Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
The valence–space metaphor posits that emotion concepts map onto vertical space such that positive concepts are in upper locations and negative in lower locations. Whilst previous studies have demonstrated this pattern for positive and negative emotions e.g. ‘joy’ and ‘sadness’, the spatial location of neutral emotions, e.g. ‘surprise’, has not been investigated, and little is known about the effect of linguistic background. In this study, we first characterised the emotions joy, surprise and sadness via ratings of their concreteness, imageability, context availability and valence before examining the allocation of these emotions in vertical space. Participants from six linguistic groups completed either a rating task used to characterise the emotions or a word allocation task to implicitly assess where these emotions are positioned in vertical space. Our findings suggest that, across languages, gender, handedness, and ages, positive emotions are located in upper spatial locations and negative emotions in lower spatial locations. In addition, we found that the neutral emotional valence of surprise is reflected in this emotion being mapped mid-way between upper and lower locations onto the vertical plane. This novel finding indicates that the location of a concept on the vertical plane mimics the concept’s degree of emotional valence.
Altarriba, J., Bauer, L. M., & Benvenuto, C. (1999). Concreteness, context availability, and imageability ratings and word associations for abstract, concrete, and emotion words. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31(4), 578–602. CrossRef
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 57, 289–300.
Borghi, A., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as Social Tools: An Embodied View on Abstract Concepts. New York: Springer. CrossRef
Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings. Technical report C-1, Gainesville, FL. The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.
Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. CrossRef
Casasanto, D. (2011). Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(6), 378–383. CrossRef
Clark, H. H., Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1973). On the meeting of semantics and perception. In W. G. Chase (Ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 311–381). New York: Academic Press. CrossRef
Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York: Routledge.
Freeman, J. (1975). The modelling of spatial relations. Computer Graphics and Image Processing, 4(2), 156–171. CrossRef
Holstege, G. (1992). The emotional motor system. European Journal of Morphology, 30(1), 67–79. PubMed
Kousta, S. T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. CrossRef
Macedo, L., Cardoso, A., Reisenzein, R., Lorini, E., & Castelfranchi, C. (2009). Artificial surprise. In J. Vallverdú & D. Casacuberta (Eds.), Handbook of research on synthetic emotions and sociable robotics: New applications in affective computing and artificial intelligence (pp. 267–291). Hershey: Information Science Reference. CrossRef
Mark, D.M., & Frank, A.U. (1989) Concepts of space and spatial language. In E. Anderson (Ed)., Proceedings of the Ninth International Symposium on Computer-Assisted Cartography (Auto-Carto 9), pp. 538–556, Baltimore, Maryland.
Marmolejo-Ramos, F., & Dunn, J. (2013). On the activation of sensorimotor systems during the processing of emotionally-laden stimuli. Universitas Psychologica, 12(5), 1511–1542. CrossRef
Marozzi, M. (2012). A modified Cucconi test for location and scale change alternatives. Revista Colombiana de Estadística, 35(3), 369–382.
Marozzi, M. (2014). The multisample Cucconi test. Statistical Methods and Applications, 23(2), 209–227. CrossRef
McGill, R., Tukey, J. W., & Larsen, W. A. (1978). Variations of box plots. The American Statistician, 32(1), 12–16.
Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25. CrossRef
Reali, F., & Arciniegas, C. (2015). Metaphorical conceptualisation of emotion in Spanish. Two studies on the role of framing. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(1), 20–41. CrossRef
Reisenzein, R. (2009). Emotions as metarepresentational states of mind: Naturalizing the belief–desire theory of emotion. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(1), 6–20. CrossRef
Reisenzein, R., Meyer, W.-U., & Niepel, M. (2012). Surprise. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., pp. 564–570). New York: Elsevier. CrossRef
Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102. CrossRef
Wallbott, H. G. (1998). Bodily expression of emotion. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 879–896. CrossRef
Wilcox, R. (2012). Introduction to robust estimation and hypothesis testing. Amsterdam: Elsevier
Yohai, V. (1987). High breakdown-point and high efficiency estimates for regression. Annals of Statistics, 15(20), 642–656. CrossRef
- Placing joy, surprise and sadness in space: a cross-linguistic study
Juan C. Correa
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg