Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2018

13-10-2017

Positive and Negative Peer Influence in Residential Care

Auteurs: Jonathan C. Huefner, Gail L. Smith, Amy L. Stevens

Gepubliceerd in: Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology | Uitgave 6/2018

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

The potential for negative peer influence has been well established in research, and there is a growing interest in how positive peer influence also impacts youth. No research, however, has concurrently examined positive and negative peer influence in the context of residential care. Clinical records for 886 residential care youth were used in a Hierarchical Linear Model analysis to examine the impact of negative and positive peer influence on naturally occurring patterns of serious problem behavior over time. Negative peer influence, where the majority of youth in a home manifested above the average number of serious behavior problems, occurred 13.7% of the time. Positive peer influence, where the majority of youth manifested no serious problem behaviors for the month, occurred 47.7% of the time. Overall, youth problem behavior improved over time. There were significantly lower rates of serious problem behavior in target youth during positive peer influence months. Conversely, there were significantly higher rates of serious problem behaviors in target youth during negative peer influence months. Negative peer influence had a relatively greater impact on target peers’ serious behavior problems than did positive peer influence. Caregiver experience significantly reduced the impact of negative peer influence, but did not significantly augment positive peer influence. Months where negative peer influence was combined with inexperienced caregivers produced the highest rates of serious problem behavior. Our results support the view that residential programs for troubled youth need to create circumstances that promote positive and control for negative peer influence.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer infuence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185–198.CrossRefPubMed Bauman, K. E., & Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer infuence for adolescent drug use: commonly neglected considerations. Addiction, 91, 185–198.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Benda, B. B. (2001). Factors that discriminate between recidivists, parole violators, and nonrecidivists in a 3-year follow-up of boot camp graduates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 711–729.CrossRef Benda, B. B. (2001). Factors that discriminate between recidivists, parole violators, and nonrecidivists in a 3-year follow-up of boot camp graduates. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 45, 711–729.CrossRef
go back to reference Benda, B. B., Toombs, N. J., & Peacock, M. (2002). Ecological factors in recidivism: a survival analysis of boot camp graduates after three years. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35, 63–85.CrossRef Benda, B. B., Toombs, N. J., & Peacock, M. (2002). Ecological factors in recidivism: a survival analysis of boot camp graduates after three years. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 35, 63–85.CrossRef
go back to reference Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1987). Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 97–109. Chamberlain, P., & Reid, J. B. (1987). Parent observation and report of child symptoms. Behavioral Assessment, 9, 97–109.
go back to reference Dishion, T. J., Dodge, K. A., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Findings and recommendations: a blueprint to minimize deviant peer influence in youth interventions and programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 366–394). New York: Guilford Press. Dishion, T. J., Dodge, K. A., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Findings and recommendations: a blueprint to minimize deviant peer influence in youth interventions and programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 366–394). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Dodge, K. A., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Deviant peer group effects in youth mental health interventions. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 97–121). New York: Guilford Press. Dodge, K. A., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Deviant peer group effects in youth mental health interventions. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 97–121). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Social Policy Report, 20, 3–19. Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Deviant peer influences in intervention and public policy for youth. Social Policy Report, 20, 3–19.
go back to reference Dozier, M., Kaufman, J., Kobak, R., O'Connor, T. G., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Scott, S., et al. (2014). Consensus statement on group care for children and adolescents: a statement of policy of the American Orthopsychiatric Association. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000005.CrossRefPubMed Dozier, M., Kaufman, J., Kobak, R., O'Connor, T. G., Sagi-Schwartz, A., Scott, S., et al. (2014). Consensus statement on group care for children and adolescents: a statement of policy of the American Orthopsychiatric Association. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 84, 219–225. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1037/​ort0000005.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: how do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.CrossRef Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: how do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.CrossRef
go back to reference Jewell, J., Handwerk, M., Almquist, J., & Lucas, C. (2004). Comparing the validity of clinician-generated diagnosis of conduct disorder to the diagnostic interview schedule for children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 536–546.CrossRefPubMed Jewell, J., Handwerk, M., Almquist, J., & Lucas, C. (2004). Comparing the validity of clinician-generated diagnosis of conduct disorder to the diagnostic interview schedule for children. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 536–546.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Larzelere, R. E. (1996). Inter-coder reliabilities and construct groupings for some important codes on the daily incident report (tech. Report no. 004–96). Boys Town: Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Larzelere, R. E. (1996). Inter-coder reliabilities and construct groupings for some important codes on the daily incident report (tech. Report no. 004–96). Boys Town: Father Flanagan's Boys' Home.
go back to reference Leve, L. D., & Chamberlain, P. (2005). Association with delinquent peers: intervention effects for youth in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 339–347.CrossRefPubMedCentral Leve, L. D., & Chamberlain, P. (2005). Association with delinquent peers: intervention effects for youth in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 339–347.CrossRefPubMedCentral
go back to reference Lochman, J. E., Dishion, T. J., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., & Qu, L. (2017). Variation in response to evidence-based group preventive intervention for disruptive behavior problems: a view from 938 coping power sessions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 45, 1271–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-016-0252-7. Lochman, J. E., Dishion, T. J., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., & Qu, L. (2017). Variation in response to evidence-based group preventive intervention for disruptive behavior problems: a view from 938 coping power sessions. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 45, 1271–1284. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1007/​s10802-016-0252-7.
go back to reference Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillesen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74.CrossRef Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M. J., & Cillesen, A. H. N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74.CrossRef
go back to reference McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166.CrossRefPubMed McArdle, J. J., & Hamagami, F. (1992). Modeling incomplete longitudinal and cross-sectional data using latent growth structural models. Experimental Aging Research, 18, 145–166.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference McCord, J. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist, 33, 284–289.CrossRefPubMed McCord, J. (1978). A thirty-year follow-up of treatment effects. American Psychologist, 33, 284–289.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2006). Peer effects in juvenile justice. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 141–161). New York: Guilford Press. Osgood, D. W., & Briddell, L. (2006). Peer effects in juvenile justice. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: problems and solutions (pp. 141–161). New York: Guilford Press.
go back to reference Popp, D., Laursen, B., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. K. (2008). Modeling homophily over time with an actor-partner interdependence model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1028–1039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Popp, D., Laursen, B., Kerr, M., Stattin, H., & Burk, W. K. (2008). Modeling homophily over time with an actor-partner interdependence model. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1028–1039.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metagegevens
Titel
Positive and Negative Peer Influence in Residential Care
Auteurs
Jonathan C. Huefner
Gail L. Smith
Amy L. Stevens
Publicatiedatum
13-10-2017
Uitgeverij
Springer US
Gepubliceerd in
Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology / Uitgave 6/2018
Print ISSN: 2730-7166
Elektronisch ISSN: 2730-7174
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-017-0353-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2018

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 6/2018 Naar de uitgave