Top

Gepubliceerd in:

07-02-2017

Populariteit, maar niet geliefdheid, is gerelateerd aan risicogedrag van Nederlandse adolescenten

Auteurs: Nina van den Broek, MSc, Marike H. F. Deutz, MSc, Dr. Aart Franken, Prof. Dr. Antonius H. N. Cillessen

Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent | Uitgave 1/2017

Samenvatting

Ondanks dat theoretisch en empirisch bewijs aantoont dat Amerikaanse en Australische adolescenten risicogedrag vertonen om sociale status te verwerven, is er weinig bekend over de relatie tussen risicogedrag en sociale status bij Europese adolescenten. De huidige studie onderzocht deze relatie daarom bij 253 Nederlandse adolescenten (M _leeftijd = 16,83 jaar, 52 % jongens). De deelnemers beantwoordden sociometrische vragen over populariteit en geliefdheid van hun klasgenoten, en rapporteerden over hun eigen risicogedrag (het gebruik van alcohol, tabak en marihuana, alsmede het aantal seksuele partners). Structurele vergelijkingsmodellen lieten zien dat risicogedrag sterk gerelateerd was aan populariteit, maar niet aan geliefdheid. Uit deze studie blijkt dat de relatie tussen risicogedrag en sociale status in Nederland in overeenstemming is met bevindingen buiten Europa.

vorige artikel Kosteneffectiviteit van jeugdinterventies in Nederland: een systematische literatuurreview

volgende artikel Moet ouderlijk verbieden verboden worden?

Agan, M.L., Costin, A.S., Deutz, M.H.F., Edelsbrunner, P.A., Záliš, L., & Franken, A. (2015). Associations between risk behaviour and social status in European adolescents. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 12, 189–203.

Anderson, P., De Bruijn, A., Angus, K., Gordon, R., & Hastings, G. (2009). Impact of alcohol advertising and media exposure on adolescent alcohol use: a systematic review of longitudinal studies. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 44, 229–243.CrossRefPubMed

Balsa, A.I., Homer, J.F., French, M.T., & Norton, E.C. (2011). Alcohol use and popularity: social payoffs from conforming to peers’ behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 559–568.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Barnes, J.C., & Beaver, K.M. (2010). An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: a direct test of Moffitt’s maturity gap thesis. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 1176–1185.CrossRef

Bellmore, A., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2011). Peer popularity in the context of ethnicity. In A.H.N. Cillessen, D. Schwartz & L. Mayeux (red.), Popularity in the peer system (pag. 193–215). New York: Guilford.

Boyce, W., Torsheim, T., Currie, C., & Zambon, A. (2006). The family affluence scale as a measure of national wealth: validation of an adolescent self-report measure. Social Indicators Research, 78, 473–487.CrossRef

Brener, N.D., Kann, L., Kinchen, S.A., Grunbaum, J.A., Whalen, L., Eaton, D., & Ross, J.G. (2004). Methodology of the youth risk behavior surveillance system. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 53, 1–13.

Bruyn, E.H. de, & Cillessen, A.H. (2006). Popularity in early adolescence: prosocial and antisocial subtypes. Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 607–627.CrossRef

Caldwell, T.M., Rodgers, B., Jorm, A.F., Christensen, H., Jacomb, P.A., Korten, A.E., & Lynskey, M.T. (2002). Patterns of association between alcohol consumption and symptoms of depression and anxiety in young adults. Addiction, 97, 583–594.CrossRefPubMed

Campbell, R., Starkey, F., Holliday, J., Audrey, S., Bloor, M., Parry-Langdon, N., & Moore, L. (2008). An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial. The Lancet, 371, 1595–1602.

Cillessen, A.H.N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K.H. Rubin, W.M. Bukowski & B. Laursen (red.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pag. 82–99). New York: Guilford Press.

Cillessen, A.H.N., & Mayeux, L. (2004). From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. Child Development, 75, 147–163.CrossRefPubMed

Cillessen, A.H.N., & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102–105.CrossRef

Dijkstra, J.K., Lindenberg, S., Verhulst, F.C., Ormel, J., & Veenstra, R. (2009). The relation between popularity and aggressive, destructive, and norm-breaking behaviors: moderating effects of athletic abilities, physical attractiveness, and prosociality. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 401–413.CrossRef

Dijkstra, J.K., Cillessen, A.H.N., Lindenberg, S., & Veenstra, R. (2010). Basking in reflected glory and its limits: why adolescents hang out with popular peers. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 20, 942–958.CrossRef

Dijkstra, J.K., Kretschmer, T., Pattiselanno, K., Franken, A., Harakeh, Z., Vollebergh, W., & Veenstra, R. (2015). Explaining adolescents’ delinquency and substance use: a test of the maturity gap: the SNARE study. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 52, 747–767.CrossRef

Franken, A., Harakeh, Z., Veenstra, R., Vollebergh, W., & Dijkstra, J.K. (2016). Social status of adolescents with an early onset of externalizing behavior: the SNARE study. Journal of Early Adolescence, 1, 1–17.

Hanson, M.D., & Chen, E. (2007). Socioeconomic status and health behaviors in adolescence: a review of the literature. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 30, 263–285.

Harakeh, Z., De Looze, M.E., Schrijvers, C.T.M., Dorsselaer, S.A.F.M. van, & Vollebergh, W.A.M. (2012). Individual and environmental predictors of health risk behaviours among Dutch adolescents: the HBSC study. Public Health, 126, 566–573.

Hawke, S., & Rieger, E. (2013). Popularity, likeability, and risk-taking in middle adolescence. Health, 5, 41–52.CrossRef

Hu, L., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRef

Inchley, J., Currie, D., Young, T., Samdal, O., Torsheim, T., Augustson, L. et al. (2016). Growing up unequal: Gender and socioeconomic differences in young people’s health and well-being. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) study: international report from the 2013/2014 survey. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe.

Kelly, J.A. (2004). Popular opinion leaders and HIV prevention peer education: resolving discrepant findings, and implications for the development of effective community programmes. AIDS Care, 16, 139–150.

Kelly, J.A., St Lawrence, J.S., Diaz, Y.E., Stevenson, L.Y., Hauth, A.C., Brasfield, T.L., & Andrew, M.E. (1991). HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 81, 168–171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Kendler, K.S., Gardner, C.O., Hickman, M., Heron, J., Macleod, J., Lewis, G., & Dick, D.M. (2014). Socioeconomic status and alcohol-related behaviors in mid-to-late adolescence in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 75, 541–545.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Maccoby, E.E. (1990). Gender and relationships: a developmental account. American Psychologist, 45, 513–520.CrossRefPubMed

Mayeux, L., Sandstrom, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2008). Is being popular a risky proposition? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 18, 49–74.CrossRef

Meschke, L.L., Zweig, J.M., Barber, B.L., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Demographic, biological, psychological, and social predictors of the timing of first intercourse. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 10, 315–338.CrossRef

Moffitt, T.E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.CrossRefPubMed

Moffitt, T.E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 355–375.CrossRefPubMed

Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7e druk.). Los Angeles CA: Muthén & Muthén.

Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.CrossRefPubMed

Prinstein, M.J., Choukas-Bradley, S.C., Helms, S.W., Brechwald, W.A., & Rancourt, D. (2011). High peer popularity longitudinally predicts adolescent health risk behavior, or does it? An examination of linear and quadratic associations. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 36, 980–990.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Saewyc, E.M., Magee, L.L., & Pettingell, S.E. (2004). Teenage pregnancy and associated risk behaviors among sexually abused adolescents. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 36, 98–105.CrossRefPubMed

Sandstrom, M.J., & Cillessen, A.H.N. (2006). Likeable versus popular: distinct implications for adolescent adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30, 305–314.CrossRef

Sass, D.A., Schmitt, T.A., & Marsh, H.W. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: a comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21, 167–180.CrossRef

Satorra, A., & Bentler, P.M. (2001). A scaled difference chi-square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.CrossRef

Schmitt, N., Golubovich, J., & Leong, F.T.L. (2011). Impact of measurement invariance on construct correlations, mean differences, and relations with external correlates: an illustrative example using Big Five and RIASEC measures. Assessment, 18, 412–427.CrossRefPubMed

Schoot, R. van de, Lugtig, P., & Hox, J. (2012). A checklist for testing measurement invariance. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 486–492.CrossRef

Sentse, M., Kiuru, N., Veenstra, R., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). A social network approach to the interplay between adolescents’ bullying and likeability over time. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43, 1409–1420.CrossRefPubMed

Smit, C.R., Leeuw, R.N. de, Bevelander, K.E., Burk, W.J., & Buijzen, M. (2016). A social network-based intervention stimulating peer influence on children’s self-reported water consumption: a randomized control trial. Appetite, 103, 294–301.

Stueve, A., & O’Donnell, L.N. (2005). Early alcohol initiation and subsequent sexual and alcohol risk behaviors among urban youths. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 887–893.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Trimbos Instituut (2014). Roken Jeugd Monitor 2013: factsheet januari 2014. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.

Valente, T.W., Unger, J.B., & Johnson, C.A. (2005). Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. Journal of Adolescent Health, 37, 323–329.CrossRefPubMed

Verdurmen, J., Abraham, M., Planije, M., Monshouwer, K., Dorsselaer, S. van, Schulten, I., Bevers, J., & Vollebergh, W. (2006). Alcoholgebruik en jongeren onder de 16 jaar. Utrecht: Trimbos Instituut.

Warner, J., Weber, T.R., & Albanes, R. (1999). Girls are retarded when they’re stoned. Marijuana and the construction of gender roles among adolescent females. Sex Roles, 40, 25–43.CrossRef

Willoughby, T., Chalmers, H., & Busseri, M.A. (2004). Where is the syndrome? Examining co-occurrence among multiple problem behaviors in adolescence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1022–1037.CrossRefPubMed

Titel: Populariteit, maar niet geliefdheid, is gerelateerd aan risicogedrag van Nederlandse adolescenten
Auteurs: Nina van den Broek, MSc
Marike H. F. Deutz, MSc
Dr. Aart Franken
Prof. Dr. Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Publicatiedatum: 07-02-2017
Uitgeverij: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in: Kind en adolescent / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0167-2436
Elektronisch ISSN: 1876-5998
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-017-0136-9

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Horst, F. van der, Lucassen, N., Kok, R., Sentse, M., Jooren, L., & Luijk, M. (2016). Opgroeien in het hedendaagse gezin. Inleiding in de gezinspedagogiek

Boeken

Rhijn, M. van, & Leuning, E. (2016). Inquiry-based stress reduction in de praktijk. The Work van Byron Katie in psychotherapie

Boeken

Moet ouderlijk verbieden verboden worden?

Zijn we van nature goed?

Opmerkelijk

Kosteneffectiviteit van jeugdinterventies in Nederland: een systematische literatuurreview

De prevalentie van kindermishandeling in Nederland: het belang van nauwkeurige schattingen

Opmerkelijk