Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 7/2012

01-09-2012

PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales: an item response theory analysis of the parent proxy report item banks

Auteurs: James W. Varni, David Thissen, Brian D. Stucky, Yang Liu, Hally Gorder, Debra E. Irwin, Esi Morgan DeWitt, Jin-Shei Lai, Dagmar Amtmann, Darren A. DeWalt

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 7/2012

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Objective

The objective of the present study is to describe the item response theory (IRT) analysis of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric parent proxy-report item banks and the measurement properties of the new PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales for ages 8–17 years.

Methods

Parent proxy-report items were written to parallel the pediatric self-report items. Test forms containing the items were completed by 1,548 parent–child pairs. CCFA and IRT analyses of scale dimensionality and item local dependence, and IRT analyses of differential item functioning were conducted.

Results

Parent proxy-report item banks were developed and IRT parameters are provided. The recommended unidimensional short forms for the PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales are item sets that are subsets of the pediatric self-report short forms, setting aside items for which parent responses exhibit local dependence. Parent proxy-report demonstrated moderate to low agreement with pediatric self-report.

Conclusions

The study provides initial calibrations of the PROMIS® parent proxy-report item banks and the creation of the PROMIS® Parent Proxy-Report Scales. It is anticipated that these new scales will have application for pediatric populations in which pediatric self-report is not feasible.
vorige artikel Reliability and validity of PDQ-39: a quality-of-life measure for patients with PD in China
volgende artikel The internal responsiveness of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 to detect differences in clinical parameters related to surgical third molar removal
Bijlagen
Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers
Literatuur
1.
Ader, D. N. (2007). Developing the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S1–S2.CrossRef
2.
Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., et al. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the patient-report outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S22–S31.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Cella, D., Yount, S., Rothrock, N., Gershon, R., Cook, K., Reeve, B., et al. (2007). The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Medical Care, 45(Suppl 1), S3–S11.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K., et al. (2010). Sampling plan and patient characteristics of the PROMIS pediatrics large-scale survey. Quality of Life Research, 19, 585–594.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Irwin, D. E., Stucky, B. D., Langer, M. M., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). An item response analysis of the pediatric PROMIS anxiety and depressive symptoms scales. Quality of Life Research, 19, 595–607.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Varni, J. W., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Irwin, D. E., Lai, J. S., et al. (2010). PROMIS pediatric pain interference scale: An item response theory analysis of the pediatric pain item bank. Journal of Pain, 11, 1109–1119.PubMedCrossRef
7.
DeWitt, E. M., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Langer, M., Varni, J. W., Lai, J. S., Yeatts, K. B., & DeWalt, D. A. (2011). Construction of the eight-item patient-reported outcomes measurement information system pediatric physical function scales: built using item response theory. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(7), 794–804.
8.
Yeatts, K., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., Irwin, D. E., Varni, J. W., DeWitt, E. M., et al. (2010). Construction of the pediatric asthma impact scale (PAIS) for the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). Journal of Asthma, 47, 295–302.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Sprangers, M. A. G., & Aaronson, N. K. (1992). The role of health care providers and significant others in evaluating the quality of life of patients with chronic disease: A review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 45, 743–760.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Achenbach, T. M., McConaughy, S. H., & Howell, C. T. (1987). Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 213–232.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Varni, J. W., Katz, E. R., Seid, M., Quiggins, D. J. L., Friedman-Bender, A., & Castro, C. M. (1998). The pediatric cancer quality of life inventory (PCQL): I Instrument development, descriptive statistics, and cross-informant variance. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 179–204.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Upton, P., Lawford, J., & Eiser, C. (2008). Parent-child agreement across child health-related quality of life instruments: A review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 17, 895–913.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Varni, J. W., Limbers, C. A., & Burwinkle, T. M. (2007). Parent proxy-report of their children’s health-related quality of life: An analysis of 13, 878 parents’ reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL™ 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(2), 1–10.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Campo, J. V., Comer, D. M., Jansen-McWilliams, L., Gardner, W., & Kelleher, K. J. (2002). Recurrent pain, emotional distress, and health service use in childhood. Journal of Pediatrics, 141, 76–83.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Janicke, D. M., Finney, J. W., & Riley, A. W. (2001). Children’s health care use: A prospective investigation of factors related to care-seeking. Medical Care, 39, 990–1001.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Varni, J. W., & Setoguchi, Y. (1992). Screening for behavioral and emotional problems in children and adolescents with congenital or acquired limb deficiencies. American Journal of Diseases of Children, 146, 103–107.PubMed
17.
Varni, J. W., Burwinkle, T. M., & Lane, M. M. (2005). Health-related quality of life measurement in pediatric clinical practice: An appraisal and precept for future research and application. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(34), 1–9.
18.
Reise, S. P., & Waller, N. G. (2009). Item response theory and clinical measurement. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 5, 27–48.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Irwin, D. E., Gross, H. E., Stucky, B. D., Thissen, D., DeWitt, E. M., Lai, J. S., Amtmann, D., Khastou, L., Varni, J. W., & DeWalt, D. A. (2011). Development of the PROMIS® pediatrics proxy-report item banks. Manuscript under review.
21.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide [Computer Software] (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
22.
Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92, 544–559.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Cai, L., du Toit, S. H. C., & Thissen, D. (in press). IRTPRO: Flexible, multidimensional, multiple categorical IRT modeling [Computer software]. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
24.
Chen, W. H., & Thissen, D. (1997). Local dependence indexes for item pairs using item response theory. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 22, 265–289.
25.
Lord, F. M. (1977). A study of item bias using item characteristic curve theory. In Y. H. Portinga (Ed.), Basic problems in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 19–29). Amsterdam: Swets and Zeitlinge.
26.
Cai, L. (2008). SEM of another flavour: Two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61, 309–329.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57, 289–300.
28.
Steinberg, L., & Thissen, D. (2006). Using effect sizes for research reporting: Examples using item response theory to analyze differential item functioning. Psychological Methods, 11, 402–415.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Orlando, M., & Thissen, D. (2003). Further investigation of the performance of S-X2: An item fit index for use with dichotomous item response theory models. Applied Psychological Measurement, 27, 289–298.CrossRef
30.
Thissen, D., Nelson, L., Rosa, K., & McLeod, L. D. (2001). Item response theory for items scored in more than two categories. In D. Thissen & H. Wainer (Eds.), Test scoring (pp. 141–186). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
Eiser, C., & Morse, R. (2001). Can parents rate their child’s health-related quality of life? Results from a systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 10, 347–357.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
PROMIS® Parent Proxy Report Scales: an item response theory analysis of the parent proxy report item banks
Auteurs
James W. Varni
David Thissen
Brian D. Stucky
Yang Liu
Hally Gorder
Debra E. Irwin
Esi Morgan DeWitt
Jin-Shei Lai
Dagmar Amtmann
Darren A. DeWalt
Publicatiedatum
01-09-2012
Uitgeverij
Springer Netherlands
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-0025-2

Andere artikelen Uitgave 7/2012

Quality of Life Research 7/2012 Naar de uitgave

OriginalPaper

Longitudinal changes in social functioning in mildly disabled patients with relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis receiving subcutaneous interferon β-1a: results from the COGIMUS (COGnitive Impairment in MUltiple Sclerosis) study (II)

Erratum

Erratum to: Psychometric evaluation of the Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised in a national, US sample

OriginalPaper

The anemia impact measure (AIM): development and content validation of a patient-reported outcome measure of anemia symptoms and symptom impacts in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy

OriginalPaper

The internal responsiveness of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 to detect differences in clinical parameters related to surgical third molar removal

OriginalPaper

The prevalence of hearing impairment and its burden on the quality of life among adults with Medicare Supplement Insurance

OriginalPaper

Impact of diabetes mellitus on quality of life in patients with congestive heart failure