Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
A. Scholl and K. Moeller contributed equally to this work.
Being able to adequately process numbers is a key competency in everyday life. Yet, self-reported negative affective responses towards numbers are known to deteriorate numerical performance. Here, we investigated how physiological threat responses predict numerical performance. Physiological responses reflect whether individuals evaluate a task as exceeding or matching their resources and in turn experience either threat or challenge, which influences subsequent performance. We hypothesized that, the more individuals respond to a numerical task with physiological threat, the worse they would perform. Results of an experiment with cardiovascular indicators of threat/challenge corroborated this expectation. The findings thereby contribute to our understanding of the physiological mechanism underlying the influence of negative affective responses towards numbers on numerical performance.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Alter, A. L., Aronson, J., Darley, J. M., Rodriguez, C., & Ruble, D. N. (2010). Rising to the threat: reducing stereotype threat by reframing the threat as a challenge. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 166–171. CrossRef
Ashcraft, M. (2002). Math anxiety: personal, educational, and cognitive consequences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 181–185. CrossRef
Ashcraft, M. H., & Kirk, E. P. (2001). The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 224–237. CrossRef
Ashcraft, M. H., & Ridley, K. S. (2005). Math anxiety and its cognitive consequences: a tutorial review. In J. I. D. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 315–327). New York: Psychology Press.
Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beilock, S. L. (2008). Math performance in stressful situations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 339–343. CrossRef
Blascovich, J. (2000). Psychophysiological methods. In H. T. Reis, H. Judd, & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social psychology (pp. 117–137). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blascovich, J. (2008). Challenge, threat, and health. In J. Y. Shah & W. L. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 481–493). New York: Guilford Press.
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2000). Challenge and threat appraisals: the role of affective cues. In J. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 59–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blascovich, J., & Mendes, W. B. (2010). Social psychophysiology and embodiment. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed.). New York: Wiley.
Blascovich, J., Mendes, W. B., Hunter, S. B., & Salomon, K. (1999). Social “facilitation” as challenge and threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 422–429. CrossRef
Blascovich, J., Seery, M. D., Mugridge, C. A., Norris, R. K., & Weisbuch, M. (2004). Predicting athletic performance from cardiovascular indexes of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 683–688. CrossRef
Blascovich, J., & Tomaka, J. (1996). The biopsychosocial model of arousal regulation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 28, pp. 1–51). New York: Academic Press.
Cates, G. L., & Rhymer, K. N. (2003). Examining the relationship between mathematics anxiety and mathematics performance: an instructional hierarchy perspective. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 23–34. CrossRef
Cook, R. D., & Weisberg, S. (1982). Residuals and influence in regression. New York: Chapman & Hall.
De Wit, F. C., Scheepers, D., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). Cardiovascular reactivity and resistance to opposing viewpoints during intragroup conflict. Psychophysiology, 49, 1691–1699. CrossRef
Derakshan, N., & Eysenck, M. W. (2009). Anxiety, processing efficiency, and cognitive performance: new developments from attentional control theory. European Psychologist, 14, 168–176. CrossRef
Derks, B., Scheepers, D., Van Laar, C., & Ellemers, N. (2011). The threat vs. challenge of car parking for women: how self- and group affirmation affect cardiovascular responses. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 178–183. CrossRef
Eden, C., Heine, A., & Jacobs, A. M. (2013). Mathematics anxiety and its development in the course of formal schooling—a review. Psychology, 4, 27–35. CrossRef
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 480–506. CrossRef
Gross, J., Hudson, C., & Price, D. (2009). The long term costs of numeracy difficulties. London: Every Child a Chance Trust and KPMG.
Huber, S., Moeller, K., Nuerk, H.-C., Macizo, P., Herrera, A., & Willmes, K. (2013). Cognitive control in number processing: a computational model. In R. West & T. Stewart (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th international conference on cognitive modeling (pp. 185–190). Ottawa: Carleton University.
Jamieson, J. P., Mendes, W. B., & Nock, M. K. (2013). Improving acute stress responses: the power of reappraisal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 51–56. CrossRef
Krinzinger, H., Kaufman, L., & Willmes, K. (2009). Math anxiety and math ability in early primary school years. Journal of Psycho-Educational Assessment, 27, 206–225. CrossRef
Moenikia, M., & Zahed-Babelan, A. (2010). A study of simple and multiple relations between mathematics attitude, academic motivation and intelligence quotient with mathematics achievement. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1537–1542. CrossRef
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259. CrossRef
Parsons, S., & Bynner, J. (2005) Does numeracy matter more? NRDC (National Research and Development Centre for adult literacy and numeracy).
Pecchinenda, A., & Smith, C. A. (1996). The motivational significance of skin conductance activity during a difficult problem-solving task. Cognition and Emotion, 10, 481–503. CrossRef
Ramirez, G., Gunderson, E. A., Levine, S. C., & Beilock, S. L. (2013). Math anxiety, working memory and math achievement in early elementary school. Journal of Cognition and Development, 14, 187–202. CrossRef
Scheepers, D., de Wit, F., Ellemers, N., & Sassenberg, K. (2012). Social power makes the heart work more efficiently: evidence from cardiovascular markers of challenge and threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 371–374. CrossRef
Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261–302). San Diego: Academic Press.
Tomaka, J., Blascovich, J., Kelsey, R. M., & Leitten, C. L. (1993). Subjective, physiological, and behavioral effects of threat and challenge appraisal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 616–624. CrossRef
Tzelgov, J., Henik, A., & Berger, J. (1992). Controlling Stroop effects by manipulating expectations for color words. Memory & Cognition, 20, 727–735. CrossRef
- Physiological threat responses predict number processing
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg