Skip to main content
Mijn bibliotheek
Shop
Nieuws Boeken Tijdschriften E-learning Web-tv Video Audio
Tips voor Mijn BSL
UITGEBREID ZOEKEN
Inloggen
Top
Quality of Life Research
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research 9/2021

24-04-2021

PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health

Auteurs: Jennifer S. Riggs, Marisa Roczen, Alan Levitt, Tara McMullen, Joan Proctor, Eugene Nuccio

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 9/2021

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail
    Link delen
publish
Publiceer nu

Abstract

Purpose

This feasibility study assessed if the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) 10-item Global Health Survey (PROMIS-10) could be a reliable and valid patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for a population of cognitively intact home health (HH) patients.

Methods

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) along with their measurement contractor, Abt Associates, held a field test (2016–2017) to test the feasibility of the PROMIS-10 in in the Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). Home Health clinician data collectors (registered nurses and physical therapists) were trained to complete the PROMIS-10 along with procedures to facilitate patient self-administration of PROMIS-10. These clinicians provided feedback about their experiences at a focus group at the end of data collection.

Results

213 HH patients comprised the field test sample, 150 of whom completed PROMIS-10 surveys. Clinicians reported they found the PROMIS-10 relevant and acceptable for their HH patients, and noted the surveys provided insight into patients’ views of their health. The PROMIS-10 measured the full range of patient-reported health and was sensitive to change between admission and discharge.

Conclusions

The study confirmed that the PROMIS-10 can be implemented in the HH setting, opening the door for consideration for implementing the PROMIS-10 in post-acute care (PAC) settings. This study is a first step toward establishing an assessment that captures the patient’s voice and could be reported by the CMS PAC quality reporting programs.
vorige artikel Exercise tolerance and quality of life in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease
volgende artikel Impact of Moringa Oleifera leaves supplementation on quality of life of people living with HIV: A double-blind randomized controlled trial
Voetnoten
1
The PROMIS Global Scoring Manual [19] provides details on how to calculate t-scores. Higher t-scores mean better physical and mental health status, respectively.
 
Literatuur
1.
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. The National Academies Press.
2.
Tzelepis, F., Rose, S. K., Sanson-Fisher, R. W., Clinton-McHarg, T., Carey, M. L., & Paul, C. L. (2014). Are we missing the Institute of Medicine’s mark? A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures assessing quality of patient-centred cancer care. BMC Cancer, 14, 41CrossRef
3.
4.
Basch, E. (2014). New frontiers in patient-reported outcomes: Adverse event reporting, comparative effectiveness, and quality assessment. Annual Review of Medicine, 65(1), 307–317CrossRef
5.
Snyder, C. F., Aaronson, N. K., Choucair, A. K., Elliott, T. E., Greenhalgh, J., Halyard, M. Y., Hess, R., Miller, D. M., Reeve, B. B., & Santana, M. (2012). Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: A review of the options and considerations. Quality of Life Research, 21(8), 1305–1314CrossRef
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
van Tuyl, L. H. D., & Boers, M. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases. Nature Reviews Rheumatology, 11, 705–712CrossRef
11.
Dawson, J., Doll, H., Fitzpatrick, R., Jenkinson, C., & Carr, A. J. (2010). The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ, 340, c186CrossRef
12.
Deshpande, P. R., Rajan, S., Sudeepthi, B. L., & Abdul Nazir, C. P. (2011). Patient-reported outcomes: A new era in clinical research. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2(4), 137–144CrossRef
13.
Revicki, D., Hays, R. D., Cella, D., & Sloan, J. (2008). Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(2), 102–109CrossRef
14.
Nelson, E. C., Eftimovska, E., Lind, C., Hager, A., Wasson, J. H., & Lindblad, S. (2015). Patient reported outcome measures in practice. BMJ, 350, g7818CrossRef
15.
Boyce, M. B., & Browne, J. P. (2013). Does providing feedback on patient-reported outcomes to healthcare professionals result in better outcomes for patients? A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 22(9), 2265–2278CrossRef
16.
Greenhalgh, J., & Meadows, K. (1999). The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 5(4), 401–416CrossRef
17.
Frosch, D. L. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes as a measure of healthcare quality. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 30(10), 1383–1384CrossRef
18.
Edelen, M. O., Rodriguez, A., Ahluwalia, S. C., Chen, E. K., Cohen, C. C., Dalton, S., Etchegaray, J. M., Huang, W., Karkos, B., Klein, D. J., Madrigano, J., Martineau, M., Moore, T., Orr, P., Phillips, J., Schalet, B., Shier, V., Paddock, S. M., & Agniel, D. (2019). Development and evaluation of candidate standardized patient assessment data elements: Findings from the National Beta Test. RAND Corporation.
19.
20.
21.
Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., & Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457CrossRef
22.
Orsmond, G. I., & Cohn, E. S. (2015). The distinctive features of a feasibility study: Objectives and guiding questions. OTJR: Occupation, Participation and Health, 35(3), 169–177PubMed
23.
Rodrigues, I. B., Adachi, J. D., Beattie, K. A., Lau, A., & MacDermid, J. C. (2019). Determining known-group validity and test-retest reliability in the PEQ (personalized exercise questionnaire). BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20(1), 373CrossRef
24.
25.
Cella, D., Lai, J.-S., Jensen, S. E., Christodoulou, C., Junghaenel, D. U., Reeve, B. B., & Stone, A. A. (2016). PROMIS Fatigue Item Bank had clinical validity across diverse chronic conditions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 73, 128–134CrossRef
26.
Fries, J., Rose, M., & Krishnan, E. (2011). The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: Responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and internet administration. The Journal of Rheumatology, 38(8), 1759–1764CrossRef
27.
28.
Ahasic, A. M., Van Ness, P. H., Murphy, T. E., Araujo, K. L. B., & Pisani, M. A. (2015). Functional status after critical illness: Agreement between patient and proxy assessments. Age and Ageing, 44(3), 506–510CrossRef
29.
Elliott, M. N., Beckett, M. K., Chong, K., Hambarsoomians, K., & Hays, R. D. (2008). How do proxy responses and proxy-assisted responses differ from what Medicare beneficiaries might have reported about their health care? Health Services Research, 43(3), 833–848CrossRef
30.
Cella, D., Hahn, E. A., Jensen, S. E., Butt, Z., Nowinski, C. J., Rothrock, N., & Lohr, K. N. (2015). Patient-reported outcomes in performance measurement. RTI Press.CrossRef
31.
Knäuper, B., Carrière, K., Chamandy, M., Xu, Z., Schwarz, N., & Rosen, N. O. (2016). How aging affects self-reports. European Journal of Ageing, 13(2), 185–193CrossRef
32.
Basch, E. M., Barbera, L., Kerrigan, C. L., & Velikova, G. (2018). Implementation of patient-reported outcomes in routine medical care. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, 38, 122–134CrossRef
33.
Chu, A. H., Ng, S. H., Koh, D., & Müller-Riemenschneider, F. (2015). Reliability and validity of the self- and interviewer-administered versions of the Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ). PLoS One, 10(9), e0136944–e0136944CrossRef
34.
Jensen, R. E., Rothrock, N. E., DeWitt, E. M., Spiegel, B., Tucker, C. A., Crane, H. M., Forrest, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Fredericksen, R., Shulman, L. M., Cella, D., & Crane, P. K. (2015). The role of technical advances in the adoption and integration of patient-reported outcomes in clinical care. Medical Care, 53(2), 153–159CrossRef
35.
Shortell, S. M., Poon, B. Y., Ramsay, P. P., Rodriguez, H. P., Ivey, S. L., Huber, T., Rich, J., & Summerfelt, T. (2017). A multilevel analysis of patient engagement and patient-reported outcomes in primary care practices of Accountable Care Organizations. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 32(6), 640–647CrossRef
36.
Bhugra, D., Kar, A., & Lawton-Smith, S. (2014). Integration of mental and physical health services: Lessons. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, 1(1), 15–21CrossRef
37.
Liebel, D. V., & Powers, B. A. (2013). Home health care nurse perceptions of geriatric depression and disability care management. The Gerontologist, 55(3), 448–461CrossRef
38.
Brown, E., Kaiser, R. M., & Gellis, Z. (2007). Screening and assessment of late-life depression in home healthcare: Issues and challenges. Annals of Long Term Care, 15(10), 27
39.
Theeke, L. A., & Mallow, J. (2013). Loneliness and quality of life in chronically Ill rural older adults: Findings from a pilot study. The American Journal of Nursing, 113(9), 28CrossRef
40.
Nicholson, N. R. (2012). A review of social isolation: An important but underassessed condition in older adults. The Journal of Primary Prevention, 33(2), 137–152CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
PROMIS Global Health: Feasibility in home health
Auteurs
Jennifer S. Riggs
Marisa Roczen
Alan Levitt
Tara McMullen
Joan Proctor
Eugene Nuccio
Publicatiedatum
24-04-2021
Uitgeverij
Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in
Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 9/2021
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02845-x

Andere artikelen Uitgave 9/2021

Quality of Life Research 9/2021 Naar de uitgave

Correction

Correction to: Social inequalities in health‑related quality of life among people aging with HIV/AIDS: the role of comorbidities and disease severity

OriginalPaper

Psychometric assessment of EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety and depression: construct validity and responsiveness

OriginalPaper

Association between knee symptoms, change in knee symptoms over 6–9 years, and SF-6D health state utility among middle-aged Australians

OriginalPaper

A psychometric evaluation of the Functional assessment of cancer therapy—kidney symptom index (FKSI-19) among renal cell carcinoma patients suggesting an alternative two-factor structure

OriginalPaper

The association between nonrestorative sleep and health-related quality of life in Chinese adults: a cross-sectional study

OriginalPaper

Impact of Moringa Oleifera leaves supplementation on quality of life of people living with HIV: A double-blind randomized controlled trial