Top

Gepubliceerd in:

01-05-2011 | Original Article

Photorealism aftereffect

Auteurs: Jun’ichiro Seyama, Ruth S. Nagayama

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 3/2011

Abstract

This study reports a novel visual aftereffect for photorealism judgments. Participants observed image sequences where a photograph was gradually transformed into an artificial image (a painting or a sketch). Their task was to choose the image that was the category boundary between the photograph and the artificial image among the frames of each image sequence. This task was performed before and after observing photographs or artificial images for 1 min. The chosen images were less photorealistic after the observation of artificial images, suggesting an aftereffect for photorealism judgments. However, observation of photographs did not induce an aftereffect. It is known that the observation of the norms for perceptual judgments (e.g., the prototypical face for facial judgments) does not induce aftereffects. Thus, these results suggest that photorealistic images serve as the norm for the perceptual judgment of photorealism. The human visual system may represent the photorealism of artificial images as a deviation from photorealistic images.

vorige artikel Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies

volgende artikel Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task

Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Merget, D., & Schroeder, R. (2006). The effect of behavioral realism and form realism of real-time avater faces on verbal disclosure, nonverbal disclosure, emotion recognition, and copresence in dyadic interaction. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 15(4), 359–372.CrossRef

Carbon, C., & Leder, H. (2006). The Mona Lisa effect: Is ‘our’ Lisa fame or fake? Perception, 35, 411–414.PubMedCrossRef

Carbon, C., Strobach, T., Langton, S., Harsányi, G., Leder, H., & Kovács, G. (2007). Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: Immediate and long lasting. Memory & Cognition, 35(8), 1966–1976.CrossRef

Cutzu, F., Hammoud, R., & Leykin, A. (2005). Distinguishing paintings from photographs. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 100, 249–273.CrossRef

Greenberg, D. P. (1999). A framework for realistic image synthesis. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 44–53.CrossRef

Haji, T., Nose, I., Katsuyama, N., & Taira, M. (2009). Cortical mechanisms for cognition of photograph and painting: An fMRI study. Transactions of the Virtual Reality Society of Japan, 14(1), 121–130.

Ianeva, T., de Vries, A., & Röhrig, H. (2003). Detecting cartoons: A case study in automatic video-genre classification. Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 1, 449–452.

Kajiya, J. T. (1986). The rendering equation. Computer Graphics, 20(4), 143–150.CrossRef

Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(11), 4302–4311.PubMed

Leopold, D. A., O’Toole, A. J., Vetter, T., & Blanz, V. (2001). Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 89–94.PubMedCrossRef

Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(6), 255–260.PubMedCrossRef

Morikawa, K. (2005). Adaptation to asymmetrically distorted faces and its lack of effect on mirror images. Vision Research, 45, 3180–3188.PubMedCrossRef

O’Leary, A., & McMahon, M. (1991). Adaptation to form distortion of a familiar shape. Perception Psychophysics, 49(4), 328–332.PubMedCrossRef

Perrett, D. I., Hietanen, J. K., Oram, M. W., & Benson, P. J. (1992). Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 335, 23–30.CrossRef

Rhodes, G., Jeffery, L., Watson, T. L., Clifford, C. W. G., & Nakayama, K. (2003). Fitting the mind to the world: Face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects. Psychological Science, 14(6), 558–566.PubMedCrossRef

Seyama, J. (2006). Effect of image orientation on the eye direction aftereffect. Psychological Research, 70(5), 367–374.PubMedCrossRef

Seyama, J., & Nagayama, R. S. (2006). Eye direction aftereffect. Psychological Research, 70(1), 59–67.PubMedCrossRef

Seyama, J., & Nagayama, R. (2009). Probing the uncanny valley with the eye-size aftereffect. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(5), 321–339.CrossRef

Stratton, G. (1896). Some preliminary experiments on vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review, 3(6), 611–617.CrossRef

Stratton, G. (1897a). Vision without inversion of the retinal imae. Psychological Review, 4(5), 463–481.CrossRef

Stratton, G. (1897b). Vision without inversion of the retinal image. Psychological Review, 4(4), 341–460.CrossRef

Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion, and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(2), 161–204.

Wallraven, C., Fleming, R., Cunningham, D., Rigau, J., Feixas, M., & Sbert, M. (2009). Categorizing art: Comparing humans and computers. Computers & Graphics, 33(4), 484–495.

Watanabe, S. (2001). Van Gogh, Chagall and pigeons: Picture discrimination in pigeons and humans. Animal Cognition, 4(3–4), 147–151.CrossRef

Watanabe, S., Sakamoto, J., & Wakita, M. (1995). Pigeons’ discrimination of paintings by Monet and Picasso. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63(2), 165–174.PubMedCrossRef

Webster, M. A., Kaping, D., Mizokami, Y., & Duhamel, P. (2004). Adaptation to natural facial categories. Nature, 428, 557–561.PubMedCrossRef

Webster, M. A., & MacLin, O. H. (1999). Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(4), 647–653.CrossRef

Welch, R., Blackman, T., Liu, A., Mellers, B., & Stark, L. (1996). The effects of pictorial realism, delay of visual feedback, and observer interactivity on the subjective sense of presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 5(3), 263–273.

Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(1), 141–145.CrossRef

Titel: Photorealism aftereffect
Auteurs: Jun’ichiro Seyama
Ruth S. Nagayama
Publicatiedatum: 01-05-2011
Uitgeverij: Springer-Verlag
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 3/2011
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-010-0300-9

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 3/2011

The Simon task with multi-component responses: two loci of response–effect compatibility

Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task

Selective attention to pitch amid conflicting auditory information: context-coding and filtering strategies

Perception–production relationships and phase correction in synchronization with two-interval rhythms

Learning of timing patterns and the development of temporal expectations

Two paradigms of measuring serial-order memory: two different patterns of serial-position functions