand (2005). Statistical standard for ethnicity. Wellington, New Zealand: Statistics New Zealand.
Steenkamp, J.-B. E., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in cross-national consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25, 78–107. CrossRef
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., & Janssens, J. M. A. M. (2010). Psychometric properties of the parent and teacher versions of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire for 4- to 12-year-olds: a review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 13, 254–274. doi: 10.1007/s10567-010-0071-2. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Stone, L. L., Otten, R., Ringlever, L., Hiemstra, M., Engels, R. C. M. E., Vermulst, A. A., et al. (2013). The parent version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire: omega as an alternative to alpha and a test for measurement invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44–50. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000119. CrossRef
van de Looij-Jansen, P. M., Goedhart, A. W., de Wilde, E. J., & Treffers, P. D. (2011). Confirmatory factor analysis and factorial invariance analysis of the adolescent self-report strengths and difficulties questionnaire: how important are method effects and minor factors? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50, 127–144. CrossRefPubMed
Williams, D. R., & Collins, C. (1995). US socioeconomic and racial differences in health: patterns and explanations. Annual Review of Sociology, 21, 349–386. CrossRef
Woerner, W., Becker, A., & Rothenberger, A. (2004). Normative data and scale properties of the German parent SDQ. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, ii3–ii10. doi:10.1007/s00787–004–2002-6.
Youth in Mind. (2014). SDQ: information for researchers and professionals about the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires. Retrieved from http://www.sdqinfo.com/.
- Psychometric Properties and Normative Data for the Preschool Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in Two-Year-Old Children
Karen E Waldie
Elizabeth R. Peterson
Susan M. B. Morton
- Springer US