Top

Quality of Life Research

Gepubliceerd in:

01-08-2014

Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision

Auteurs: Jolanta Zycinska, Ewa Gruszczynska, Alina Choteborska

Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research | Uitgave 6/2014

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to explore the role of positive and negative aspects of well-being in a breast reconstruction decision, described in terms of the transtheoretical model of change (TTM).

Methods

The study comprised 216 women after total mastectomy in the cross-sectional design. The positive aspects of well-being were measured using the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and Generalised Self-Efficacy Scale; the negative aspects were assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory and State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (T-Anxiety scale).

Results

The multinomial logistic regression analyses were implemented, and the action stage was chosen as a relevant category. McFadden’s pseudo R-squared for positive, negative and combined aspects of well-being models equalled 0.28, 0.13 and 0.27, respectively. For the first model, the differential effects were observed for well-being, age and relationship status (54 % correctly classified cases), whereas for the model with negative aspects—only age and well-being (44 % correctly classified cases). For a model combining two aspects of well-being, the pattern was similar to the one observed for positive well-being (53 % correctly classified cases). The likelihood of classifying women in the action stage rather than in the precontemplation stage was determined by three variables: being in a relationship, better well-being and younger age. For the contemplation stage, the same relations were obtained for well-being and age. Finally, for the preparation stage, the well-being effect disappeared.

Conclusion

The results suggest that positive rather than negative aspects of well-being, after control for sociodemographic variables, may be significant correlates of breast reconstruction decision.

vorige artikel Reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the QAPACE in adolescents

volgende artikel Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and Germany

General self-efficacy is conceptualised as a global confidence in one’s coping ability across a wide range of stressful or novel situations [26].

This study does not cover this TTM stage because of the research aim concerning making a breast reconstruction decision (not the consequences of such a decision).

Death and DALY estimates for 2004 by cause for countries: Females, all ages. (2009). Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at: http://apps.who.int/gho/data/?theme=main&node=1011#. Accessed 31/12/2012.

Aebi, S., Davidson, T., Gruber, G., & Cordoso, F. (2001). Primary breast cancer: ESMO clinical guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals of Oncology, 22(6), vi12–vi24. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdr371.

Siegel, R., DeSantis, C., Virgo, K., et al. (2012). Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 62(4), 220–241. doi:10.3322/caac.21149.

Chen, J. Y., Malin, J., Ganz, P. A., et al. (2008). Variation in physician-patient discussion of breast reconstruction. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 99–194. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0855-y.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

Keith, D. J., Walker, M. B., Walker, L. G., Heys, S. D., Sarkar, T. K., Hutcheon, A. W., et al. (2003). Women who wish breast reconstruction: Characteristics, fears, and hopes. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(3), 1051–1059. doi:10.1097/01.PRS.0000046247.56810.40.PubMedCrossRef

Harcourt, D., & Rumsey, N. (2001). Psychological aspects of breast reconstruction: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 35(4), 477–487. doi:10.1002/pon.711.PubMedCrossRef

Fallbjörk, U., Karlsson, S., Salander, P., & Rasmussen, B. H. (2010). Differences between women who have and have not undergone breast reconstruction after mastectomy due breast cancer. Acta Oncologica, 49(2), 174–179.PubMedCrossRef

Girotto, J. A., Schreiber, J., & Nahabedian, M. Y. (2003). Breast reconstruction in the elderly: Preserving excellent quality of life. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 50(6), 572–578.PubMedCrossRef

Lim, G., Low, S. C., & Hoe, M. (2001). Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A survey of general surgeons in Singapore. ANZ Journal of Surgery, 71, 207–211.PubMedCrossRef

10.

Maly, R. C., Liu, Y., Kwong, E., Thind, A., & Diamant, A. L. (2009). Breast reconstructive surgery in medically underserved women with breast cancer: The role of patient-physician communication. Cancer, 115(20), 4819–4827.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

11.

McDowell, I. (2010). Measures of self-perceived well-being. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 69(1), 69–79. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.07.002.PubMedCrossRef

12.

Diener, E., & Chan, M. Y. (2011). Happy people live longer: Subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 1–43. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x.

13.

Huppert, F. A., & Whittington, J. E. (2003). Evidence for the independence of positive and negative well-being: Implications for quality of life assessment. British Journal of Health Psychology, 8(1), 107–122. doi:10.1348/135910703762879246.PubMedCrossRef

14.

Howell, R. T., Kern, M. L., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2007). Health benefits: Meta-analytically determining the impact of well-being on objective health outcomes. Health Psychology Review, 1, 83–136. doi:10.1080/17437190701492486.CrossRef

15.

Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2005). Does positive affect influence health? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 925–971. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.925.PubMedCrossRef

16.

Fobair, P., Stewart, S. L., Chang, S., D’Onofrio, C., Banks, P. J., & Bloom, J. R. (2006). Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 15, 579–594. doi:10.1002/pon.991.PubMedCrossRef

17.

Nicholson, R. M., Leinster, S., & Sassoon, E. M. (2007). A comparison of the cosmetic and psychological outcome of breast reconstruction, breast conserving surgery and mastectomy without reconstruction. Breast, 16, 396–410.PubMedCrossRef

18.

Sertoz, O. O., Doganavsargil, O., & Elbi, H. (2009). Body image and self-esteem in somatizing patients. Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 63, 508–515. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2009.01994.x.PubMedCrossRef

19.

Wojtyna, E., Zycinska, J., & Stawiarska, P. (2007). The influence of cognitive-behavior therapy on quality of life and self-esteem in women suffering from breast cancer. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 2, 109–117. doi:10.1016/S1507-1367(10)60047-8.CrossRef

20.

Tykkä, E., Asko-Seljavaara, S., & Hietanen, H. (2001). Patients’ satisfaction with breast reconstruction and reduction mammaplasty. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery, 35, 399–405.PubMedCrossRef

21.

Noyan, M. A., Sertoz, O. O., Elbi, H., Kayar, R., & Yilmaz, R. (2006). Variables affecting patient satisfaction in breast surgery: A cross-sectional sample of Turkish women with breast cancer. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 36(3), 299–313.PubMedCrossRef

22.

Veiga, D. F., Veiga-Filho, J., Ribeiro, L. M., Archangelo, I., Jr, Balbino, P. F., Caetano, L. V., et al. (2010). Quality-of-life and self-esteem outcomes after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(3), 811–817.PubMedCrossRef

23.

Tykkä, E., Asko-Seljavaara, S., & Hietanen, H. (2002). Patient satisfaction with delayed breast reconstruction: A prospective study. Annals of Plastic Surgery, 49(3), 258–263.PubMedCrossRef

24.

Luszczynska, A., Gutiérrez-Doňa, B., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). General self-efficacy in various domains of human functioning: Evidence from five countries. International Journal of Psychology, 40, 80–89. doi:10.1080/00207590444000041.CrossRef

25.

Lam, W. W. T., & Fielding, R. (2007). Is self-efficacy a predictor of short-term post-surgical adjustment among Chinese women with breast cancer? Psycho-Oncology, 16, 651–659. doi:10.1002/pon.877.PubMedCrossRef

26.

Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self-beliefs: Comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 46(1), 69–88.CrossRef

27.

Nápoles, A. M., Ortíz, C., O’Brien, H., Sereno, A. B., & Kaplan, C. P. (2011). Coping resources and self-rated health among Latina breast cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum, 38(5), 523–531. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.523-531.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

28.

Adachi, K., Ueno, T., Fujioka, T., Fujitomi, Y., & Ueo, H. (2007). Psychosocial factors affecting the therapeutic decision-making and postoperative mood states in Japanese breast cancer patients who underwent various types of surgery: Body image and sexuality. Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37(6), 412–418. doi:10.1093/jjco/hym041.PubMedCrossRef

29.

Fernández-Delgado, J., López-Pedraza, M. J., Blasco, J. A., Andradas-Aragones, E., Sánchez-Méndez, J. I., Sordo-Miralles, G., et al. (2008). Satisfaction with and psychological impact of immediate and deferred breast reconstruction. Annals of Oncology, 19(8), 1430–1434.PubMedCrossRef

30.

Parker, P. A., Youssef, A., Walker, S., Basen-Engquist, K., Cohen, L., Gritz, E. R., et al. (2007). Short-term and long-term psychosocial adjustment and quality of life in women undergoing different surgical procedures for breast cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology, 14(11), 3078–3089.PubMedCrossRef

31.

Rubino, C., Figus, A., Lorettu, L., & Sechi, G. (2007). Post-mastectomy reconstruction: A comparative analysis on psychosocial and psychopathological outcomes. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery: JPRAS, 60(5), 509–518.PubMedCrossRef

32.

Roth, R. S., Lowery, J. C., Davis, J., & Wilkins, E. G. (2007). Psychological factors predict patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 119(7), 2008–2017.PubMedCrossRef

33.

Sheehan, J., Sherman, K. A., Lam, T., & Boyages, J. (2007). Association of information satisfaction, psychological distress and monitoring coping style with post-decision regret following breast reconstruction. Psycho-Oncology, 16, 342–351. doi:10.1002/pon.1067.PubMedCrossRef

34.

Montebarocci, O., Lo Dato, F., Baldaro, B., Morselli, P., & Rossi, N. C. (2007). Anxiety and body satisfaction before and six months after mastectomy and breast reconstruction surgery. Psychological Reports, 101(1), 100–106.PubMedCrossRef

35.

Levesque, D. A., Cummins, C. O., Prochaska, J. M., & Prochaska, J. O. (2006). Stage of change for making an informed decision about medicare health plans. Health Services Research, 41(4), 1372–1391. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00547.x.PubMedCentralPubMed

36.

Rakowski, W., Dube, C. E., Marcus, B. H., Prochaska, J. O., Velicer, W. F., & Abrams, D. B. (1992). Assessing elements of women’s decisions about mammography. Health Psychology, 11(2), 111–118.PubMedCrossRef

37.

Waterman, A., Robbins, M., Paiva, A., & Hyland, S. (2010). Kidney patients’ intention to receive a deceased donor transplant: Development of stage of change, decisional balance and self-efficacy measures. Journal Of Health Psychology, 15(3), 436–445.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef

38.

Prochaska, J. (2008). Decision making in the transtheoretical model of behavior change. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of The Society For Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 845–849.CrossRef

39.

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1992). Stages of change in the modification of problem behaviors. Progress in Behavior Modification, 28, 184–218.

40.

National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2009). Early and locally advanced breast cancer: Diagnosis and treatment (CG80). Cardiff: National Collaborating Centre. Available at: http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG80/Guidance/pdf/English. Accessed 11/11/2013.

41.

Kronowitz, S. J., Hunt, K. K., Kuerer, H. M., Babiera, G., McNeese, M. D., Buchholz, T. A., et al. (2004). Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 113(6), 1617–1628.PubMedCrossRef

42.

De Vet, E., De Nooijer, J., De Vries, N., & Brug, J. (2008). Do the transtheoretical processes of change predict transitions in stages of change for fruit intake? Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of The Society for Public Health Education, 35(5), 603–618.CrossRef

43.

Kraft, P., Sutton, S. R., & Reynolds, H. M. (1999). The transtheoretical model of behaviour change: Are the stages qualitatively different? Psychology & Health, 14, 433–450.CrossRef

44.

Łaguna, M., Lachowicz-Tabaczek, K., & Dzwonkowska, I. (2007). Skala samooceny SES Morrisa Rosenberga—polska adaptacja metody [The Self-Esteem Scale SES by Morris Rosenberg—Polish adaptation of this method]. Psychologia Społeczna, 2, 164–176.

45.

Juczyński, Z. (2001). Narzędzia pomiaru w promocji i psychologii zdrowia. [Assessment tools in health promotion and health psychology]. Warsaw: Psychological Tests Laboratory, Polish Psychological Association.

46.

Parnowski, T., & Jernajczyk, W. (1977). Inwentarz Depresji Beck’a w ocenie nastroju osób zdrowych i chorych na choroby afektywne [The Beck Depression Inventory to assess mood of healthy people and patients with affective disorders]. Psychiatria Polska, 11, 417–421.PubMed

47.

Berard, R. M. F., Boermeester, F., & Viljoen, G. (1998). Depressive disorders in an out-patient oncology setting: Prevalence, assessment, and management. Psycho-Oncology, 7, 112–120.PubMedCrossRef

48.

Wrześniewski, K., Sosnowski, T., & Matusik, D. (2002). Inwentarz Stanu i Cechy Lęku: polska adaptacja STAI. Podręcznik. [State-Trait Anxiety Inventory: Polish adaptation STAI. Handbook]. Warsaw : Psychological Tests Laboratory, Polish Psychological Association.

49.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

50.

Petrucci, C. J. (2009). A primer for social worker researchers on how to conduct a multinomial logistic regression. Journal of Social Service Research, 35(2), 193–205.CrossRef

51.

Hobfoll, S. E. (1998). Stress, culture, and community. The psychology and philosophy of stress. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRef

52.

Gallo, L. C., & Matthews, K. A. (2003). Understanding the association between socioeconomic status and physical health: Do negative emotions play a role? Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 10–51.PubMedCrossRef

53.

Javo, I. M., & Sorlie, T. (2010). Psychosocial characteristics of young Norwegian women interested in liposuction, breast augmentation, rhinoplasty, and abdominoplasty: A population-based study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 125(5), 1536–1543.PubMedCrossRef

54.

Sarwer, D. B., Brown, G. K., & Evans, D. L. (2007). Cosmetic breast augmentation and suicide. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164(7), 1006–1013.PubMedCrossRef

55.

Folkman, S., & Greer, S. (2000). Promoting psychological well-being in the face of serious illness: When theory, research and practice inform each other. Psycho-Oncology, 9, 11–19. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(200001/02)9:1<11:AID-PON424>3.0.CO;2-Z.PubMedCrossRef

56.

Schroevers, M. J., Kraaij, V., & Garnefski, N. (2011). Cancer patients’ experience of positive and negative changes due to the illness: Relationships with psychological well-being, coping, and goal reengagement. Psycho-Oncology, 20, 165–172. doi:10.1002/pon.1718.PubMedCrossRef

57.

Silva, S. M., Cruz, M. H., & Canavarro, M. C. (2012). Examining the links between perceived impact of breast cancer and psychosocial adjustment: The buffering role of posttraumatic growth. Psycho-Oncology, 21, 409–418. doi:10.1002/pon.1913.PubMedCrossRef

58.

Sutton, S. (2000). Interpreting cross-sectional data on stages of change. Psychology & Health, 15, 163–171.CrossRef

59.

Alderman, A. K., McMahon, L., Jr, & Wilkins, E. G. (2003). The national utilization of immediate and early delayed breast reconstruction and the effect of sociodemographic factors. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 111(2), 695–703.PubMedCrossRef

Titel: Positive and negative aspects of well-being as correlates of breast reconstruction decision
Auteurs: Jolanta Zycinska
Ewa Gruszczynska
Alina Choteborska
Publicatiedatum: 01-08-2014
Uitgeverij: Springer International Publishing
Gepubliceerd in: Quality of Life Research / Uitgave 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0962-9343
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-2649
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0612-5

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 6/2014

Health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with celiac disease: patient-driven data from focus group interviews

Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120

Reliability and validity of the Iranian version of the QAPACE in adolescents

Development and psychometric properties of the Maastricht Personal Autonomy Questionnaire (MPAQ) in older adults with a chronic physical illness

The Italian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory: cross-cultural adaptation, factor analysis, reliability and validity

Understanding the relative importance of preserving functional abilities in Alzheimer’s disease in the United States and Germany