Silicone Foley’s catheter as an effective alternative to Hunter’s rod in staged flexor tendon reconstruction of the hand

 

 Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Context: Staged flexor tendon reconstruction is most suitable treatment method for extensive zone II tendon injuries. The Hunter’s rod used in this procedure is costly and not easily available, which adds to the miseries of both patients as well as treating surgeon. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of staged zone II flexor tendon repair using silicone Foley’s catheter as a cheaper and readily available alternative to Hunter’s rod. Settings and Design: This was a prospective study. Materials and Methods: Seventy digits in 35 patients were treated by the staged flexor tendon reconstruction using silicone Foley’s catheter in place of Hunter’s rod, and the patients were followed for an average period of 18 months. Early controlled motion exercise protocol was instituted in all cases. Results: As per the Strickland scale, total active motion obtained was excellent in 70%, good in 20%, fair in 7.1% and poor in 2.9% of patients. Conclusions: Silicone Foley’s catheter is cheaper, easily available and an effective alternative to Hunter’s rod in staged flexor tendon reconstruction procedure, yielding high rates of excellent and good results with fewer complications.

• REFERENCES

• 1 David G, Robert S. Flexor tendon injuries and reconstruction. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz VR. editors Text Book of Plastic Surgery. 2nd ed. philadelphia: Saunder Elsevier; 2006: p. 352
  Google Scholar
• 2 Hunter JM, Salisbury RE. Flexor-tendon reconstruction in severely damaged hands. A two-stage procedure using a silicone-dacron reinforced gliding prosthesis prior to tendon grafting. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53: 829-58
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Wehbé MA, Mawr B, Hunter JM, Schneider LH, Goodwyn BL. Two-stage flexor-tendon reconstruction. Ten-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986; 68: 752-63
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Kuran I, Ozcan H, Turan T, Sakyz D, Bas L. Searching for alternatives to silicone rods in staged tendon reconstruction. Eur J Plast Surg 1998; 21: 317-20
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 5 Atik B, Sarici M, Kalender AM, Isik D, Aydin OE. Hunter’s technique without Hunter’s rod. Acta Orthop Belg 2012; 78: 479-83
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Bruner JM. The zig-zag volar-digital incision for flexor-tendon surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1967; 40: 571-4
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Mayer L, Ransohoff N. Reconstruction of the digital tendon sheath: A contribution to the physiological method of repair of damaged finger tendons. J Bone Joint Surg 1936; 18: 607-16
  Google Scholar
• 8 Bassett CA, Carroll RE. Formation of tendon sheaths by silicone rod implants. Proceedings of American Society for Surgery of the Hand. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1963; 45: 884
  Google Scholar
• 9 American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH). Clinical Assessment Committee Report. Rosemont, IL: Churchill Livingstone; 1976
  Google Scholar
• 10 Unglaub F, Bultmann C, Reiter A, Hahn P. Two-staged reconstruction of the flexor pollicis longus tendon. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 432-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Smith P, Jones M, Grobbelaar A. Two-stage grafting of flexor tendons: Results after mobilisation by controlled early active movement. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 2004; 38: 220-7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Beris AE, Darlis NA, Korompilias AV, Vekris MD, Mitsionis GI, Soucacos PN. Two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction in zone II using a silicone rod and a pedicled intrasynovial graft. J Hand Surg Am 2003; 28: 652-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Strickland JW. Development of flexor tendon surgery: Twenty-five years of progress. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25: 214-35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Viegas SF. A new modification of two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006; 10: 177-80
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Frakking TG, Depuydt KP, Kon M, Werker PM. Retrospective outcome analysis of staged flexor tendon reconstruction. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25: 168-74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Coyle Jr MP, Leddy TP, Leddy JP. Staged flexor tendon reconstruction fingertip to palm. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27: 581-5
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Abdul-Kader MH, Amin MA. Two-stage reconstruction for flexor tendon injuries in zone II using a silicone rod and pedicled sublimis tendon graft. Indian J Plast Surg 2010; 43: 14-20
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Sun S, Ding Y, Ma B, Zhou Y. Two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction in zone II using Hunter’s technique. Orthopedics 2010; 33: 880
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Darlis NA, Beris AE, Korompilias AV, Vekris MD, Mitsionis GI, Soucacos PN. Two-stage flexor tendon reconstruction in zone 2 of the hand in children. J Pediatr Orthop 2005; 25: 382-6
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Valenti P, Gilbert A. Two-stage flexor tendon grafting in children. Hand Clin 2000; 16: 573-8 viii
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Elliot D, Giesen T. Treatment of unfavourable results of flexor tendon surgery: Ruptured repairs, tethered repairs and pulley incompetence. Indian J Plast Surg 2013; 46: 458-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar