Aktuelle Empfehlungen zur Prävention und Therapie des familiären Mammakarzinoms

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Unterschiede zwischen genetisch bedingten und sporadisch auftretenden Mammakarzinomen kristallisieren sich zunehmend heraus; diese werden die Behandlung des familiären Mammakarzinoms in Zukunft noch mehr beeinflussen als heute. Die Rolle von Carboplatin in der systemischen Therapie des BRCA-assoziierten Mammakarzinoms und von PARP-Inhibitoren auch bei BRCA-assoziierten Ovarialkarzinomen wird in internationalen Studien evaluiert. Aber bereits jetzt gilt es, die Maßnahmen der Prävention angesichts der hohen Erkrankungsrisiken wahrzunehmen. Bei Trägerinnen einer pathogenen Mutation in den Genen BRCA1 und BRCA2 besteht ein lebenslanges Risiko für ein Mammakarzinom von bis zu 80 % und für ein Ovarialkarzinom von bis zu 54 %. Neben der Teilnahme an einem intensivierten Früherkennungsprogramm ist auch die Durchführung prophylaktischer Operationen mit Entfernung der Brustdrüse und der Adnexe zur Risikominimierung möglich. Die Betreuung von Risikopatientinnen in den 12 Zentren des Deutschen Konsortiums für Familiären Brust- und Eierstockkrebs erfolgt unter Studienbedingungen. Wissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse auf den Gebieten der radiologischen Diagnostik, Tumorgenese, Tumortherapie und Lebensqualität werden sich davon ableiten. Die aktuellen Empfehlungen des Deutschen Konsortiums zum Management des familiären Mammakarzinoms werden im Folgenden beschrieben.

Abstract

The differences between genetic and sporadic breast cancer are becoming increasingly obvious and this will therefore have an impact on the treatment of hereditary breast cancer in future. The benefit of carboplatin in the therapy of the BRCA-associated breast and ovarian cancer and of PARP-inhibitors is currently being evaluated in international trials. The lifetime risk for carriers of a pathogenic mutation in the genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 is as high as 80 % for breast cancer and up to 54 % for ovarian cancer. In addition to participating in an intensified surveillance program, prophylactic breast and ovarian surgery are options which may reduce risk. The medical care of at-risk patients in the 12 centers of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer is carried out under trial conditions. The research findings in the fields of radiological diagnostics, tumorigenesis, systemic therapy, and quality of life will be analyzed. The current recommendations of the German Consortium regarding the management of hereditary breast cancer are described here.

Literatur

• 1 Atchley D P, Albarracin C T, Lopez A et al. Clinical and pathologic characteristics of patients with BRCA-positive and BRCA-negative breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2008;  26 4282-4288
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Budroni M, Cesaraccio R, Coviello V et al. Role of BRCA2 mutation status on overall survival among breast cancer patients from Sardinia.  BMC Cancer. 2009;  9 62
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Rennert G, Bisland-Naggan S, Barnett-Grinnes O et al. Clinical outcome of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.  N Engl J Med. 2007;  357 115-123
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Brekelmans C T M, Seynaeve C, Menke-Pluymers M et al. Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer.  Ann Oncology. 2006;  17 391-400
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Robson M E, Chappuis P O, Satagopan J et al. A combined analysis of outcome following breast cancer: differences in survival based on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation status and administration of adjuvant treatment.  Breast Cancer Res. 2004;  6 8-17
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Hagen A I, Tretli S, Maele L et al. Survival in Norwegian BRCA1 mutation carriers with breast cancer.  Hered Cancer Clin Practice. 2009;  7 7
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Byrski T, Gornwald J, Huzarski T The Polish Hereditary Breast Cancer Consortium et al. Response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in women with BRCA1-positive breast cancers.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;  108 289-296
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Husain A, He G, Venkatraman E S et al. BRCA1 up-regulation is associated with repair-mediated resistance to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum (II).  Cancer Res. 1998;  58 1120-1123
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Tan D S P, Rothermundt C, Thomas K et al. “BRCAness” syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.  J Clin Oncol. 2008;  26 5530-5536
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Cass I, Baldwin R L, Varkey T et al. Improved survival in women with BRCA-associated ovarian carcinoma.  Cancer. 2003;  97 2187-2195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Bryant H, Schultz N, Thomas H et al. Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.  Nature. 2005;  434 913-916
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Farmer H, McCabe N, Lord C J et al. Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.  Nature. 2005;  434 917-921
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Moynahan M E, Pierce A J, Jasin M. BRCA2 is required for homology directed repair of chromosomal breaks.  Mol Cell. 2001;  7 263-272
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Meric-Bernstam F. Heterogenic loss of BRCA in breast cancer: the “two-hit” hypothesis takes a hit.  An Surg Oncol. 2007;  14 2428-2429
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Risch H A, McLaughlin J R, Cole D E C et al. Prevalence and penetrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population series of 649 women with ovarian cancer.  Am J Hum Genet. 2001;  68 700-710
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Antoniou A, Pharoah P D, Narod S et al. Average risk of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies.  Am J Hum Genet. 2003;  72 1117-1130
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 King M C, Mraks J H, Mandell J B. for the New York Breast Cancer Study Group . Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.  Science. 2003;  302 643-646
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Meijers-Heijboer H, van den Ouweland A, Klijn J CHEK2-Breast Cancer Consortium et al.. Low-penetrance susceptibility to breast cancer due to CHEK2(*)1100delC in noncarriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.  Nat Genet. 2002;  31 55-59
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Teraoka S N, Malone K E, Doody D R et al. Increased frequency of ATM mutations in breast carcinoma patients with early onset disease and ovarian cancer.  Cancer. 2001;  93 479-487
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Antoniou A C, Spurdle A B, Sinilnikova O M et al. Common breast cancer-predisposition alleles are associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.  Am J Hum Genet. 2008;  82 937-948
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Robson M E, Svahn T, McCormick B et al. Appropriateness of breast-conserving treatment of brest carcinoma in women with germline mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2: a clinic-based series.  Cancer. 2005;  103 44-51
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Metcalfe K A, Lynch H T, Ghadirian P et al. Contralateral breast cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers.  J Clin Oncol. 2004;  22 2328-2335
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Pierce L J, Levin A M, Rebbeck T R et al. Ten-year multi-institutional results of breast-conserving surgery and radiotherapy in BRCA1/2-associated stage I/II breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2006;  24 2437-2443
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Hartmann L C, Sellers T A, Schaid D J et al. Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;  93 1633-1637
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Rebbeck T R, Friebel T, Lynch H T et al. Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE study group.  J Clin Oncology. 2004;  22 1055-1062
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Temple W J, Lindsay R L, Magi E et al. Technical considerations for prophylactic mastectomy in patients at high risk for breast cancer.  Am J Surg. 1991;  161 413-415
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Spear S L, Schwarz K A, Venturi M L et al. Prophylactic mastectomy and reconstruction: clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction.  Breast. 2008;  122 1-9
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Metcalfe K A, Semple J L, Narod S A. Time to reconsider subcutaneous mastectomy for breast cancer prevention?.  Lancet Oncol. 2005;  6 431-434
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Carcangiu M L, Peissel B, Pasini B et al. Incidental carcinomas in prophylactic specimens in BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutation carriers, with emphasis on fallopian tube lesions: report of 6 cases and review of the literature.  Am J Surg Pathol. 2006;  30 1222-1230
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Hermsen B B J, van Diest P J, Berkhof J et al. Low prevalence of (pre) malignant lesions in the breast and high prevalence in the ovary and fallopian tube in women at hereditary high risk of breast and ovarian cancer.  Int J Cancer. 2006;  119 1412-1418
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Metcalfe K A, Finch A, Poll A et al. Breast cancer risks in women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer who have tested negative for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.  Br J Cancer. 2009;  100 421-425
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Kauff N D, Mitra N, Robson M E et al. Risk of ovarian cancer in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation-negative hereditary breast cancer families.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;  97 1382-1384
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Tilanus-Linthorst M M A, Alves C, Seynaeve C et al. Contralateral recurrence and prognostic factors in familial non-BRCA1/2-associated breast cancer.  Br J Surg. 2006;  93 961-968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. med. Karin Kast

Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden

Fetscherstraße 74

01307 Dresden

Email: karin.kast@uniklinikum-dresden.de