Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 6/2016

08-08-2015 | Original Article

Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis

Auteurs: Christina J. Mueller, Lars Kuchinke

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 6/2016

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

Affective flanker tasks often present affective facial expressions as stimuli. However, it is not clear whether the identity of the person on the target picture needs to be the same for the flanker stimuli or whether it is better to use pictures of different persons as flankers. While Grose-Fifer, Rodrigues, Hoover & Zottoli (Advances in Cognitive Psychology 9(2):81–91, 2013) state that attentional focus might be captured by processing the differences between faces, i.e. the identity, and therefore use pictures of the same individual as target and flanker stimuli, Munro, Dywan, Harris, McKee, Unsal & Segalowitz (Biological Psychology, 76:31–42, 2007) propose an advantage in presenting pictures of a different individual as flankers. They state that participants might focus only on small visual changes when targets and flankers are from the same individual instead of processing the affective content of the stimuli. The present study manipulated face identity in a between-subject design. Through investigation of behavioral measures as well as diffusion model parameters, we conclude that both types of flankers work equally efficient. This result seems best supported by recent accounts that propose an advantage of emotional processing over identity processing in face recognition. In the present study, there is no evidence that the processing of the face identity attracts sufficient attention to interfere with the affective evaluation of the target and flanker faces.
Literatuur
go back to reference Blagrove, E., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Ignoring real faces: effects of valence, threat, and salience. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76, 725–745.CrossRef Blagrove, E., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Ignoring real faces: effects of valence, threat, and salience. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76, 725–745.CrossRef
go back to reference Dong, G., Yang, L., & Shen, Y. (2009). The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task. Neuroscience Letters, 460, 1–5.CrossRefPubMed Dong, G., Yang, L., & Shen, Y. (2009). The course of visual searching to a target in a fixed location: electrophysiological evidence from an emotional flanker task. Neuroscience Letters, 460, 1–5.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 13(4), 1–5. Eimer, M., & Holmes, A. (2002). An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 13(4), 1–5.
go back to reference Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16(1), 143–149.CrossRef
go back to reference Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3(4), 327–343.CrossRefPubMed Fenske, M. J., & Eastwood, J. D. (2003). Modulation of focused attention by faces expressing emotion: evidence from flanker tasks. Emotion, 3(4), 327–343.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Grose-Fifer, J., Rodrigues, A., Hoover, S., & Zottoli, T. (2013). Attentional capture by emotional faces in adolescence. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 81–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grose-Fifer, J., Rodrigues, A., Hoover, S., & Zottoli, T. (2013). Attentional capture by emotional faces in adolescence. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9(2), 81–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., & Heumann, M. (2006). Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual emotional differences. Emotion, 6(1), 28–39.CrossRefPubMed Horstmann, G., Borgstedt, K., & Heumann, M. (2006). Flanker effects with faces may depend on perceptual emotional differences. Emotion, 6(1), 28–39.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117(3), 759–784.CrossRefPubMed Hübner, R., Steinhauser, M., & Lehle, C. (2010). A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. Psychological Review, 117(3), 759–784.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis. Cognition, 122, 426–441.CrossRefPubMed Jepma, M., Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2012). Temporal expectation and information processing: a model-based analysis. Cognition, 122, 426–441.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: dissolving the debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.CrossRef Lai, V. T., Hagoort, P., & Casasanto, D. (2012). Affective primacy vs. cognitive primacy: dissolving the debate. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–8.CrossRef
go back to reference Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1377–1388.CrossRef Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1377–1388.CrossRef
go back to reference Lobmaier, J. S., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction. Emotion, 8(4), 573–577.CrossRefPubMed Lobmaier, J. S., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2008). Emotional expression modulates perceived gaze direction. Emotion, 8(4), 573–577.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Luo, W., Feng, W., He, W., Wang, N.-Y., & Luo, Y.-J. (2010). Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Neuroimage, 49, 1857–1867.CrossRefPubMed Luo, W., Feng, W., He, W., Wang, N.-Y., & Luo, Y.-J. (2010). Three stages of facial expression processing: ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Neuroimage, 49, 1857–1867.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Merkt, J., Singmann, H., Bodenburg, S., Goossens-Merkt, H., Kappes, A., Wendt, M., & Gawrilow, C. (2013). Flanker performance in female college students with ADHD: a diffusion model analysis. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 5(4), 321–341.CrossRefPubMed Merkt, J., Singmann, H., Bodenburg, S., Goossens-Merkt, H., Kappes, A., Wendt, M., & Gawrilow, C. (2013). Flanker performance in female college students with ADHD: a diffusion model analysis. ADHD Attention Deficit and Hyperactivity Disorders, 5(4), 321–341.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Moser, J. S., Huppert, J. D., Duval, E., & Simons, R. F. (2008). Face processing biases in social anxiety: an electrophysiological study. Biological Psychology, 78, 93–103.CrossRefPubMed Moser, J. S., Huppert, J. D., Duval, E., & Simons, R. F. (2008). Face processing biases in social anxiety: an electrophysiological study. Biological Psychology, 78, 93–103.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Munro, G. E. S., Dywan, J., Harris, G. T., McKee, S., Unsal, A., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2007). ERN varies with degree of psychopathy in an emotion discrimination task. Biological Psychology, 76, 31–42.CrossRefPubMed Munro, G. E. S., Dywan, J., Harris, G. T., McKee, S., Unsal, A., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2007). ERN varies with degree of psychopathy in an emotion discrimination task. Biological Psychology, 76, 31–42.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Pe, M. L., Vandekerckhove, J., & Kuppens, P. (2013). A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression. Emotion, 13(1), 1–9.CrossRef Pe, M. L., Vandekerckhove, J., & Kuppens, P. (2013). A diffusion model account of the relationship between the emotional flanker task and rumination and depression. Emotion, 13(1), 1–9.CrossRef
go back to reference Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.CrossRef Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.CrossRef
go back to reference Servant, M., Montagnini, A., & Burle, B. (2014). Conflict tasks and the diffusion framework: insight in model constraints based on psychological laws. Cognitive Psychology, 72, 162–195.CrossRefPubMed Servant, M., Montagnini, A., & Burle, B. (2014). Conflict tasks and the diffusion framework: insight in model constraints based on psychological laws. Cognitive Psychology, 72, 162–195.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174.CrossRefPubMed Ulrich, R., Schröter, H., Leuthold, H., & Birngruber, T. (2015). Automatic and controlled stimulus processing in conflict tasks: superimposed diffusion processes and delta functions. Cognitive Psychology, 78, 148–174.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1011–1026.CrossRefPubMed Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2007). Fitting the Ratcliff diffusion model to experimental data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 14(6), 1011–1026.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 61–72.CrossRefPubMed Vandekerckhove, J., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2008). Diffusion model analysis with MATLAB: a DMAT primer. Behavior Research Methods, 40(1), 61–72.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology a practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 1–18. Voss, A., Nagler, M., & Lerche, V. (2013). Diffusion models in experimental psychology a practical introduction. Experimental Psychology, 1–18.
go back to reference Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(1), 192–196.CrossRefPubMed Wagenmakers, E.-J., & Farrell, S. (2004). AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11(1), 192–196.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 210–238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 210–238.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
go back to reference White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M., & McKoon, G. (2008). Dysphoria and memory of emotional material: a diffusion-model analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 181–205.CrossRef White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., Vasey, M., & McKoon, G. (2008). Dysphoria and memory of emotional material: a diffusion-model analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 23(1), 181–205.CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou, P., Yang, G., Nan, W., & Liu, X. (2015). The time course of attentional modulation on emotional conflict processing. Cognition and Emotion, 1–17. Zhou, P., Yang, G., Nan, W., & Liu, X. (2015). The time course of attentional modulation on emotional conflict processing. Cognition and Emotion, 1–17.
Metagegevens
Titel
Processing of face identity in the affective flanker task: a diffusion model analysis
Auteurs
Christina J. Mueller
Lars Kuchinke
Publicatiedatum
08-08-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 6/2016
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0696-3

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2016

Psychological Research 6/2016 Naar de uitgave