Optie A:
Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
Optie B:
Deel de link per e-mail
Link delen

vorige artikel Re-examining the Epidemiology of Sensory Regula...

volgende artikel Early Adolescents’ Perceptions of Their Mother’...

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-11-2009 | Uitgave 8/2009

Providing Information to Parents of Children with Mental Health Problems: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Analysis of Professional Preferences

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology > Uitgave 8/2009

Auteurs:: Charles E. Cunningham, Ken Deal, Heather Rimas, Yvonne Chen, Don H. Buchanan, Kathie Sdao-Jarvie

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Dr. Cunningham is Professor, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences and the Jack Laidlaw Chair in Patient-Centred Health Care. Dr. Deal is Associate Professor of Strategic Market Leadership and Health Services Management, DeGroote School of Business. Heather Rimas is Research Coordinator of the Patient-Centred Service Research Unit. This project was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Jack Laidlaw Chair in Patient-Centred Health at McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences. We acknowledge the contributions of the agencies and professionals who supported this research and the editorial assistance provided by Stephanie Mielko, Jenna Ratcliffe, Donna Bohaychuk, and Catherine Campbell. Address correspondence to Dr. Charles Cunningham, McMaster Children’s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 3Z5. Electronic mail may be sent via Internet to cunnic@hhsc.ca.

Abstract

We used discrete choice conjoint analysis to model the ways 645 children’s mental health (CMH) professionals preferred to provide information to parents seeking CMH services. Participants completed 20 choice tasks presenting experimentally varied combinations of the study’s 14 4-level CMH information transfer attributes. Latent class analysis revealed three segments. Open Access professionals (32.2%) preferred that intake workers automatically provide all parents with CMH information. They preferred information prepared by professional organizations and located at accessible settings such as public schools. They responded favorably to the internet as a source of information for parents. Controlled Access professionals (22.2%) preferred information that was approved and recommended by a child’s therapist, prepared by an experienced clinician, and located at hospitals and CMH clinics. Process Sensitive professionals (45.6%) showed a stronger preference for active learning materials with parenting groups and therapist “coaching” calls supporting the knowledge transfer process. Simulations suggested that realizing the benefits of CMH information requires the development of knowledge transfer strategies that align the preferences of professionals with those of the families they serve.

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL houdt u eenvoudig en efficiënt uw vak bij. Met een online abonnement heeft u toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, tijdschriften en online nascholing. Denk hierbij aan e-learnings en web-tv's. Zo kunt u op uw gemak en wanneer het u het beste uitkomt verdiepen in uw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Allenby, G. M., Arora, N., & Gintner, J. L. (1995). Incorporating prior knowledge into the analysis of conjoint studies. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 152–162. CrossRef

Allenby, G. M., Fennell, G., Huber, J., Eagle, T., Gilbride, T., Horsky, D., et al. (2005). Adjusting choice models to better predict market behavior. Marketing Letters, 16, 197–208. CrossRef

Amsallem, E., Kasparian, C., Cucherat, M., Chabaud, S., Haugh, M., Boissel, J. P., et al. (2007). Evaluation of two evidence-based knowledge transfer interventions for physicians. A cluster randomized controlled factorial design trial: the CardioDAS study. Fundamental & Clinical Pharmacology, 21, 631–641. CrossRef

Andrews, J. N., Swank, P. R., Foorman, B., & Fletcher, J. M. (1995). Effects of educating parents about ADHD. The ADHD Report, 3, 12–13.

Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: a meta-analytic review. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 471–499. CrossRefPubMed

Arora, N., Allenby, G. M., & Ginter, J. L. (1998). A hierarchical Bayes model of primary and secondary demand. Marketing Science, 17, 29–44. CrossRef

Barbour, R. S. (1999). The case for combining qualitative and quantitative approaches in health services research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 4, 39–43.

Bennett, D. S., Power, T. J., Rostain, A. L., & Carr, D. E. (1996). Parent acceptability and feasibility of ADHD interventions: assessment, correlates, and predictive validity. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 21, 643–657. CrossRefPubMed

Buchanan, A. (1988). Principal/agent theory and decision making in health care. Bioethics, 2, 317–333. CrossRefPubMed

Caruso, E. M., Rahnev, D. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Using conjoint analysis to detect discrimination: revealing covert preferences from overt choices. Social Cognition, 27, 128–137. CrossRef

Coast, J. (1999). The appropriate uses of qualitative methods in health economics. Health Economics, 8, 345–353. CrossRefPubMed

Connell, S., Sanders, M. R., & Markie-Dadds, C. (1997). Self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of oppositional children in rural and remote areas. Behavior Modification, 21, 379–408. CrossRefPubMed

Corkum, P., Rimer, P., & Schachar, R. (1999). Parental knowledge of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and opinions of treatment options: Impact on enrollment and adherence to a 12-month treatment trial. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 44, 1043–1048.

Cunningham, C. E., Boyle, M., Offord, D., Racine, Y., Hundert, J., Secord, M., et al. (2000). Tri-ministry study: correlates of school-based parenting course utilization. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 928–933. CrossRefPubMed

Cunningham, C. E., Buchanan, D., & Deal, K. (2004). Modeling patient-centered children’s health services using choice-based conjoint hierarchical Bayes. 10th Annual Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 249–256). Sequim: Sawtooth Software Inc.

Cunningham, C. E., Deal, K., Rimas, H., Buchanan, D. H., Gold, M., Sdao-Jarvie, K., et al. (2008). Modeling the information preferences of parents of children with mental health problems: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 36, 1128–1138. CrossRef

Cunningham, C. E., Vaillancourt, T., Rimas, H., Deal, K., Cunningham, L., Short, K., et al. (2009). Modeling the bullying prevention program preferences of educators: a discrete choice conjoint experiment. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9324-2.

DeSarbo, W. S., Ramaswamy, V., & Cohen, S. H. (1995). Market segmentation with choice-based conjoint analysis. Marketing Letters, 6, 137–147. CrossRef

Green, P. E., & Srinivasan, V. (1978). Conjoint analysis in consumer research: issues and outlook. Journal of Consumer Research, 5, 103–123. CrossRef

Grol, R., & Grimshaw, J. (2003). From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet, 362, 1225–1230. CrossRefPubMed

Hahlweg, K., Heinrichs, N., Kuschel, A., & Feldmann, M. (2008). Therapist-assisted, self-administered bibliotherapy to enhance parental competence: short-and long-term effects. Behavior Modification, 32, 659–681. CrossRefPubMed

Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hoagwood, K. (2003). The policy context for child and adolescent mental health services: implications for systems reform and basic science development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1008, 140–148. CrossRefPubMed

Huber, J. (1975). Predicting preferences on experimental bundles of attributes: a comparison of models. Journal of Marketing Research, 12, 290–297. CrossRef

Huber, J., Orme, B., & Miller, R. (2007). Dealing with product similarity in conjoint simulations. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement: Methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 347–362). New York: Springer.

Jacobson, N., Butterill, D., & Goering, P. (2003). Development of a framework for knowledge translation: understanding user context. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 8, 94–99. CrossRef

Johnston, C., Seipp, C., Hommersen, P., Hoza, B., & Fine, S. (2005). Treatment choices and experiences in attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder: relations to parents’ beliefs and attributions. Child: Care, Health and Development, 31, 669–677. CrossRef

Jorm, A. F., Morgan, A. J., & Wright, A. (2008). Interventions that are helpful for depression and anxiety in young people: a comparison of clinicians’ beliefs with those of youth and their parents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 111, 227–234. CrossRefPubMed

Kazdin, A. E., Holland, L., & Crowley, M. (1997). Family experience of barriers to treatment and premature termination from child therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 453–463. CrossRefPubMed

Lavis, J. N., Robertson, D., Woodside, J. M., McLeod, C. B., Abelson, J., & Knowledge Transfer Study Group. (2003). How can research organizations more effectively transfer research knowledge to decision makers? The Milbank Quarterly, 81, 221–248. CrossRefPubMed

Lazaratou, H., Anagnostopoulos, D. C., Alevizos, E. V., Haviara, F., & Ploumpidis, D. N. (2007). Parental attitudes and opinions on the use of psychotropic medication in mental disorders of childhood. Annals of General Psychiatry, 6, 32. CrossRefPubMed

Lenk, P. J., DeSarbo, W. S., Green, P. E., & Young, M. R. (1996). Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: recovery of partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science, 15, 173–192. CrossRef

Leslie, L. K., Weckerly, J., Plemmons, D., Landsverk, J., & Eastman, S. (2004). Implementing the American Academy of Pediatrics attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder diagnostic guidelines in primary care settings. Pediatrics, 114, 129–140. CrossRefPubMed

Lomas, J. (2007). The in-between world of knowledge brokering. British Medical Journal, 334, 129–132. CrossRefPubMed

Longo, M. F., Cohen, D. R., Hood, K., Edwards, A., Robling, M., Elwyn, G., et al. (2006). Involving patients in primary care consultations: assessing preferences using discrete choice experiments. The British Journal of General Practice, 56, 35–42. PubMed

Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2000). Stated choice methods—analysis and application. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Louviere, J. J., Hensher, D. A., & Swait, J. D. (2007). Conjoint preference elicitation methods in the broader context of random utility theory preference elicitation methods. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmann & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement—methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 167–197). New York: Springer.

Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: a new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1–27. CrossRef

Lyneham, H. J., & Rapee, R. M. (2006). Evaluation of therapist-supported parent-implemented CBT for anxiety disorders in rural children. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1287–1300. CrossRefPubMed

Montgomery, P., Bjornstad, G., & Dennis, J. (2006). Media-based behavioural treatments for behavioural problems in children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD002206. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002206.pub3.

Orme, B. K. (2006). Getting started with conjoint analysis: Strategies for product design and pricing research. Madison: Research.

Orme, B. K. (2007). SSI web v6.4 software for web interviewing and conjoint analysis. Sequim: Sawtooth Software, Inc.

Orme, B. K., & Baker, G. C. (2000). Comparing hierarchical Bayes draws and randomized first choice simulations. Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series. Retrieved from www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/rfcdrw.pdf.

Orme, B. K., & Huber, J. (2000). Improving the value of conjoint simulations. Marketing Research, 12, 12–20.

Patterson, M., & Chrzan, K. (2004). Partial profile discrete choice: What’s the optimal number of attributes? 2003 Sawtooth Software Conference Proceedings (pp. 173–185). Sequim: Sawtooth Software.

Perkins, M. B., Jensen, P. S., Jaccard, J., Gollwitzer, P., Oettingen, G., Pappadopulos, E., et al. (2007). Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians’ behavior: what do we know? Psychiatric Services, 58, 342–348. CrossRefPubMed

Pescosolido, B. A., Jensen, P. S., Martin, J. K., Perry, B. L., Olafsdottir, S., & Fettes, D. (2008). Public knowledge and assessment of child mental health problems: findings from the national stigma study-children. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 47, 339–349. CrossRefPubMed

Phillips, K. A., Johnson, F. R., & Maddala, T. (2002). Measuring what people value: a comparison of “attitude” and “preference” surveys. Health Services Research, 37, 1659–1679. CrossRefPubMed

Preference Collaborative Review Group. (2008). Patients’ preferences within randomized trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 337, a1864. CrossRef

President’s New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. (2003). Achieving the promise: Transforming mental health care in America (Final Report No. SMA 03-3832). Retrieved from http://www.mentalhealthcommission.gov/reports/reports.htm.

Ramaswamy, V., & Cohen, S. H. (2007). Latent class models for conjoint analysis. In A. Gustafsson, A. Herrmanm & F. Huber (Eds.), Conjoint measurement methods and applications (4th ed., pp. 295–320). Heidelberg: Springer.

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free.

Ryan, M., Gerard, K., & Amaya-Amaya, M. (2007). Using discrete choice experiments to value health and health care. Netherlands: Springer.

Sawtooth Software Inc. (2004a). The CBC latent class technical paper (version 3) . Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, 1–20. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware.com/download/techpap/lctech.pdf.

Sawtooth Software Inc. (2004b). The CBC/HB system for hierarchical Bayes estimation version 4.0 technical paper . Sawtooth Software Technical Paper Series, 1–31. Retrieved from http://www.sawtoothsoftware/download/techpap/hbtech.pdf.

Shah, A. K., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 207. CrossRefPubMed

Sonuga-Barke, E. J. S., & Balding, J. (1993). British parents’ beliefs about the causes of three forms of childhood psychological disturbance. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 21, 367–376. CrossRefPubMed

Spoth, R., & Redmond, C. (1993). Identifying program preferences through conjoint analysis: illustrative results from a parent sample. American Journal of Health Promotion, 8, 124–133. PubMed

Statistics Canada. (2006). Community profiles from the 2006 census. Retrieved February 3, 2009, from www12.statcan.ca/census-recensement/2006/dp-pd/prof/92-591/Details/Page.cfm.

Swift, J. K., & Callahan, J. L. (2009). The impact of client treatment preferences on outcome: a meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 368–381. CrossRefPubMed

Tolan, P. H., & Dodge, K. A. (2005). Children’s mental health as a primary care and concern: a system for comprehensive support and service: children’s mental health. The American Psychologist, 60, 601–614. CrossRefPubMed

Vick, S., & Scott, A. (1998). Agency in health care. Examining patients’ preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship. Journal of Health Economics, 17, 587–605. CrossRefPubMed

Vriens, M., Wedel, M., & Wilms, T. (1996). Metric conjoint segmentation methods: a Monte Carlo comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 33, 73–85. CrossRef

Wills, C. E., & Holmes-Rovner, M. (2006). Integrating decision making and mental health interventions research: research directions. Clinical Psychology, 13, 9–25. PubMed

Titel: Providing Information to Parents of Children with Mental Health Problems: A Discrete Choice Conjoint Analysis of Professional Preferences
Auteurs:: Charles E. Cunningham
Ken Deal
Heather Rimas
Yvonne Chen
Don H. Buchanan
Kathie Sdao-Jarvie
Publicatiedatum: 01-11-2009
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9338-9
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology An official publication of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology
Uitgave 8/2009
Print ISSN: 0091-0627
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2835

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2009

Interactions Between Maternal Parenting and Children’s Early Disruptive Behavior: Bidirectional Associations across the Transition from Preschool to School Entry

The Pictorial Fire Stroop: A Measure of Processing Bias for Fire-Related Stimuli

Intergenerational Transmission of Multiple Problem Behaviors: Prospective Relationships between Mothers and Daughters

Re-examining the Epidemiology of Sensory Regulation Dysfunction and Comorbid Psychopathology

Children’s Externalizing and Internalizing Symptoms over Time: The Role of Individual Differences in Patterns of RSA Responding

Inhibition, Reinforcement Sensitivity and Temporal Information Processing in ADHD and ADHD+ODD: Evidence of a Separate Entity?