Bedeutung der Sonografie in der Palliativmedizin (Palliative Sonografie) Teil 2

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

In Ergänzung zum ersten Teil dieser Übersicht, der auf sonografisch gestützte Interventionen in der Palliativmedizin fokussierte, erläutert die vorliegende Arbeit Indikationen und Möglichkeiten der Sonografie in der Palliativmedizin unter vier wesentlichen Aspekten:

• Sonografie als non-invasives, niedrigschwelliges und bettseitiges Diagnoseverfahren, das in besonderer Weise diagnostische Effizienz und persönliche Zuwendung verbindet.

• Sonografische Nachsorge von Tumorpatienten.

• Gezielter bettseitiger Einsatz der Sonografie in der ambulanten palliativen Versorgung (point-of-care).

• Sonografisch gezielte Durchführung palliativer Entlastungspunktionen und spezieller therapeutischer Interventionen.

Abstract

Complementary to part 1, this review summarizes indications, opportunities and applications of ultrasounds in palliative care medicine. In particular, the following topics are discussed:

• Ultrasound as a non-invasive, low-threshold, bedside technique, which uniquely combines diagnostic efficacy and empathy.

• Sonographic surveillance of patients with malignant disease.

• Point-of-care application of ultrasound in palliative care services.

• Ultrasound-guided palliative interventions (drainage of effusions and other therapeutic procedures).

• Literatur

• 1 Aulbert E. Nauck F. Radbruch L. Lehrbuch der Palliativmedizin. >2. Auf.. Stuttgart: Schattauer; 2007
  Google Scholar
• 2 Huseboe S. Klaschik E. Palliativmedizin. 5. Auflage. Heidelberg: Springer; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 3 Kloke M. Reckinger K. Kloke O. Grundwissen Palliativmedizin. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2009
  Google Scholar
• 4 Muller-Busch HC. Definitions and goals in palliative medicine. Internist 2011; 52: 7-2
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Schindler T. Palliative care in Germany. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2006; 49: 1077-1086
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Gesetz zur Verbesserung der Hospiz- und Palliativversorgung in Deutschland (Hospiz- u. Palliativgesetz – HPG). Bundesgesetzblatt Nr. 48 vom 07.12.2015, Seite 2114. 2015
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 World Health Organisation. WHO Definition of Palliative Care. 2011 http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Dietrich CF. Siehr K. Palliativmedizin. In: Dietrich CF. ed Medizin im Vortrag (Text- und Grafikbausteine für die patientengerechte Präsentation). Balingen: Spitta Verlag; 2011
  Google Scholar
• 9 Nurnberg D. Jenssen C. Cui X. et al. Ultrasound in palliative care medicine. Z Gastroenterol 2015; 53: 409-416
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Barreiros AP. Cui XW. Ignee A. et al. EchoScopy in scanning abdominal diseases: initial clinical experience. Z Gastroenterol 2014; 52: 269-275
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Dietrich CF. Nürnberg D. Interventioneller Ultraschall. Lehratlas der interventionellen Sonografie. Thieme Verlag; 2011
  Google Scholar
• 12 Dietrich CF. Riemer-Hommel P. Challenges for the German Health Care System. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 557-572
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Dietrich CF. Mäurer M. Riemer-Hommel P. Challenges for the German Health Care System. Pharmaceuticals. Endo heute 2014; 27: 45-53
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Dietrich CF. Editorial zum Beitrag: Challenges for the German Health Care System. Z Gastroenterol 2012; 50: 555-556
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Greiner L. Sono-Psychology (EFSUMB-Newsletter). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 94-95
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Greiner L. Sono-Psychology. EFSUMB European Course Book. 2010 http://www.efsumb.org/ecb/ecb-ch021-sonopsychology.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Maio G. The lost art of abstaining: a consequence of industrialized health care. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2015; 140: 1014-1018
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Maio G. Should modern medicine become a service industry? An ethical appraisal of a market-oriented medicine. Ther Umsch 2009; 66: 617-622
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Maio G. Medicine and the holistic understanding of the human being: ultrasound examination as dialog. Ultraschall in Med 2014; 35: 98-107
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Mathis G. Hackspiel S. Gehmacher O. Was empfinden Palliativpatienten bei der bettseitigen Sonografie?. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: P_12_2
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Moehler M. Al Batran SE. Andus T. et al. German S3-guideline "Diagnosis and treatment of esophagogastric cancer". Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 461-531
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Piscaglia F. Nolsoe C. Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 33-59
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Bamber J. Cosgrove D. Dietrich CF. et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: Basic principles and technology. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 169-184
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Cosgrove D. Piscaglia F. Bamber J. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Use of Ultrasound Elastography.Part 2: Clinical Applications. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 238-253
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Dietrich CF. Averkiou MA. Correas JM. et al. An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 344-351
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Dietrich CF. Rudd L. The EFSUMB website, a guide for better understanding. Med Ultrason 2013; 15: 215-223
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 11-29
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Dietrich CF. Cui XW. Barreiros AP. et al. EFSUMB guidelines 2011: comment on emergent indications and visions. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (Suppl. 01) S39-S47
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Dietrich CF. Cui XW. Schreiber-Dietrich DG. et al. EFSUMB guidelines 2011: comments and illustrations. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33 (Suppl. 01) S11-S21
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Schmiegel W. Pox C. Adler G. et al. S3-Guidelines Conference "Colorectal Carcinoma" 2004. Z Gastroenterol 2004; 42: 1129-1177
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Schmiegel W. Pox C. Reinacher-Schick A. et al. S3 guidelines for colorectal carcinoma: results of an evidence-based consensus conference on February 6/7, 2004 and June 8/9, 2007 (for the topics IV, VI and VII). Z Gastroenterol 2010; 48: 65-136
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Adler G. Seufferlein T. Bischoff SC. et al. S3-Guidelines "Exocrine pancreatic cancer" 2007. Z Gastroenterol 2007; 45: 487-523
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Beckmann MW. von Minkwitz G. Pfisterer J. To follow up or not to follow up? Nachsorge beim Mammakarzinom und bei gynäkologischen Tumoren. Frauenarzt 2004; 45: 316-323
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 11-29
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Jurgensen C. Dietrich CF. Role of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the staging of rectal cancer. Z Gastroenterol 2008; 46: 580-589
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Seufferlein T. Adler G. The S3 guideline exocrine pancreatic cancer. Med Klin (Munich) 2009; 104: 869-874
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Floriani I. Torri V. Rulli E. et al. Performance of imaging modalities in diagnosis of liver metastases from colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 19-31
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Kinkel K. Lu Y. Both M. et al. Detection of hepatic metastases from cancers of the gastrointestinal tract by using noninvasive imaging methods (US, CT, MR imaging, PET): a meta-analysis. Radiology 2002; 224: 748-756
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Dietrich CF. Kratzer W. Strobe D. et al. Assessment of metastatic liver disease in patients with primary extrahepatic tumors by contrast-enhanced sonography versus CT and MRI. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12: 1699-1705
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Bernatik T. Seitz K. Blank W. et al. Unclear focal liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasonography – lessons to be learned from the DEGUM multicenter study for the characterization of liver tumors. Ultraschall in Med 2010; 31: 577-581
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Strobel D. Seitz K. Blank W. et al. Tumor-specific vascularization pattern of liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia in the differential diagnosis of 1349 liver lesions in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 376-382
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Piscaglia F. Nolsoe C. Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 33-59
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 11-29
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Seitz K. Strobel D. Bernatik T. et al. Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for the characterization of focal liver lesions – prospective comparison in clinical practice: CEUS vs. CT (DEGUM multicenter trial). Parts of this manuscript were presented at the Ultrasound Dreilandertreffen 2008, Davos. Ultraschall in Med 2009; 30: 383-389
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Chiorean L. Tana C. Braden B. et al. Advantages and Limitations of Focal Liver Lesions Assessment with Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Comments to the European Federation of Societies for Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology (EFSUMB) Guidelines. Med Princ Pract 2016; 25: 399-407
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Chiorean L. Caraiani C. Radzina M. et al. Vascular phases in imaging and their role in focal liver lesions assessment. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2015; 62: 299-326
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Chiorean L. Cantisani V. Jenssen C. et al. Focal masses in a non-cirrhotic liver: The additional benefit of CEUS over baseline imaging. Eur J Radiol 2015; 84: 1636-1643
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Cantisani V. Grazhdani H. Fioravanti C. et al. Liver metastases: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound compared with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. World J Gastroenterol 2014; 20: 9998-10007
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Bhatia KS. Griffith JF. Ahuja AT. Stomach cancer: prevalence and significance of neck nodal metastases on sonography. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1968-1972
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Kim DW. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for retrojugular lymph nodes in the neck. World J Surg Oncol 2013; 11: 121
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Omloo JM. van Heijl M. Smits NJ. et al. Additional value of external ultrasonography of the neck after CT and PET scanning in the preoperative assessment of patients with esophageal cancer. Dig Surg 2009; 26: 43-49
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Prosch H. Strasser G. Sonka C. et al. Cervical ultrasound (US) and US-guided lymph node biopsy as a routine procedure for staging of lung cancer. Ultraschall in Med 2007; 28: 598-603
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Schreurs LM. Verhoef CC. van der Jagt EJ. et al. Current relevance of cervical ultrasonography in staging cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Eur J Radiol 2008; 67: 105-111
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 54 Van Overhagen H. Lameris JS. Berger MY. et al. Improved assessment of supraclavicular and abdominal metastases in oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction carcinoma with the combination of ultrasound and computed tomography. Br J Radiol 1993; 66: 203-208
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 55 Van Overhagen H. Lameris JS. Berger MY. et al. Assessment of distant metastases with ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy and cytologic study in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Gastrointest Radiol 1992; 17: 305-310
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 56 van Vliet EP. van der Lugt A. Kuipers EJ. et al. Ultrasound, computed tomography, or the combination for the detection of supraclavicular lymph nodes in patients with esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a comparative study. J Surg Oncol 2007; 96: 200-206
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 57 Dietrich CF. Jenssen C. Evidence based endoscopic ultrasound. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 599-621
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 58 Dietrich CF. Ultraschall-Kurs. 6. Auflage. Köln: Deutscher Ärzteverlag; 2012
  Google Scholar
• 59 Jenssen C. Siebert C. Gottschalk U. The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound in M-Staging of Gastrointestinal and Pancreaticobiliary Cancer. Video Journal and Encyclopedia of GI Endoscopy 2013; 3: 105-109
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 60 Jenssen C. Dietrich CF. Burmester E. Malignant neoplasias of the gastrointestinal tract--endosonographic staging revisited. Z Gastroenterol 2011; 49: 357-368
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 61 Dietrich CF. Hirche TO. Schreiber D. et al. Sonographie von Pleura und Lunge. Ultraschall in Med 2003; 24: 303-311
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 62 Eisenhauer EA. Therasse P. Bogaerts J. et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 228-247
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 63 van Persijn van Meerten EL. Gelderblom H. Bloem JL. RECIST revised: implications for the radiologist.A review article on the modified RECIST guideline. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1456-1467
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 64 Lassau N. Cosgrove D. Armand JP. Early evaluation of targeted drugs using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for personalized medicine. Future Oncol 2012; 8: 1215-1218
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 65 Ignee A. Jedrejczyk M. Schuessler G. et al. Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves-Reliability and potential sources of errors. Eur J Radiol 2010; 73: 153-158
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 66 Pox C. Aretz S. Bischoff SC. et al. S3-guideline colorectal cancer version 1.0. Z Gastroenterol 2013; 51: 753-854
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 67 Vogl TJ. Schmiegel W. Pox C. et al. S3 guideline – Diagnosis and treatment of colorectal carcinoma: relevance for radiologic imaging and interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2013; 185: 699-708
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 68 Grenacher L. Schwarz M. Lordick F. et al. S3 guideline – diagnosis and treatment of gastric carcinoma: relevance for radiologic imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2012; 184: 706-712
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 69 Claudon M. Dietrich CF. Choi BI. et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the liver – update 2012: a WFUMB-EFSUMB initiative in cooperation with representatives of AFSUMB, AIUM, ASUM, FLAUS and ICUS. Ultraschall in Med 2013; 34: 11-29
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 70 Bernatik T. Schuler A. Kunze G. et al. Benefit of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Follow-Up Care of Patients with Colon Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Study. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 590-593
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 71 Nürnberg D. Palliativmedizinische Interventionen und Bedeutung der Sonografie in der Palliativmedizin. In: Dietrich CF. Nürnberg D. (Hg). Interventioneller Ultraschall. Thieme-Verlag; 2011: 565-573
  Google Scholar
• 72 Piscaglia F. Nolsoe C. Dietrich CF. et al. The EFSUMB Guidelines and Recommendations on the Clinical Practice of Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall in Med 2012; 33: 33-59
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 73 Sumukadas D. Witham MD. Gillespie ND. Use of hand-held echocardiography to facilitate the management of cardiac disease in older people. Scott Med J 2011; 56: 23-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 74 Wastl D. Helwig K. Dietrich CF. Examination concepts and procedures in emergency ultrasonography. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2015; 110: 231-239
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 75 Moore CL. Copel JA. Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 749-757
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 76 Agricola E. Arbelot C. Blaivas M. et al. Ultrasound performs better than radiographs. Thorax 2011; 66: 828-829
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 77 Dietrich CF. Mathis G. Blaivas M. et al. Lung B-line artefacts and their use. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8: 1356-1365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 78 Volpicelli G. Elbarbary M. Blaivas M. et al. International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 2012; 38: 577-591
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 79 Chavez MA. Shams N. Ellington LE. et al. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Respir Res 2014; 15: 50
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 80 Dietrich CF. Mathis G. Cui XW. et al. Ultrasound of the pleurae and lungs. Ultrasound Med Biol 2015; 41: 351-365
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 81 Dietrich CF. Hocke M. Braden B. Echoscopy. Praxis (Bern 1994) 2015; 104: 1005-1012
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 82 Wastl D. Borgmann T. Helwig K. et al. Rapid diagnostic in the emergency unit: bedside sonography. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2016; 141: 317-321
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 83 Via G. Hussain A. Wells M. et al. International evidence-based recommendations for focused cardiac ultrasound. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27: 683
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 84 Voltz R. Palliativmedizin – Eine Disziplin für den „ganzen Menschen". Deutsches Ärzteblatt 2008; 105: A 80-A 82
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 85 Deutscher Hospiz- und Palliativverband e.V. Hintergründe der SAPV. http://www.ag-sapv.de/rechtlicher-rahmen.html2011
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 86 SAPV – spezialisierte ambulante Palliativversorgung. 2011 http://www.sapv.de/dokumente.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 87 Wilckens HH. Ignee A. Kaeppler M. et al. Interventionen am Nervensystem, ultraschallgestützte Regionalanästhesie. In: Dietrich CF. Nürnberg D. (Hg). Interventionelle Sonografie. Thieme Verlag; 2011: 453-473
  Google Scholar
• 88 Dietrich CF. Lorentzen T. Sidhu PS. et al. An Introduction to the EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 460-463
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 89 Lorentzen T. Nolsoe CP. Ewertsen C. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (Short Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 464-472
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 90 Lorentzen T. Nolsoe CP. Ewertsen C. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part I. General Aspects (long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: E1-E14
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 91 Sidhu PS. Brabrand K. Cantisani V. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: 566-580
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 92 Sidhu PS. Brabrand K. Cantisani V. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part II. Ultraschall in Med 2015; 36: E15-E35
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 93 Dietrich CF. Lorentzen T. Appelbaum L. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part III. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: E1-E32
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 94 Jenssen C. Hocke M. Fusaroli P. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part IV – EUS-guided Interventions: General aspects and EUS-guided sampling (Long Version). Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: E33-E76
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 95 Fusaroli P. Jenssen C. Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part V. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: E77-E99
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 96 Jenssen C. Brkljacic B. Hocke M. et al. EFSUMB Guidelines on Interventional Ultrasound (INVUS), Part VI. Ultraschall in Med 2016; 37: 473-476
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 97 Dietrich CF. EFSUMB guidelines 2015 on interventional ultrasound. Med Ultrason 2015; 17: 521-527
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 98 Dietrich CF. Horn R. Morf S. et al. US-guided peripheral vascular interventions, comments on the EFSUMB guidelines. Med Ultrason 2016; 18: 231-239
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar