Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ) was developed as a screener of Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). To date, the majority of the SCQ utility studies focused on its external validity (e.g., ROC curve analyses), but very few have addressed the internal validity issues. With samples consisting of 2,134 individuals available from the National Database for Autism Research (NDAR), the current study examined the factor structure, item-level characteristics, and measurement equivalence of the SCQ forms (i.e., Lifetime form and Current form) using both the classical true score theory and the Item Response Theory (IRT). While our findings indicate sufficient psychometric properties of the SCQ Lifetime form, measurement issues emerged with respect to the SCQ Current form. These issues include lower internal consistencies, a weaker factor structure, lower item discriminations, significant pseudo-guessing effects, and subscale-level measurement bias. Thus, we caution researchers and clinicians about the use of the SCQ Current form. In particular, it seems inappropriate to use the Current form as an alternative to the Lifetime form among children younger than 5 years old or under other special situations (e.g., teacher-report data), although such practices were advised by the publisher of the SCQ. Instead, we recommend modifying the wording of the Lifetime form items rather than switching to the Current form where a 3-month timeframe is specified for responding to SCQ items. Future studies may consider investigating the association between the temporality of certain behaviors and the individual’s potential for being diagnosed with ASD, as well as the age neutrality of the SCQ.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Baker, F. B. (1985). The basics of item response theory. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of Item Response Theory (2nd ed.). College Park, MD: ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation, University of Maryland.
Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor interventions for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5, 397–422. CrossRef
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B Methodological, 57, 289–300.
Bentler, P. M. (2007). On tests and indices for evaluating structural models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 825–829. CrossRef
Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord & M. R. Novick (Eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 392–479). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Blumberg, S. J., Bramlett, M. D., Kogan, M. D., Schieve, L. A., Jones, J. R., & Lu, M. C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011–2012. National health statistics reports; no 65.
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical methods in cancer research: Volume 1 the analysis of case-control studies. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Brooks, W. T., & Benson, B. A. (2013). The validity of the social communication questionnaire in adults with intellectual disability. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7, 247–255. CrossRef
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (2004). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 92–119). New York: Guilford Press.
Cai, L., Thissen, D., & du Toit, S. H. (2011). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
de Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: The Guilford Press.
Eaves, L. C., Wingert, H. D., Ho, H. H., & Mickelson, E. C. (2006). Screening for autism spectrum disorders with the social communication questionnaire. Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 27(2), 94–103.
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2006). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers. CrossRef
Holland, P. W., & Wainer, H. (1993). Differential item functioning. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55. CrossRef
Kim, J., & Oshima, T. C. (2012). Effect of multiple testing adjustment in differential item functioning detection. Educational and Psychological Measurement. doi: 10.1177/0013164412467033. Advance online publication.
Lee, L., David, A. B., Rusyniak, J., Landa, R., & Newschaffer, C. J. (2007). Performance of the social communication questionnaire in children receiving preschool special education services. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1(2), 126–138. CrossRef
Lord, F., & Novick, M. R. (Eds.). (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Magyar, C. I., Pandolfi, V., & Dill, C. A. (2012). An initial evaluation of the social communication questionnaire for the assessment of autism spectrum disorder in children with down syndrome. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 33(2), 134–145. PubMed
Mantel, N. (1963). Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom; Extension of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 690–700.
Mantel, N., & Haenszel, W. (1959). Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 22, 719–748. PubMed
Matson, J. L., & Smith, K. R. (2008). Current status of intensive behavioral interventions for young children with autism and PDD-NOS. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 2(1), 60–74. CrossRef
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
Penfield, R. D. (2012). DIFAS 5.0. Differential item functioning analysis system: User’s manual. Unpublished manuscript.
Penfield, R. D., & Algina, J. (2006). A generalized DIF effect variance estimator for measuring unsigned differential test functioning in mixed format tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(3), 295–312. CrossRef
Rutter, M., Bailey, A., & Lord, C. (2003a). The social communication questionnaire manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Rutter, M., Le Couteur, A., & Lord, C. (2003b). Autism diagnostic interview–revised manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Current methodological considerations in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(4), 304–321. CrossRef
Snow, A. V., & Lecavalier, L. (2008). Sensitivity and specificity of the modified checklist for autism in toddlers and the social communication questionnaire in preschoolers suspected of having pervasive developmental disorders. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 12(6), 627–644. CrossRef
Studts, C. R. (2008). Improving screening for externalizing behavior problems in very young children: applications of item response theory to evaluate instruments in pediatric primary care (Doctoral dissertation). From http://digital.library.louisville.edu/utils/getfile/collection/etd/id/450/filename/451.pdf.
Wells, C. S., Subkoviak, M. J., & Serlin, R. C. (2002). The effect of item parameter drift on examinee ability estimates. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26, 77–87. CrossRef
Wiggins, L. D., Bakeman, R., Adamson, L. B., & Robins, D. L. (2007). The utility of the social communication questionnaire in screening for autism in children referred for early intervention. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(1), 33–38. CrossRef
Wilkinson, L. A. (2010). A best practice guide to assessment and intervention for autism and Asperger syndrome in schools. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Yu, C. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes. (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles). Retrieved from http://statmodel2.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf.
- Psychometric Analysis of the Social Communication Questionnaire Using an Item-Response Theory Framework: Implications for the Use of the Lifetime and Current Forms
Steven Randall Chesnut
- Springer US
Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment
Print ISSN: 0882-2689
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3505