Download PDF
Appl Clin Inform 2020; 11(01): 160-165
DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1701678
Research Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Is the Climb Worth the View? The Savings/Alert Ratio for Reducing Vitamin D Testing

Chase D. Hendrickson
1   Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Michael F. McLemore
2   Health Information Technology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Kathryn M. Dahir
1   Division of Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Shari Just
2   Health Information Technology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Zahra Shajani-Yi
3   Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Joseph LeGrand
2   Health Information Technology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Christoph U. Lehmann
4   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
,
Asli Weitkamp
2   Health Information Technology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
4   Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

24 September 2019

01 January 2020

Publication Date:
26 February 2020 (online)

   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Despite guideline recommendations, vitamin D testing has increased substantially. Clinical decision support (CDS) presents an opportunity to reduce inappropriate laboratory testing.

Objectives and Methods To reduce inappropriate testing of vitamin D at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, a CDS assigned providers to receive or not receive an electronic alert each time a 25-hydroxyvitamin D assay was ordered for an adult patient unless the order was associated with a diagnosis in the patient's chart for which vitamin D testing is recommended. The CDS ran for 80 days, collecting data on number of tests, provider information, and basic patient demographics.

Results During the 80 days, providers placed 12,368 orders for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. The intervention group ordered a vitamin D assay and received the alert for potentially inappropriate testing 2,181 times and completed the 25-hydroxyvitamin D order in 89.9% of encounters, while the control group ordered a vitamin D assay (without receiving an alert) 2,032 times and completed the order in 98.1% of encounters, for an absolute reduction of testing of 8% (p < 0.001).

Conclusion This CDS reduced vitamin D ordering by utilizing a soft-stop approach. At a charge of $179.00 per test and a cost to the laboratory of $4.20 per test, each display of the alert led to an average reduction of $14.70 in charges and of $0.34 in spending by the laboratory (the savings/alert ratio). By describing the effectiveness of an electronic alert in terms of the savings/alert ratio, the impact of this intervention can be better appreciated and compared with other interventions.

Keywords

clinical decision support alerting - order entry - quality improvement - clinical practice guidelines - ambulatory care

Protection of Human and Animal Subjects

The study was evaluated by VUMC's Institutional Review Board and granted an exemption, as it met criteria for a quality improvement initiative. This study was also reviewed and approved by VUMC's Laboratory Formulary Committee.


 

  • References

  • 1 Kotta S, Gadhvi D, Jakeways N. , et al. “Test me and treat me”--attitudes to vitamin D deficiency and supplementation: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (07) e007401
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Taylor CL, Thomas PR, Aloia JF, Millard PS, Rosen CJ. Questions about vitamin D for primary care practice: input from an NIH conference. Am J Med 2015; 128 (11) 1167-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Manson JE, Cook NR, Lee IM. , et al; VITAL Research Group. Vitamin D supplements and prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2019; 380 (01) 33-44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 LeFevre ML. ; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2015; 162 (02) 133-140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA. , et al; Endocrine Society. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2011; 96 (07) 1911-1930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Delvaux N, Van Thienen K, Heselmans A, de Velde SV, Ramaekers D, Aertgeerts B. The effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on laboratory test ordering: a systematic review. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2017; 141 (04) 585-595
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Stenner SP, Chakravarthy R, Johnson KB. , et al. ePrescribing: reducing costs through in-class therapeutic interchange. Appl Clin Inform 2016; 7 (04) 1168-1181
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 White DR, Hamilton KW, Pegues DA, Hanish A, Umscheid CA. The impact of a computerized clinical decision support tool on inappropriate Clostridium difficile testing. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017; 38 (10) 1204-1208
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gottheil S, Khemani E, Copley K. , et al. Reducing inappropriate ESR testing with computerized clinical decision support. BMJ Qual Improv Rep 2016; 5 (01) u211376.w4582
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kanzaria HK, Hoffman JR, Probst MA, Caloyeras JP, Berry SH, Brook RH. Emergency physician perceptions of medically unnecessary advanced diagnostic imaging. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22 (04) 390-398
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Lippi G, Brambilla M, Bonelli P. , et al. Effectiveness of a computerized alert system based on re-testing intervals for limiting the inappropriateness of laboratory test requests. Clin Biochem 2015; 48 (16,17): 1174-1176
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Yarahuan JW, Billet A, Hron JD. A quality improvement initiative to decrease platelet ordering errors and a proposed model for evaluating clinical decision support effectiveness. Appl Clin Inform 2019; 10 (03) 505-512
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Felcher AH, Gold R, Mosen DM, Stoneburner AB. Decrease in unnecessary vitamin D testing using clinical decision support tools: making it harder to do the wrong thing. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2017; 24 (04) 776-780
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Petrilli CM, Henderson J, Keedy JM. , et al. Reducing unnecessary vitamin D screening in an academic health system: what works and when. Am J Med 2018; 131 (12) 1444-1448
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Ferrari R, Prosser C. Testing vitamin D levels and choosing wisely. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176 (07) 1019-1020
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Naugler C, Hemmelgarn B, Quan H. , et al. Implementation of an intervention to reduce population-based screening for vitamin D deficiency: a cross-sectional study. CMAJ Open 2017; 5 (01) E36-E39
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Pelloso M, Basso D, Padoan A, Fogar P, Plebani M. Computer-based-limited and personalised education management maximise appropriateness of vitamin D, vitamin B12 and folate retesting. J Clin Pathol 2016; 69 (09) 777-783
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rockwell M, Kraak V, Hulver M, Epling J. Clinical management of low vitamin D: a scoping review of physicians' practices. Nutrients 2018; 10 (04) E493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bilinski K, Boyages S. Evidence of overtesting for vitamin D in Australia: an analysis of 4.5 years of Medicare benefits schedule (MBS) data. BMJ Open 2013; 3 (06) e002955
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Signorelli H, Straseski JA, Genzen JR, Walker BS, Jackson BR, Schmidt RL. Benchmarking to identify practice variation in test ordering: a potential tool for utilization management. Lab Med 2015; 46 (04) 356-364
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Woodford HJ, Barrett S, Pattman S. Vitamin D: too much testing and treating?. Clin Med (Lond) 2018; 18 (03) 196-200
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rodd C, Sokoro A, Lix LM. , et al. Increased rates of 25-hydroxy vitamin D testing: Dissecting a modern epidemic. Clin Biochem 2018; 59: 56-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Deschasaux M, Souberbielle JC, Andreeva VA. , et al. Quick and easy screening for vitamin D insufficiency in adults: a scoring system to be implemented in daily clinical practice. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016; 95 (07) e2783
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Carli D, Fahrni G, Bonnabry P, Lovis C. Quality of decision support in computerized provider order entry: systematic literature review. JMIR Med Inform 2018; 6 (01) e3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Pilz S, Zittermann A, Trummer C. , et al. Vitamin D testing and treatment: a narrative review of current evidence. Endocr Connect 2019; 8 (02) R27-R43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Sheehan B, Kaufman D, Bakken S, Currie LM. Cognitive analysis of decision support for antibiotic ordering in a neonatal intensive care unit. Appl Clin Inform 2012; 3 (01) 105-123
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar