Junctional Complexes in the Early Mammalian Embryo

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Preimplantation embryos generate intercellular junctions during differentiation of the trophectoderm epithelium and the formation of the blastocyst. These membrane complexes comprise gap junctions, adherens junctions, tight junctions, and desmosomes, each performing fundamental roles in cellular communication, adhesion, and differentiation. The mouse embryo has been used as a model for the biogenesis of cell junctions. Their construction is achieved by temporally regulated gene expression programs. Mechanisms of junction membrane assembly include the timing of transcription, translation, and posttranslational modifications of specific junctional proteins. Human embryos exhibit similar expression programs, and defects in these programs may contribute to reduced embryo viability.

REFERENCES

• 1 Simon A M, Goodenough D A. Diverse functions of vertebrate gap junctions.  Trends Cell Biol . 1998;  8 477-483
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Barron D J, Valdimarrson G, Paul D L, Kidder G M. Connexin32, a gap junction protein, is a persistent oogenetic product through preimplantation development in the mouse.  Dev Genet . 1989;  10 318-323
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Valdimarrson G, De Sousa A P, Beyer E C, Paul D L, Kidder G M. Zygotic expression of the connexin43 gene supplies subunits for gap junction assembly during mouse preimplantation development.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1991;  30 18-26
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 De Sousa A P, Valdimarsson G, Nicholson B J, Kidder G M. Connexin trafficking and the control of gap junction assembly in mouse preimplantation embryos.  Development . 1993;  117 1355-1367
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Davies T C, Barr K J, Jones D H, Zhu D, Kidder G M. Multiple members of the connexin gene family participate in preimplantation development of the mouse.  Dev Genet . 1996;  18 234-243
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lo C W, Gilula N B. Gap junctional communication in the preimplantation mouse embryo.  Cell . 1979;  18 399-409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Goodall H, Johnson M H. The nature of intercellular coupling within the preimplantation mouse embryo.  J Embryol Exp Morphol . 1984;  79 53-76
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 McLachlin J R, Kidder G M. Intercellular junctional coupling in preimplantation mouse embryos: effect of blocking transcription or translation.  Dev Biol . 1986;  117 146-155
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Valdimarsson G, Kidder G M. Temporal control of gap junction assembly in preimplantation mouse embryos.  J Cell Sci . 1995;  108 1715-1722
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Ogawa H, Oyamada M, Mori T, Mori M, Shimizu H. Relationship of gap junction formation to phosphorylation of connexin43 in mouse preimplantation embryos.  Mol Reprod Dev . 2000;  55 393-398
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Lee S, Gilula N B, Warner A E. Gap junctional communication and compaction during preimplantation stages of mouse development.  Cell . 1987;  51 851-860
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Becker D K, Evans W H, Green C R, Warner A. Functional analysis of amino acid sequences in connexin43 involved in intercellular communication through gap junctions.  J Cell Sci . 1995;  108 1455-1467
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Buehr M, Lee S, McLaren A, Warner A. Reduced gap junctional communication is associated with the lethal condition characteristic of DDK mouse eggs fertilized by foreign sperm.  Development . 1987;  101 449-459
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Leclerc C, Becker D, Buehr M, Warner A. Low intracellular pH is involved in the early embryonic death of DDK mouse eggs fertilized by alien sperm.  Dev Dyn . 1994;  200 257-267
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 De Sousa A P, Juneja S C, Caveney S. Normal development of preimplantation mouse embryos deficient in gap junctional coupling.  J Cell Sci . 1997;  110 1751-1758
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Houghton F D, Thonnissen E, Kidder G M, Naus C CG, Willecke K, Winterhager E. Doubly mutant mice, deficient in connexin32 and -43, show normal prenatal development of organs where the two gap junction proteins are expressed in the same cells.  Dev Genet . 1999;  24 5-12
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Vance M M, Wiley L M. Gap junction intercellular communication mediates the competitive cell proliferation disadvantage of irradiated mouse preimplantation embryos in aggregation chimeras.  Radiat Res . 1999;  152 544-551
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Boni R, Tosti E, Roviello S, Dale B. Intercellular communication in in vivo- and in vitro-produced bovine embryos.  Biol Reprod . 1999;  61 1050-1055
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Wrenzycki C, Herrmann D, Carnwath J W, Niemann H. Expression of the gap junction gene connexin43 (Cx43) in preimplantation bovine embryos derived in vitro or in vivo.  J Reprod Fertil . 1996;  108 17-24
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Niemann H, Wrenzycki C. Alterations of expression of developmentally important genes in preimplantation bovine embryos by in vitro culture conditions: implications for subsequent development.  Theriogenology . 2000;  53 21-34
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Dale B, Gualtieri R, Talevi R, Tosti E, Santella L, Elder K. Intercellular communication in the early human embryo.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1991;  29 22-28
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Hardy K, Warner A, Winston R M, Becker D L. Expression of intercellular junctions during preimplantation development of the human embryo.  Mol Hum Reprod . 1996;  2 621-632
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator.  Science . 1991;  251 1451-1455
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 McCrea P D, Brieher W M, Gumbiner B. Induction of a secondary body axis in Xenopus by antibodies to β-catenin.  J Cell Biol . 1993;  123 477-484
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Yeaman C, Grindstaff K K, Nelson W J. New perspectives on mechanisms involved in generating epithelial cell polarity.  Physiol Rev . 1999;  79 73-98
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Ozawa M, Baribault H, Kemler R. The cytoplasmic domain of the cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin associates with three independent proteins structurally related in different species.  EMBO J . 1989;  8 1711-1717
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 McCrea P D, Turck C W, Gumbiner B. A homolog of the armadillo protein in Drosophila (plakoglobin) associated with E-cadherin.  Science . 1991;  254 1359-1361
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Staddon J M, Smales C, Schulze C, Esch F S, Rubin L L. p120, a p120-related protein (p100), and the cadherin/catenin complex.  J Cell Biol . 1995;  130 369-381
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Hirano S, Nose A, Hatta K, Kawakami A, Takeichi M. Calcium-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecules (cadherins): subclass specificities and possible involvement of actin bundles.  J Cell Biol . 1987;  105 2501-2510
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Rimm D L, Koslov E R, Kebriaei P, Cianci C D, Morrow J S. Alpha 1(E)-catenin in an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1995;  92 8813-8817
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Aberle H, Schwartz H, Kemler R. Cadherin-catenin complex: protein interactions and their implications for cadherin function.  J Cell Biochem . 1996;  61 514-523
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Vestweber D, Gossler A, Boller K, Kemler R. Expression and distribution of cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in mouse preimplantation embryos.  Dev Biol . 1987;  124 451-456
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Johnson M H, Maro B, Takeichi M. The role of cell adhesion in the synchronisation and orientation of polarization in 8-cell mouse blastomeres.  J Embryol Exp Morphol . 1986;  93 239-255
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Sefton M, Johnson M H, Clayton L. Synthesis and phosphorylation of uvomorulin during mouse early development.  Development . 1992;  115 313-318
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Ohsugi M, Hwang S Y, Butz S, Knowles B B, Solter D, Kemler R. Expression and cell membrane localization of catenins during mouse preimplantation development.  Dev Dyn . 1996;  206 391-402
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Winkel G K, Ferguson J E, Takeichi M, Nuccitelli R. Activation of protein kinase C triggers premature compaction in the four-cell stage mouse embryo.  Dev Biol . 1990;  138 1-15
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Pauken C M, Capco D G. Regulation of cell adhesion during embryonic compaction of mammalian embryos: roles for PKC and β-catenin.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1999;  54 135-144
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Sefton M, Johnson M H, Clayton L, McConnell J M. Experimental manipulations of compaction and their effects on the phosphorylation of uvomorulin.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1996;  44 77-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Ohsugi M, Butz S, Kemler R. β-catenin is a major tyrosine-phosphorylated protein during mouse oocyte maturation and preimplantation development.  Dev Dyn . 1999;  216 168-176
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Goval J J, Alexandre H. Effect of genistein on the temporal coordination of cleavage and compaction in mouse preimplantation embryos.  Eur J Morphol . 2000;  38 88-96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Kabir N, Yamamura H, Takagishi Y, Inouye M, Oda S, Hidaka H. Regulation of preimplantation development of mouse embryos: effects of inhibition of myosin light-chain kinase, a Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent enzyme.  J Exp Zool . 1996;  274 101-110
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Larue L, Ohsugi M, Hirchenhain J, Kemler R. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1994;  91 8263-8267
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Riethmacher D, Brinkmann V, Birchmeier C. A targeted mutation in the mouse E-cadherin gene results in defective preimplantation development.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1995;  92 855-859
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Wianny F, Zernicka-Goetz M. Specific interference with gene function by double-stranded RNA in early mouse development.  Nat Cell Biol . 2000;  2 70-75
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Torres M, Stoykova A, Huber O. An α-E-catenin gene trap mutation defines its function in preimplantation development.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1997;  94 901-906
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Ziomek C A, Johnson M H. Cell surface interactions induce polarisation of mouse 8-cell blastomeres at compaction.  Cell . 1980;  21 935-942
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Handyside A H. Distribution of antibody- and lectin-binding sites on dissociated blastomeres of mouse morulae: evidence for polarization at compaction.  J Embryol Exp Morphol . 1980;  60 99-116
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Johnson M H, Maro B. The distribution of cytoplasmic actin in mouse 8-cell blastomeres.  J Embryol Exp Morphol . 1984;  82 97-117
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Fleming T P, Pickering S J. Maturation and polarisation of the endocytotic system in outside blastomeres during mouse preimplantation development.  J Embryol Exp Morphol . 1985;  89 175-208
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Houliston E, Pickering S J, Maro B. Redistribution of microtubules and pericentriolar material during the development of polarity in mouse blastomeres.  J Cell Biol . 1987;  104 1299-1308
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Clayton L, Hall A, Johnson M H. A role for rho-like GTPases in the polarisation of mouse eight-cell blastomeres.  Dev Biol . 1999;  205 322-331
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Johnson M H, Ziomek C A. The foundation of two distinct cell lineages within mouse morula.  Cell . 1981;  24 71-80
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Fleming T P. A quantitative analysis of cell allocation to trophectoderm and inner cell mass in the mouse blastocyst.  Dev Biol . 1987;  119 520-531
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Barcroft L C, Hay-Schmidt A, Caveney A. Trophectoderm differentiation in the bovine embryo: characterization of a polarized epithelium.  J Reprod Fertil . 1998;  114 327-339
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Reima I, Lehtonen E, Virtanen I, Flechon J E. The cytoskeleton and associated proteins during cleavage, compaction and blastocyst differentiation in the pig.  Differentiation . 1993;  54 35-45
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 Plante L, King W A. Light and electron microscopic analysis of bovine embryos derived by in vitro and in vivo fertilization.  J Assist Reprod Genet . 1994;  11 515-529
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Walker S K, Hartwich K M, Seamark R F. The production of unusually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concepts and challenges.  Theriogenology . 1996;  45 111-120
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Van Soom A, Boerjan M L, Bols P E. Timing of compaction and inner cell allocation in bovine embryos produced in vivo after superovulation.  Biol Reprod . 1997;  57 1041-1049
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 59 Campbell S, Swann H R, Seif M W, Kimber S J, Aplin J D. Cell adhesion molecules on the oocyte and preimplantation human embryo.  Hum Reprod . 1995;  10 1571-1578
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Rufas O, Fisch B, Ziv S, Shalgi R. Expression of cadherin adhesion molecules on human gametes.  Mol Hum Reprod . 2000;  6 163-169
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Nikas G, Ao A, Winston R M, Handyside A H. Compaction and surface polarity in the human embryo in vitro.  Biol Reprod . 1996;  55 32-37
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Stevenson B R, Keon B H. The tight junction: morphology to molecules.  Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol . 1998;  14 89-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 Furuse M, Hirase T, Itoh M. Occludin: a novel integral membrane protein localising at tight junctions.  J Cell Biol . 1993;  123 1777-1788
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Furuse M, Fujita K, Hiiragi T, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S. Claudin-1 and -2: novel integral membrane proteins localizing at tight junctions with no sequence similarity to occludin.  J Cell Biol . 1998;  141 1539-1550
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Morita K, Furuse M, Fujimoto K, Tsukita S. Claudin multigene family encoding four-transmembrane domain protein components of tight junction strands.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1999;  96 511-516
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 McCarthy K M, Skare I B, Stankewich M C. Occludin is a functional component of the tight junction.  J Cell Sci . 1996;  109 2287-2298
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Van Itallie M C, Anderson J M. Occludin confers adhesiveness when expressed in fibroblasts.  J Cell Sci . 1997;  110 1113-1121
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Wong V, Gumbiner B M. A synthetic peptide corresponding to the extracellular domain of occludin perturbs the tight junction permeability barrier.  J Cell Biol . 1997;  136 399-409
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Stevenson B R, Siliciano J D, Mooseker M S, Goodenough D A. Identification of ZO-1: a high molecular weight polypeptide associated with the tight junction (zonula occludens) in a variety of epithelia.  J Cell Biol . 1986;  103 755-766
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Citi S, Sabanay H, Jakes R, Geiger B, Kendrick-Jones J. Cingulin: a new peripheral component of tight junctions.  Nature . 1988;  333 272-276
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Willott E, Balda M S, Fanning A S, Jameson B, Van Itallie C, Anderson J M. The tight junction protein ZO-1 is homologous to the Drosophila discs-large tumor suppressor protein of septate junctions.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A . 1993;  90 7834-7838
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 72 Furuse M, Itoh M, Hirase T. Direct association of occludin with ZO-1 and its possible involvement in the localisation of occludin at tight junctions.  J Cell Biol . 1994;  127 1617-1626
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Beatch M, Jesaitis L A, Gallin W J, Goodenough D A, Stevenson B R. The tight junction protein ZO-2 contains three PDZ (PSD-95/Discs-Large/ZO-1) domains and an alternatively spliced region.  J Biol Chem . 1996;  271 25723-25726
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Cordenonsi M, D'Atri F, Hammar E. Cingulin contains globular and coiled-coil domains and interacts with ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3, and myosin.  J Cell Biol . 1999;  147 1569-1582
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Cordenonsi M, Turco F, D'Atri F. Xenopus laevis occludin: identification of in vitro phosphorylation sites by protein kinase CK2 and association with cingulin.  Eur J Biochem . 1999;  264 374-384
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Itoh M, Furuse M, Morita K, Kubota K, Saitou M, Tsukita S. Direct binding of three tight junction-associated MAGUKs, ZO-1, ZO-2 and ZO-3, with the COOH termini of claudins.  J Cell Biol . 1999;  147 1351-1363
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Fanning A S, Jameson B J, Jesaitis L A, Anderson J M. The tight junction protein ZO-1 establishes a link between the transmembrane protein occludin and the actin cytoskeleton.  J Biol Chem . 1998;  273 29745-29753
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Wittchen E S, Haskins J, Stevenson B R. Protein interactions at the tight junction. Actin has multiple binding partners, and ZO-1 forms independent complexes with ZO-2 and ZO-3.  J Biol Chem . 1999;  274 35179-35185
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Anderson J M. Cell signalling: MAGUK magic.  Curr Biol . 1996;  6 382-384
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Balda M S, Anderson J M. Two classes of tight junctions are revealed by ZO-1 isoforms.  Am J Physiol . 1993;  264 C918-C924
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Fleming T P, McConnell J, Johnson M H, Stevenson B R. Development of tight junctions de novo in the mouse early embryo: control of assembly of the tight junction-specific protein, ZO-1.  J Cell Biol . 1989;  108 1407-1418
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Ohsugi M, Larue L, Schwarz H, Kemler R. Cell-junctional and cytoskeletal organization in mouse blastocysts lacking E-cadherin.  Dev Biol . 1997;  185 261-271
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Javed Q, Fleming T P, Hay M, Citi S. Tight junction protein cingulin is expressed by maternal and embryonic genomes during early mouse development.  Development . 1993;  117 1145-1151
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Sheth B, Fesenko I, Collins J E. Tight junction assembly during mouse blastocyst formation is regulated by late expression of ZO-1α+ isoform.  Development . 1997;  124 2027-2037
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Sheth B, Fontaine J-J, Ponza E. Differentiation of the epithelial apical junctional complex during mouse preimplantation development: a role for rab13 in the early maturation of the tight junction.  Mech Dev . 2000;  97 93-104
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 Novick P, Zerial M. The diversity of rab proteins in vesicle transport.  Curr Opin Cell Biol . 1997;  9 496-504
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Chavrier P, Goud B. The role of ARF and rab GTPases in membrane transport.  Curr Opin Cell Biol . 1999;  11 466-475
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 88 Zahraoui A, Joberty G, Arpin M. A small rab GTPase is distributed in cytoplasmic vesicles in non-polarised cells but colocalised with the tight junction marker ZO-1 in polarised epithelial cells.  J Cell Biol . 1994;  124 101-115
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Fleming T P, Hay M, Javed Q, Citi S. Localisation of tight junction protein cingulin is temporally and spatially regulated during early mouse development.  Development . 1993;  117 1135-1144
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Sheth B, Moran B, Anderson B M, Fleming T P. Post-translational control of occludin membrane assembly in mouse trophectoderm: a mechanism to regulate timing of tight junction biogenesis and blastocyst formation.  Development . 2000;  127 831-840
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Rajasekaran A K, Hojo M, Huima T, Rodgiguez-Boulan E. Catenins and zonula occludens-1 form a complex during early stages in the assembly of tight junctions.  J Cell Biol . 1996;  132 451-463
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Ando-Akatsuka Y, Yonemura S, Itoh M, Furuse M, Tsukita S. Differential behavior of E-cadherin and occludin in their colocalization with ZO-1 during the establishment of epithelial cell polarity.  J Cell Physiol . 1999;  179 115-125
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Tesarik J. Involvement of oocyte-coded message in cell differentiation control of early human embryos.  Development . 1989;  105 317-322
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Gualtieri R, Santella L, Dale B. Tight junctions and cavitation in the human pre-embryo.  Mol Reprod Dev . 1992;  32 81-87
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Garrod D, Chidgey M, North A. Desmosomes: differentiation, development, dynamics and disease.  Curr Opin Cell Biol . 1996;  8 670-678
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Collins J E, Legan P K, Kenny T P, MacGarvie J, Holton J L, Garrod D R. Cloning and sequence analysis of desmosomal glycoproteins 2 and 3 (desmocollins): cadherin-like desmosomal adhesion molecules with heterogeneous cytoplasmic domains.  J Cell Biol . 1991;  113 381-391
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Fleming T P, Garrod D R, Elsmore A J. Desmosome biogenesis in the mouse preimplantation embryo.  Development . 1991;  112 527-539
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Collins J E, Lorimer J E, Garrod D R, Pidsley S C, Buxton R S, Fleming T P. Regulation of desmocollin transcription in mouse preimplantation embryos.  Development . 1995;  121 743-753
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 99 Hardy K, Warner A, Winston R M, Becker D L. Expression of intercellular junctions during preimplantation development of the human embryo.  Mol Hum Reprod . 1996;  2 621-632
  PubMedGoogle Scholar