Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

25-03-2020 | Letter to the Editor | Uitgave 11/2020

Please, Don’t Shoot the Meta-analysis: A Response to “A Commentary to Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy by Sánchez-Garcia et al. 2019”

Tijdschrift:: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders > Uitgave 11/2020

Auteurs:: Ana B. Sánchez-García, Ana B. Nieto-Libreros, Purificación Galindo-Villardón, Diana L. Robins

» Toegang tot de volledige tekst krijgen

Belangrijke opmerkingen

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Without Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Hier inloggen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Met BSL Psychologie Totaal blijf je als professional steeds op de hoogte van de nieuwste ontwikkelingen binnen jouw vak. Met het online abonnement heb je toegang tot een groot aantal boeken, protocollen, vaktijdschriften en e-learnings op het gebied van psychologie en psychiatrie. Zo kun je op je gemak en wanneer het jou het beste uitkomt verdiepen in jouw vakgebied.

Meer informatie

Arends, L. R. (2006). Multivariate Meta-analysis: Modelling the Heterogeneity. PhD diss., Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Baird, G., Douglas, H. R., & Murphy, M. S. (2011). Recognising and diagnosing autism in children and young people: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ, 343, d6360. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6360. CrossRef

DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986). Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Controlled Clinical Trials, 7(3), 177–188. CrossRef

Higgins, J. P., & Altman, D. G. (2008). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series (pp. 187–241). Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef

Jones, H. E., Gatsonsis, C. A., Trikalinos, T. A., Welton, N. J., & Ades, A. E. (2019). Quantifying how diagnostic test accuracy depends on threshold in a meta-analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 38, 4789–4803. CrossRefPubMed

Lijmer, J. G., Bossuyt, P. M., & Heisterkamp, S. H. (2002). Exploring sources of heterogeneity in systematic reviews of diagnostic tests. Statistics in Medicine, 21(11), 1525–1537. CrossRef

Macaskill, P. (2004). Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 57(9), 925–932. CrossRef

Macaskill, P., Gatsonis, C., Deeks, J., Harbord, R., & Takwoingi, Y. (2010). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Version 0.9.0. London: The Cochrane Collaboration.

Øien, R. A., Cicchetti, D. V., Nordahl-Hansen, A., & Schjølberg, S. (2019). A commentary to “toddler screening for autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy”. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 1837–1852. CrossRef

Rhodes, K. M., Turner, R. M., Savović, J., Jones, H. E., Mawdsley, D., & Higgins, J. P. (2018). Between-trial heterogeneity in meta-analyses may be partially explained by reported design characteristics. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 95, 45–54. CrossRefPubMed

Robins, D. L. (2020). How do we determine the utility of screening tools? Autism, 24(2), 271–273. CrossRef

Rücker, G., Steinhauser, S., Kolampally, S., & Schwarzer, G. (2018). Diagmeta: Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies with several cutpoints.

Rutter, C. M., & Gatsonis, C. A. (2001). A hierarchical regression approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations. Statistics in Medicine, 20(19), 2865–2884. CrossRef

Sánchez-García, A. B., Galindo-Villardón, P., Nieto-Librero, A. B., Martín-Rodero, H., & Robins, D. L. (2019). Toddler screening for autism spectrum disorder: A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(5), 1837–1852. CrossRefPubMed

Takwoingi, Y., Riley, R. D., & Deeks, J. J. (2015). Meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies in mental health. Evidence-Based Mental Health, 18(4), 103–109. CrossRefPubMed

Thompson, S. G. (1994). Systematic review: Why sources of heterogeneity in meta-analysis should be investigated. BMJ, 309(6965), 1351–1355. CrossRefPubMed

UK National Screening Committee. (2012). Screening for autistic spectrum disorders in children under the age of five policy position statement and summary. Retrieved August 22, 2019, from https://legacyscreening.phe.org.uk/autism.

Titel: Please, Don’t Shoot the Meta-analysis: A Response to “A Commentary to Toddler Screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy by Sánchez-Garcia et al. 2019”
Auteurs:: Ana B. Sánchez-García
Ana B. Nieto-Libreros
Purificación Galindo-Villardón
Diana L. Robins
Publicatiedatum: 25-03-2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04462-y
Uitgeverij: Springer US
Tijdschrift: Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Uitgave 11/2020
Print ISSN: 0162-3257
Elektronisch ISSN: 1573-3432

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Tip

Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel

Publisher's Note

Without Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:

BSL Psychologie Totaal

Andere artikelen Uitgave 11/2020

Early Interventionists’ Appraisals of Intervention Strategies for Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Their Peers in Inclusive Childcare Classrooms

An Exploratory Study of a Dimensional Assessment of the Diagnostic Criteria for Autism

Sensory Reactivity at 1 and 2 Years Old is Associated with ASD Severity During the Preschool Years

Restricted and Repetitive Behaviors in Males and Females with Fragile X Syndrome: Developmental Trajectories in Toddlers Through Young Adults

Atypical Development of Attentional Control Associates with Later Adaptive Functioning, Autism and ADHD Traits

Canine Assisted Occupational Therapy for Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Pilot Randomised Control Trial