Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is widely used in adult populations; however, its usefulness with adolescents has been explored less. This study sought to evaluate the reliability, validity, and factor structure of the Chinese version of HADS in a community sample of adolescents residing in Hong Kong.
A prospective cohort of 5,857 students recruited from 17 secondary schools completed the HADS. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were examined. Confirmatory factor analysis was applied to test the relative fits of six factor structures of the HADS. The best fitting model was further cross-validated by male, female, split-half samples, and age subgroups.
The HADS possessed adequate internal consistency, especially for the anxiety subscale. Significant concurrent intercorrelations with self-reported suicidal thoughts and the Youth Self Report Anxious/Depressed subscale were discovered and found to be stronger for females. The cross-validation supported a two-factor model, where anxiety item 7, “I can sit at ease and feel relaxed”, was placed in the depression subscale.
The HADS showed satisfactory psychometric properties as a screening instrument in assessing anxious and depressive states as two correlated but distinct factors in adolescents. Study implications and recommendations for future research were discussed.
Axelson, D. A., & Birmaher, B. (2001). Relation between anxiety and depressive disorder in childhood and adolescence. Depress and Anxiety, 14(2), 67–78. CrossRef
Berard, R. M. F., & Ahmed, N. (1995). Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a screening instrument in a depressed adolescent and young adult population. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 8, 157–166.
Leung, C. M., Ho, S., Kan, C. S., Hung, C. H., & Chen, C. N. (1993). Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. A cross-cultural perspective. International Journal of Psychosomatics, 40, 29–34. PubMed
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Manual for the YSR and 1991 profile. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont.
Papoulis, A. (1990). Probability and statistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis: Application for development research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180. CrossRef
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dunn, G., Everitt, B., & Pickles, A. (1993). Modeling covariances and latent variables using EQS. London: Chapman & Hall.
Kovacs, M., & Paulauskas, S. (1984). Developmental stage and the expression of depressive disorders in children: An empirical analysis. In D. Cicchetti & K. Schneider-Rosen (Eds.), Childhood depression (Vol. 26 (pp. 59–80). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Freud, S. (1921). Group Psychology and Analysis of the Ego. XVII (2nd ed.), Hogarth Press, 1955.
- Psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in a large community sample of adolescents in Hong Kong
Doris Y. P. Leung
Daniel Y. T. Fong
Antoinette M. Lee
- Springer Netherlands