Skip to main content
main-content
Top

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

01-12-2017 | Research | Uitgave 1/2017 Open Access

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017

Plug-in-Gait calculation of the knee adduction moment in people with knee osteoarthritis during shod walking: comparison of two different foot marker models

Tijdschrift:
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research > Uitgave 1/2017
Auteurs:
Kade L. Paterson, Rana S. Hinman, Ben R. Metcalf, Kim L. Bennell, Tim V. Wrigley
Belangrijke opmerkingen

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.​1186/​s13047-017-0187-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Abstract

Background

Understanding how kinematic multi-segment foot modelling influences the utility of Plug-in-Gait calculations of the knee adduction moment (KAM) during shod walking is relevant to knee osteoarthritis (OA). Multi-segment foot markers placed on the skin through windows cut in to the shoe provide a more accurate representation of foot mechanics than the traditional marker set used by Plug-in-Gait, which uses fewer markers, placed on the shoe itself. We aimed to investigate whether Plug-in-Gait calculation of the KAM differed when using a kinematic multi-segment foot model compared to the traditional Plug-in-Gait marker set.

Methods

Twenty people with medial knee OA underwent gait analysis in two test conditions: i) Plug-in-Gait model with its two standard foot markers placed on the shoes and; ii) Plug-in-Gait with the heel marker virtualised from a modified-Oxford Foot Model where 8 ft markers were placed on the skin through windows cut in shoe uppers. Outcomes were the peak KAM, KAM impulse and other knee kinetic and kinematic variables.

Results

There were no differences (P > 0.05) in any gait variables between conditions. Excellent agreement was found for all outcome variables, with high correlations (r > 0.88-0.99, P < 0.001), narrow limits of agreement and no proportional bias (R 2 = 0.03–0.14, P > 0.05). The mean difference and 95% confidence intervals for peak KAM were also within the minimal detectable change range demonstrating equivalence.

Conclusions

Plug-in-Gait calculations of the KAM are not altered when using a kinematic multi-segment foot marker model with skin markers placed through windows cut in to the shoe, instead of the traditional marker set placed on top of shoes. Researchers may be confident that applying either foot model does not change the calculation of the KAM using Plug-in-Gait.

Onze productaanbevelingen

BSL Podotherapeut Totaal

Binnen de bundel kunt u gebruik maken van boeken, tijdschriften, e-learnings, web-tv's en uitlegvideo's. BSL Podotherapeut Totaal is overal toegankelijk; via uw PC, tablet of smartphone.

Extra materiaal
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Description: Multiple figures - supplementary limits of agreement plots for secondary outcome measures. Bland Altman plots and the 95% limits of agreement for the (A) peak knee flexion moment, (B) peak knee flexion in loading response, (C) peak knee extension in stance, (D) peak knee adduction in stance, (E) peak internal rotation in stance, (F) stance duration, (G) stride length, (H) cadence, (I) velocity and (J) base of support. The mean difference between conditions is shown on the Y-axis and the standard deviation of the difference is shown on the X-axis. Regression coefficient of proportional bias in data falling above or below the mean difference is shown inset. (ZIP 221 kb)
13047_2017_187_MOESM1_ESM.zip
Literatuur
Over dit artikel

Andere artikelen Uitgave 1/2017

Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 1/2017 Naar de uitgave