Physician Beliefs about the Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record: A Follow-Up Study

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background There is continuing interest in how physicians are responding to the meaningful use of the electronic health record (EHR) incentive program. However, little research has been done on physician beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR.

Objective This study aims to conduct a follow-up study of physician beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR.

Methods Online survey of physicians at two academic medical centers (AMCs) in the northeast who were participating in the meaningful use of the EHR incentive program and were using an internally developed EHR was conducted.

Results Of the 2,033 physicians surveyed, 1,075 completed the survey for an overall response rate of 52.9%. Only one-fifth (20.5%) of the physicians agreed or strongly agreed that meaningful use of the EHR would help them improve quality of care, and only a quarter (25.2%) agreed or strongly agreed that the meaningful use of the EHR would improve the care that their organization delivers. Physician satisfaction with the outpatient EHR was the strongest predictor of self-efficacy with achieving stage 2 of the meaningful use of the EHR incentive program (odds ratio: 2.10, 95% confidence interval: 1.61, 2.75, p < 0.001). Physicians reported more negative beliefs in stage 2 than stage 1 across all belief items. For example, 28.1% agreed or strongly agreed that the meaningful use of the EHR would decrease medical errors in stage 2 as compared with 35.9% in stage 1 (p < 0.001).

Conclusion Only one-fifth of the physicians in our study believed that the meaningful use of the EHR would improve quality of care, patient-centeredness of care, or the care they personally provide. Primary care physicians expressed more negative beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR in stage 2 than in stage 1. These findings show that physicians continue to express negative beliefs about the meaningful use of the EHR. These ongoing negative beliefs are concerning for both implementation and policy.

• References

• 1 Blumenthal D, Tavenner M. The “meaningful use” regulation for electronic health records. N Engl J Med 2010; 363 (06) 501-504
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Buntin MB, Jain SH, Blumenthal D. Health information technology: laying the infrastructure for national health reform. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (06) 1214-1219
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Linder JA, Ma J, Bates DW, Middleton B, Stafford RS. Electronic health record use and the quality of ambulatory care in the United States. Arch Intern Med 2007; 167 (13) 1400-1405
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Samal L, Wright A, Healey MJ, Linder JA, Bates DW. Meaningful use and quality of care. JAMA Intern Med 2014; 174 (06) 997-998
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Grabenbauer L, Fraser R, McClay J. , et al. Adoption of electronic health records: a qualitative study of academic and private physicians and health administrators. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2 (02) 165-176
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Grabenbauer L, Skinner A, Windle J. Electronic health record adoption–maybe it's not about the money: physician super-users, electronic health records and patient care. Appl Clin Inform 2011; 2 (04) 460-471
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Weeks DL, Keeney BJ, Evans PC, Moore QD, Conrad DA. Provider perceptions of the electronic health record incentive programs: a survey of eligible professionals who have and have not attested to meaningful use. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (01) 123-130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Emani S, Ting DY, Healey M. , et al. Physician beliefs about the impact of meaningful use of the EHR: a cross-sectional study. Appl Clin Inform 2014; 5 (03) 789-801
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Emani S, Ting DY, Healey M. , et al. Physician perceptions and beliefs about generating and providing a clinical summary of the office visit. Appl Clin Inform 2015; 6 (03) 577-590
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Jha AK. Meaningful use of electronic health records: the road ahead. JAMA 2010; 304 (15) 1709-1710
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Abbett SK, Bates DW, Kachalia A. The meaningful use regulations in information technology: what do they mean for quality improvement in hospitals?. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2011; 37 (07) 333-336 , 289
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Hogan SO, Kissam SM. Measuring meaningful use. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (04) 601-606
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Hsiao CJ, Decker SL, Hing E, Sisk JE. Most physicians were eligible for federal incentives in 2011, but few had EHR systems that met meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (05) 1100-1107
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Decker SL, Jamoom EW, Sisk JE. Physicians in nonprimary care and small practices and those age 55 and older lag in adopting electronic health record systems. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012; 31 (05) 1108-1114
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Xierali IM, Phillips Jr RL, Green LA, Bazemore AW, Puffer JC. Factors influencing family physician adoption of electronic health records (EHRs). J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26 (04) 388-393
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Heisey-Grove D, King JA. Physician and practice-level drivers and disparities around meaningful use progress. Health Serv Res 2017; 52 (01) 244-267
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Special Topics. In: Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2000
  Google Scholar
• 18 Mitchell J, Waldren SE. Making sense of meaningful use stage 2: second wave or tsunami?. Fam Pract Manag 2014; 21 (01) 19-24
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Ralston JD, Coleman K, Reid RJ, Handley MR, Larson EB. Patient experience should be part of meaningful-use criteria. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010; 29 (04) 607-613
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 DesRoches CM, Audet A-M, Painter M, Donelan K. Meeting meaningful use criteria and managing patient populations: a national survey of practicing physicians. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158 (11) 791-799
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Makam AN, Lanham HJ, Batchelor K. , et al. Use and satisfaction with key functions of a common commercial electronic health record: a survey of primary care providers. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2013; 13: 86
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84 (02) 191-215
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Zandieh SO, Abramson EL, Pfoh ER, Yoon-Flannery K, Edwards A, Kaushal R. Transitioning between ambulatory EHRs: a study of practitioners' perspectives. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2012; 19 (03) 401-406
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Chiang MF, Boland MV, Brewer A. , et al; American Academy of Ophthalmology Medical Information Technology Committee. Special requirements for electronic health record systems in ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2011; 118 (08) 1681-1687
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Cabana MD, Kim C. Physician adherence to preventive cardiology guidelines for women. Womens Health Issues 2003; 13 (04) 142-149
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Fernald DH, Wearner R, Dickinson WP. The journey of primary care practices to meaningful use: a Colorado Beacon Consortium study. J Am Board Fam Med 2013; 26 (05) 603-611
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Shea CM, Reiter KL, Weaver MA. , et al. Stage 1 of the meaningful use incentive program for electronic health records: a study of readiness for change in ambulatory practice settings in one integrated delivery system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2014; 14: 119
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar