Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-02-2025 | Research

Post-error slowing during motor sequence learning under extrinsic and intrinsic error feedback conditions

Auteurs: Hassan Ali, Alex Chatburn, Maarten A. Immink

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2025

Abstract

Post-error slowing, described as an error-corrective index of response binding during motor sequence learning, has only been demonstrated in the serial reaction time task under conditions where extrinsic error feedback is presented. The present experiment investigated whether post-error slowing is dependent on, or is influenced by, extrinsic error feedback. Thirty participants (14 females, M_age = 21.9 ± 1.8 years) completed the serial reaction time task with or without presentation of extrinsic error feedback. Post-error slowing was observed following response error whether feedback was presented or not. However, presentation of extrinsic error feedback increased post-error slowing across practice and extended the number of responses that were slowed following an error. There was no evidence of feedback effects on motor sequence learning or explicit awareness. Instead, feedback appeared to function as a performance factor that reduced response error rates relative to no feedback conditions. These findings illustrate that post-error slowing in motor sequence learning is not reliant on or a result of presentation of extrinsic error information. More specific to the serial reaction time task paradigm, the present findings demonstrate that the common practice of presenting error feedback is not necessary for investigating motor sequence learning unless the aim is to maintain low error rate. However, doing so might inflate reaction time in latter training blocks.

volgende artikel The effect of inverting decades and units on the retention of two-digit numbers in working memory: a matter of the output mode

Abrahamse, E. L., & Noordzij, M. L. (2011). Designing training programs for perceptual-motor skills: Practical implications from the serial reaction time task. European Review of Applied Psychology, 61(2), 65–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2010.12.001CrossRef

Adams, R. A., Shipp, S., & Friston, K. J. (2013). Predictions not commands: Active inference in the motor system. Brain Structure and Function, 218(3), 611–643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-012-0475-5CrossRefPubMed

Adkins, T. J., Zhang, H., & Lee, T. G. (2024). People are more error-prone after committing an error. Nature Communications, 15(1), 6422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-50547-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Austin, P. C., & Hux, J. E. (2002). A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 36(1), 194–195. https://doi.org/10.1067/mva.2002.125015CrossRefPubMed

Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

Beaulieu, C., Bourassa, M. È., Brisson, B., Jolicoeur, P., & De Beaumont, L. (2014). Electrophysiological correlates of motor sequence learning. BMC Neuroscience, 15, 102. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2202-15-102CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bilodeau, E. A., Bilodeau, I., Mcd, & Schumsky, D. A. (1959). Some effects of introducing and withdrawing knowledge of results early and late in practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(2), 142–144. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040262CrossRefPubMed

Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624CrossRefPubMed

Brown, J. O., Chatburn, A., Wright, D. L., & Immink, M. A. (2023). A single Session of Mindfulness Meditation expedites Immediate Motor Memory consolidation to improve Wakeful Offline Learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2022-0016

Bugnon, M., Wälchli, M., & Taube, W. (2023). How to benefit from augmented feedback? The influence of motivational and informational content of augmented feedback and the influence of task complexity. European Journal of Sport Science, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2023.2178975

Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998). Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. Science, 280(5364), 747–749. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.280.5364.747CrossRefPubMed

Chan, R. W., Immink, M. A., & Lushington, K. (2017). The influence of focused-attention meditation states on the cognitive control of sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 55, 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.07.004CrossRefPubMed

Chan, R. W., Lushington, K., & Immink, M. A. (2018). States of focused attention and sequential action: A comparison of single session meditation and computerised attention task influences on top-down control during sequence learning. Acta Psychologica, 191, 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.003CrossRefPubMed

Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01232-7CrossRefPubMed

R Core Team (2022). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/

Danielmeier, C., & Ullsperger, M. (2011). Post-error adjustments. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 233. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00233CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Dominey, P. F., Ventre-Dominey, J., Broussolle, E., & Jeannerod, M. (1997). Analogical transfer is effective in a serial reaction time task in Parkinson’s disease: Evidence for a dissociable form of sequence learning. Neuropsychologia, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00050-4CrossRefPubMed

Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415569569CrossRef

Drugowitsch, J., DeAngelis, G. C., Angelaki, D. E., & Pouget, A. (2015). Tuning the speed-accuracy trade-off to maximize reward rate in multisensory decision-making. eLife, 4, e06678. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06678CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Du, Y., & Clark, J. E. (2018). The ‘motor’ in implicit motor sequence learning: A foot-stepping serial reaction time task. Journal of Visualized Experiments, 135, 56483. https://doi.org/10.3791/56483CrossRef

Dumel, G., Bourassa, M. E., Desjardins, M., Voarino, N., Charlebois-Plante, C., Doyon, J., & De Beaumont, L. (2016). Multisession Anodal tDCS Protocol Improves Motor System Function in an Aging Population. Neural Plasticity, 2016, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5961362

Fabio, R. A., Caprì, T., & Romano, M. (2019). From controlled to automatic processes and back again: The role of Contextual features. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 15(4), 773–788. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v15i4.1746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fitts, P. M. (1966). Cognitive aspects of information processing: III. Set for speed versus accuracy. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 849–857. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023232CrossRefPubMed

Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.

Forbes, S. (2020). PupillometryR: An R package for preparing and analysing pupillometry data. Journal of Open Source Software, 5(50), 2285. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02285CrossRef

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). Visualizing fit and lack of fit in Complex Regression models with Predictor Effect plots and partial residuals. Journal of Statistical Software, 87(9). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v087.i09

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R Companion to Applied Regression (Third Edition) [R]. Sage. https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion/

Frensch, P. A., & Runger, D. (2003). Implicit learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 13–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.01213CrossRef

Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005CrossRefPubMed

Friston, K., Parr, T., & De Vries, B. (2017). The graphical brain: Belief propagation and active inference. Network Neuroscience, 1(4), 381–414. https://doi.org/10.1162/NETN_a_00018CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ghilardi, M. F., Moisello, C., Silvestri, G., Ghez, C., & Krakauer, J. W. (2009). Learning of a Sequential Motor Skill comprises Explicit and Implicit Components that consolidate differently. Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(5), 2218–2229. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01138.2007CrossRefPubMed

Goldfarb, S., Wong-Lin, K., Schwemmer, M., Leonard, N. E., & Holmes, P. (2012). Can post-error dynamics explain sequential reaction time patterns? Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00213CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of Gain of Information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215208416600CrossRef

Hoffing, R. C., Karvelis, P., Rupprechter, S., Seriès, P., & Seitz, A. R. (2018). The influence of feedback on Task-switching performance: A drift diffusion modeling account. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 12, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2018.00001CrossRef

Hoffmann, S., & Falkenstein, M. (2012). Predictive information processing in the brain: Errors and response monitoring. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.11.015CrossRefPubMed

Immink, M. A., & Corcoran, A. W. (2023). Action imagery as active inference: A commentary on Rieger et al. (2023). Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01900-1CrossRefPubMed

Immink, M. A., Verwey, W. B., & Wright, D. L. (2020). The neural basis of cognitive efficiency in motor skill performance from early learning to automatic stages. In Neuroergonomics (pp. 221–249). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34784-0_12

Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028CrossRefPubMed

Kleynen, M., Braun, S. M., Bleijlevens, M. H., Lexis, M. A., Rasquin, S. M., Halfens, J., Wilson, M. R., Beurskens, A. J., & Masters, R. S. W. (2014). Using a Delphi Technique to seek Consensus regarding definitions, descriptions and classification of terms related to Implicit and Explicit forms of Motor Learning. Plos One, 9(6), e100227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100227CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2000). Patterns, chunks, and hierarchies in serial reaction-time tasks. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 63(1), 22–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008165CrossRefPubMed

Krause, D., Agethen, M., & Zobe, C. (2018). Error feedback frequency affects automaticity but not accuracy and consistency after extensive motor skill practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1327406CrossRefPubMed

Laming, D. (1968). Information theory of choice-reaction times. Academic.

Laming, D. (1979a). Autocorrelation of choice-reaction times. Acta Psychologica, 43(5), 381–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(79)90032-5CrossRefPubMed

Laming, D. (1979b). Choice reaction performance following an error. Acta Psychologica, 43(3), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(79)90026-XCrossRef

Lenth, R. (2023). _emmeans: Estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means_ (R package version 1.8.4-1) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans

Li, T., Wang, D., Peng, C., Yu, C., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Speed-accuracy tradeoff of fingertip force control with visual/audio/haptic feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 110, 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.10.004CrossRef

Lo, C. C., Wang, C. T., & Wang, X. J. (2015). Speed-accuracy tradeoff by a control signal with balanced excitation and inhibition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(1), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00845.2013CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Lüdecke, D. (2018). Ggeffects: Tidy data frames of marginal effects from Regression models. Journal of Open Source Software, 3(26), 772. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.00772CrossRef

MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control. Science, 288(5472), 1835–1838. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.288.5472.1835CrossRefPubMed

MacGregor-Fors, I., & Payton, M. E. (2013). Contrasting diversity values: Statistical inferences based on overlapping confidence intervals. Plos One, 8(2), e56794. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0056794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

MacMahon, K. M. A., & Masters, R. S. W. (1999). From novice to expert and back again: Chunking and dechunking in motor skills. Journal of Sports Sciences, 17(7), 606–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/026404199365722CrossRef

Masters, R. S. W. (1992). Knowledge knerves and know-how: The role of explicit versus implicit knowledge in the breakdown of a complex motor skill under pressure. British Journal of Psychology, 83, 343358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1992.tb02446.xCrossRef

Masters, R. S., & Maxwell, J. (2008). The theory of reinvestment. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1(2), 160–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/17509840802287218CrossRef

Masters, R. S., Polman, R. C. J., & Hammond, N. V. (1993). Reinvestment’: A dimension of personality implicated in skill breakdown under pressure. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(5), 655–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90113-HCrossRef

Maudrich, T., Kenville, R., Schempp, C., Noack, E., & Ragert, P. (2021). Comparison of whole-body sensorimotor skill learning between strength athletes, endurance athletes and healthy sedentary adults. Heliyon, 7(8), e07723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07723CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

McKay, B., Hussien, J., Vinh, M. A., Mir-Orefice, A., Brooks, H., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2022). Meta-analysis of the reduced relative feedback frequency effect on motor learning and performance. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 61, 102165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2022.102165CrossRef

Moisello, C., Crupi, D., Tunik, E., Quartarone, A., Bove, M., Tononi, G., & Ghilardi, M. F. (2009). The serial reaction time task revisited: A study on motor sequence learning with an arm-reaching task. Experimental Brain Research, 194(1), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-008-1681-5CrossRefPubMed

Musculus, L., Kinrade, N., Laborde, S., Gleißert, M., Streich, M., & Lobinger, B. H. (2021). Movement-Specific Reinvestment in Older people explains Past Falls and predicts future error-prone movements. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5129. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105129CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Neuwirth, E. (2022). _RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer Palettes_ (R Package Version 1.1-3) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer

Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1987). Attentional requirements of learning: Evidence from performance measures. Cognitive Psychology, 19(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(87)90002-8CrossRef

Notebaert, W., Houtman, F., Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Fias, W., & Verguts, T. (2009). Post-error slowing: An orienting account. Cognition, 111(2), 275–279.CrossRefPubMed

Pachella, R. G., & Pew, R. W. (1968). Speed-accuracy tradeoff in reaction time: Effect of Discrete Criterion Times. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76(1), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021275CrossRef

Panzer, S., Wilde, H., & Shea, C. H. (2006). Learning of similar complex movement sequences: Proactive and retroactive effects on learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 38(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.38.1.60-70CrossRefPubMed

Parr, T., Pezzulo, G., & Friston, K. J. (2022). Active inference: The free energy principle in mind, brain, and behavior. MIT Press.

Psychology Software Tools (2021). E-Prime (Version 3.0) [Computer software]. Psychology Software Tools. https://pstnet.com/products/e-prime/

Purcell, B. A., & Kiani, R. (2016). Neural mechanisms of post-error adjustments of decision policy in parietal cortex. Neuron, 89(3), 658–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.12.027CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Rabbitt, P. M. (1966). Errors and error correction in choice-response tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(2), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022853CrossRefPubMed

Rabbitt, P., & Rodgers, B. (1977). What does a man do after he makes an error? An analysis of response programming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29(4), 727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640747708400645CrossRef

Reed, J., & Johnson, P. (1994). Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: Determining what is learned about sequence structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 20(3), 585–594. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.3.585CrossRef

Robertson, E. (2007). The serial reaction Time Task: Implicit motor skill learning? Journal of Neuroscience, 27(38), 10073–10075. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2747-07.2007CrossRefPubMed

Robertson, E., & Takács, Á. (2018). Motor sequence learning. Scholarpedia, 13(5), 12319. https://doi.org/10.4249/scholarpedia.12319CrossRef

Rüsseler, J., Kuhlicke, D., & Münte, T. F. (2003). Human error monitoring during implicit and explicit learning of a sensorimotor sequence. Neuroscience Research, 47(2), 233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-0102(03)00212-8CrossRefPubMed

Rüsseler, J., Münte, T. F., & Wiswede, D. (2018). On the influence of informational content and key-response effect mapping on implicit learning and error monitoring in the serial reaction time (SRT) task. Experimental Brain Research, 236, 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-017-5124-zCrossRefPubMed

Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355CrossRefPubMed

Schielzeth, H., Dingemanse, N. J., Nakagawa, S., Westneat, D. F., Allegue, H., Teplitsky, C., Réale, D., Dochtermann, N. A., Garamszegi, L. Z., & Araya-Ajoy, Y. G. (2020). Robustness of linear mixed‐effects models to violations of distributional assumptions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(9), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.13434CrossRef

Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2019). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (6 ed.). Human Kinetics.

Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. (2012). Generalized lessons about sequence learning from the study of the serial reaction time task. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 8(2), 165–178. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0113-1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Sigrist, R., Rauter, G., Riener, R., & Wolf, P. (2013). Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 21–53. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0333-8CrossRef

Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015). Learning versus performance: An integrative review. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(2), 176–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615569000CrossRefPubMed

Tenison, C., & Anderson, J. R. (2016). Modeling the distinct phases of skill acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 42(5), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000204CrossRefPubMed

van Steenbergen, H. (2015). Affective modulation of cognitive control: A biobehavioral perspective. In G. Gendolla, M. Tops, & S. Koole (Eds.), Handbook of biobehavioral approaches to self-regulation (pp. 89–107). Springer.

Veale, J. F. (2014). Edinburgh handedness inventory–short form: A revised version based on confirmatory factor analysis. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition, 19(2), 164–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1357650x.2013.783045CrossRef

Verneau, M., van der Kamp, J., Savelsbergh, G. J., & de Looze, M. P. (2015). Proactive and retroactive transfer of middle age adults in a sequential motor learning task. Acta Psychologica, 156, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.01.009CrossRefPubMed

Verstynen, T., Phillips, J., Braun, E., Workman, B., Schunn, C., & Schneider, W. (2012). Dynamic sensorimotor planning during long-term sequence learning: The role of variability, response chunking and planning errors. PLOS ONE, 7(10), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0047336CrossRef

Verwey, W. B. (2023). C-SMB 2.0: Integrating over 25 years of motor sequencing research with the discrete sequence production task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-023-02377-0

Verwey, W. B., Shea, C. H., & Wright, D. L. (2015). A cognitive framework for explaining serial processing and sequence execution strategies. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 54–77. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0773-4CrossRef

Vidal, F., Burle, B., & Hasbroucq, T. (2020). Errors and action monitoring: Errare Humanum Est Sed Corrigere Possibile. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00453CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Vidoni, E. D., & Boyd, L. A. (2008). Motor sequence learning occurs despite disrupted visual and proprioceptive feedback. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 4(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-4-32CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Wälchli, M., Ruffieux, J., Bourquin, Y., Keller, M., & Taube, W. (2016). Maximizing performance: Augmented feedback, Focus of Attention, and/or reward? Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 48(4), 714–719. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000000818CrossRef

Wessel, J. R. (2018). An adaptive orienting theory of error processing. Psychophysiology, 55(3), e13041. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13041CrossRef

Whitaker, H. A. (1983). Towards A Brain Model of Automatization: A Short Essay. In Advances in Psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 199–214). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61992-5

Wickelgren, W. A. (1977). Speed-accuracy tradeoff and information processing dynamics. Acta Psychologica, 41(1), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(77)90012-9CrossRef

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd ed.). Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-24277-4

Wickham, H., Vaughan, M., & Girlich, M. (2023). _tidyr: Tidy Messy Data__ (R Package Version 1.3.0) [R]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tidyr

Wickham, H., François, R., Henry, L., Müller, K., & Vaughan, D. (2023a). _dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation_ (R Package Version 1.1.0) [R]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr

Winstein, C. J., & Schmidt, R. A. (1990). Reduced frequency of knowledge of results enhances motor skill learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 16(4), 677–691. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.16.4.677CrossRef

Wong, A. L., Lindquist, M. A., Haith, A. M., & Krakauer, J. W. (2015). Explicit knowledge enhances motor vigor and performance: Motivation versus practice in sequence tasks. Journal of Neurophysiology, 114(1), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00218.2015CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yeung, N., & Summerfield, C. (2012). Metacognition in human decision-making: Confidence and error monitoring. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1594), 1310–1321. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0416CrossRef

Zubarev, I., & Parkkonen, L. (2018). Evidence for a general performance-monitoring system in the human brain. Human Brain Mapping, 39(11), 4322–4333. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Titel: Post-error slowing during motor sequence learning under extrinsic and intrinsic error feedback conditions
Auteurs: Hassan Ali
Alex Chatburn
Maarten A. Immink
Publicatiedatum: 01-02-2025
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2025
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-024-02037-5

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2025

The salience of an agency experience influences its ability to improve memory

Research

Different effects of smooth pursuit eye movements on motion-based stimulus response congruency

Research

Input device matters for measures of behaviour in online experiments

Open Access
Research

Naturalistic multimodal emotion data with deep learning can advance the theoretical understanding of emotion

Open Access
Review

Linguistic markedness and body specificity in parity judgments: evidence from a go/no-go task

Research

A longitudinal study of math skills in heritage bilingual children: profiles of strengths and weaknesses

Research