Functional outcome of patients undergoing replantation of hand at wrist level-7 year experience

 

PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Background: Replantation is defined as reattachment of amputated limb using neurovascular and musculoskeletal structures in order to obtain recovery of limb. Re-vascularisation involves all the above steps in case of limb injuries that result in a near total amputation. Aim and Objective: To study the functional outcome of patients undergoing replantation of hand at wrist level. Material and Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients who underwent replantation of total amputation of hand at wrist level within a period of Jan 2003-June 2010. We evaluated post operative functional outcome compared to uninjured hand taking into consideration: 1. The patient′s overall satisfaction with the hand. 2. Recovery of flexor and extensor function of thumb and fingers. 3. Recovery of thumb opposition. 4. Recovery of sensations in the median and ulnar nerve distribution. 5. Ability of surviving hand to perform daily tasks. Results: There were total seventeen patients and age range was two years to 55 years. Out of 17 patients,16 were males. All the replantations were successful except for one. Summary: The results showed that, although the replanted hands were never functionally as good as the contralateral hand the patients were able to perform most of the daily activities.

• 1 Francois CG, Breidenbach WC, Maldonado C, Kakoulidis TP, Hodges A, Dubernard JM, et al. Hand transplantation: Comparisons and observations of the first four clinical cases. Microsurgery 2000;20:360-71.
• 2 Klapheke MM, Marcell C, Taliaferro G, Creamer B. Psychiatric assessment of candidates for hand transplantation. Microsurgery 2000;20:453-7.
• 3 Hodges A, Chesher S, Feranda S. Hand transplantation: Rehabilitation: Case report. Microsurgery 2000;20:389-92.
• 4 Tark KC, Kim YW, Lee YH, Lew JD. Replantation and revascularization of hands: Clinical analysis and functional results of 261 cases. J Hand Surg Am 1989;14:17-27.
• 5 Ipsen T, Lundkvist L, Barfred T, Pless J. Principles of evaluation and results in microsurgical treatment of major limb amputations. A follow-up study of 26 consecutive cases 1978-1987. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1990;24:75-80.
• 6 Hoang NT. Hand replantations following complete amputations at the wrist joint: First experiences in Hanoi, Vietnam. J Hand Surg Br 2006;31:9-17.
• 7 Waikakul S, Vanadurongwan V, Unnanuntana A. Prognostic factors for major limb re-implantation at both immediate and long-term follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:1024-30.
• 8 Blomgren I, Blomqvist G, Ejeskär A, Fogdestam I, Volkman R, Edshage S. Hand function after replantation or revascularization of upper extremity injuries. A follow-up study of 21 cases operated on 1979-1985 in Göteborg. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1988;22:93-101.
• 9 Chow JA, Bilos ZJ, Chunprapaph B, Hui P. Forearm replantation - Long-term functional results. Ann Plast Surg 1983;10:15-23.
• 10 Hamilton RB, O′Brien BM, Morrison A, MacLeod AM. Survival factors in replantation and revascularization of the amputated thumb - 10 years experience. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1984;18:163-73.
• 11 Meyer VE. Hand amputations proximal but close to the wrist joint: Prime candidates for reattachment (long-term functional results). J Hand Surg Am 1985;10:989-91.
• 12 Tamai S. Twenty years′ experience of limb replantation - Review of 293 upper extremity replants. J Hand Surg Am 1982;7:549-56.
• 13 Vanstraelen P, Papini RP, Sykes PJ, Milling MA. The functional results of hand replantation. The Chepstow experience. J Hand Surg Br 1993;18:556-64.
• 14 Woo SH, Lee YK, Lee HH, Park JK, Kim JY, Dhawan V. Hand replantation with proximal row carpectomy. Hand (N Y) 2009;4:55-61.