Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Interference effects are largely reduced after cognitive conflicts in previous trials. This sequence-dependent interference adaptation is often seen as a consequence of strategic executive control. We sought to investigate whether sequential modulations are comparable with cue-induced strategic adjustments in spatial interference tasks. If so, reliable cues indicating the next compatibility condition should override effects caused by prior events. To this end, cues were introduced in a spatial stimulus-response compatibility task and a Simon task that either indicated the upcoming trial compatibility (rule cues) or the target position, which was not related to the S-R rule (position cues). The proportion of valid cues was either completely or predominantly valid. In both tasks cueing benefits for absolutely reliable rule cues were clearly present. Remarkably, sequential modulations were not influenced by effective rule cueing and vice versa. Even absolutely reliable information about prospective control demands did not cancel out sequence-dependent interference adaptation. In addition, the contingent negative variation—an event-related brain potential in the cue-target interval that is related to response preparation and readiness—showed additive effects of preceding compatibility and cue reliability. The present results indicate that processes underlying sequence-dependent interference adaptation differ from cue-induced strategic processes of cognitive control.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Akçay, C., & Hazeltine, E. (2007). Feature overlap and conflict monitoring: Two sources of sequential modulations. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,14, 742–748. PubMed
Beringer, J. (2001). Experimental Run Time System (ERTS), Version 3.32. Frankfurt: BeriSoft Cooperation.
Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,7(4), 356–366. CrossRef
Braver, T. S., Gray, J. R., & Burgess, G. C. (2007). Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: Dual mechanisms of cognitive control. In A. Conway, C. Jarrold, M. Kane, A. Miyake, J. Towse (Eds.), Variation of working memory. NY:Oxford University Press.
De Pisapia, N., & Braver, T. S. (2006). A model of dual control mechanisms through anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex interactions. Neurocomputing,69, 1322–1326. CrossRef
Dosenbach, N. U. F., Fair, D. A., Cohen, A. L., Schlaggar, B. L., & Peterson, S. E. (2008). A dual-networks architecture of top-down control. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience,12(3), 99–105. CrossRef
Egner, T. (2007). Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience,7(4), 380–390. CrossRef
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,121, 480–506. CrossRef
Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in the randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics,1, 69–82. CrossRef
Leuthold, H., Sommer, W., & Ulrich, R. (2004). Preparing for Action: Inferences from CNV and LRP. Journal of Psychophysiology,18, 77–88. CrossRef
Mayr, U., & Awh, E. (2008). The elusive link between conflict and conflict adaptation. Psychological Research, this issue.
Mayr, U., Awh, E., & Laurey, P. (2003). Conflict adaptation effects in the absence of executive control. Nature Neuroscience,6, 450–452. PubMed
Nieuwenhuis, S., Stins, J. F., Posthuma, D., Polderman, T. J., Boomsma, D. I., & de Geus, E. J. (2006). Accounting for sequential trial effects in the flanker task: conflict adaptation or associative priming? Memory and Cognition,34, 1260–1272.
Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2006). Stimulus conflict predicts conflict adaptation in a numerical flanker task. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,13, 1078–1084. PubMed
Notebaert, W., Gevers, W., Verbruggen, F., & Liefooghe, B. (2006). Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,13, 112–117. PubMed
Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R. R., & Davidson, B. J. (1980). Attention and the detection of signals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,109, 160–174. CrossRef
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: Data, theory, and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Roberts, A. C., Robbins, T. W., & Weiskrantz, L. (1998). The prefrontal cortex: Executive and Cognitive Functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science,238, 1657–1661. CrossRef
Stürmer, B., & Leuthold, H. (2003). Control over response priming in visuomotor processing: a lateralized event-related potential study. Experimental Brain Research,153, 35–44. CrossRef
Stürmer, B., Soetens, E., Sommer, W., Leuthold, H., & Schröter, H. (2002). Control Over Location-Based Response Activation in the Simon Task: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence. Journal of Experimental Psychology,28, 1345–1363. PubMed
Stürmer, B., Redlich, M., Irlbacher, K., & Brandt, S. (2007). Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Experimental Brain Research,183(3), 329–339. CrossRef
Wühr, P., & Ansorge, U. (2005). Exploring trial-by-trial modulations of the Simon effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A,58, 705–731.
Wühr, P., & Kunde, W. (2008). Precueing spatial S-R correspondence: is there regulation of expected response conflict? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,34(4), 838–872. CrossRef
- Precueing imminent conflict does not override sequence-dependent interference adaptation