Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The present study aimed at investigating the underlying cognitive processes and language specificities of three-digit number processing. More specifically, it was intended to clarify whether the single digits of three-digit numbers are processed in parallel and/or sequentially and whether processing strategies are influenced by the inversion of number words with respect to the Arabic digits [e.g., 43: dreiundvierzig (“three and forty”)] and/or by differences in reading behavior of the respective first language. Therefore, English- and German-speaking adults had to complete a three-digit number comparison task while their eye-fixation behavior was recorded. Replicating previous results, reliable hundred-decade-compatibility effects (e.g., 742_896: hundred-decade compatible because 7 < 8 and 4 < 9; 362_517: hundred-decade incompatible because 3 < 5 but 6 > 1) for English- as well as hundred-unit-compatibility effects for English- and German-speaking participants were observed, indicating parallel processing strategies. While no indices of partial sequential processing were found for the English-speaking group, about half of the German-speaking participants showed an inverse hundred-decade-compatibility effect accompanied by longer inspection time on the hundred digit indicating additional sequential processes. Thereby, the present data revealed that in transition from two- to higher multi-digit numbers, the homogeneity of underlying processing strategies varies between language groups. The regular German orthography (allowing for letter-by-letter reading) and its associated more sequential reading behavior may have promoted sequential processing strategies in multi-digit number processing. Furthermore, these results indicated that the inversion of number words alone is not sufficient to explain all observed language differences in three-digit number processing.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Brysbaert, M. (1995). Arabic number reading: on the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(4), 434. CrossRef
Dehaene, S., Dupoux, E., & Mehler, J. (1990). Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 16(3), 626–641. PubMed
Frith, U., Wimmer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Differences in phonological recoding in German- and English-speaking children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 31–54. CrossRef
Helmreich, I., Zuber, J., Pixner, S., Kaufmann, L., Nürk, H. C., & Möller, K. (2011). Language effects on children’s nonverbal number line estimations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(4), 598–613. CrossRef
Hinrichs, J. V., Yurko, D. S., & Hu, J. M. (1981). Two-digit number comparison: use of place information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(4), 890.
Macizo, P., Herrera, A., Román, P., & Martín, M. C. (2011a). Proficiency in a second language influences the processing of number words. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 915–921. CrossRef
Mock, J., Huber, S., Klein, E., & Moeller, K. Insights into numerical cognition—considering eye-fixations in number processing and arithmetic. Psychological Research (in press).
Nuerk, H. C., Moeller, K., Klein, E., Willmes, K., & Fischer, M. H. (2011). Extending the mental number line. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 219(1), 3–22. CrossRef
Nuerk, H. C., Weger, U., & Willmes, K. (2002). A unit-decade compatibility effect in German number words. Current Psychology Letters: Behavior, Brain & Cognition, 7, 19–38.
Poltrock, S. E., & Schwartz, D. R. (1984). Comparative judgments of multidigit numbers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 32. CrossRef
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Scheerer-Neumann, G. (2006). Das Lesen lernen (wollen). Wie das Eintauchen in die Welt der Buchstaben gelingt (Learning to read. How immersion in the world of letters works). Grundschulunterricht, 5, 16–20.
Shaki, S., Fischer, M. H., & Petrusic, W. M. (2009). Reading habits for both words and numbers contribute to the SNARC effect. Psychological Bulletin and Review, 16, 328–331. CrossRef
Whelan, R. (2008). Effective analysis of reaction time data. The Psychological Record, 58(3), 475–482.
Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (WRAT4). Lutz: Psychological Assessment Resources.
- Processing multi-digit numbers: a translingual eye-tracking study
Silke M. Göbel
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg