Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in:

24-09-2015 | Original Article

Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect

Auteurs: Christine Cuskley, Julia Simner, Simon Kirby

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 1/2017

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We examine a high-profile phenomenon known as the bouba–kiki effect, in which non-word names are assigned to abstract shapes in systematic ways (e.g. rounded shapes are preferentially labelled bouba over kiki). In a detailed evaluation of the literature, we show that most accounts of the effect point to predominantly or entirely iconic cross-sensory mappings between acoustic or articulatory properties of sound and shape as the mechanism underlying the effect. However, these accounts have tended to confound the acoustic or articulatory properties of non-words with another fundamental property: their written form. We compare traditional accounts of direct audio or articulatory-visual mapping with an account in which the effect is heavily influenced by matching between the shapes of graphemes and the abstract shape targets. The results of our two studies suggest that the dominant mechanism underlying the effect for literate subjects is matching based on aligning letter curvature and shape roundedness (i.e. non-words with curved letters are matched to round shapes). We show that letter curvature is strong enough to significantly influence word–shape associations even in auditory tasks, where written word forms are never presented to participants. However, we also find an additional phonological influence in that voiced sounds are preferentially linked with rounded shapes, although this arises only in a purely auditory word–shape association task. We conclude that many previous investigations of the bouba–kiki effect may not have given appropriate consideration or weight to the influence of orthography among literate subjects.
Voetnoten
1
The limitations on our materials in terms of voicing, orthography, and use of English phonemes creates a third contrast: that between stop (k, t, g, d) and continuant (s, f, z, v) consonants. This means that our items are stretched across all possible contrasts, and may make results difficult to interpret. The ideal remedy to this would be to test voiced/voiceless pairs of curved and angular stops and continuants. However, the constraints of English phonology and orthography prevent this: there are no voiced angular stops and no voiceless angular continuants in English. We address this issue more specifically in the results of each study, by looking at the specific rank of ratings for each pair of items combined with specific predictions informed by earlier results.
 
2
For all p values reported in both experiments, we provide corrected p values (unless otherwise noted) using conservative sequential Bonferroni correction (Cramer et al., 2014), given both the use of multiple post hoc ANOVAs to explore effects of stop/continuant status and the general use of multi-way ANOVAs.
 
3
Due to the fully crossed nature of our items, constrained by facts of English phonology and orthography described in the materials section, we also made post hoc analyses using two additional ANOVAs: one where stop/continuant status was included in lieu of voicing (shape × orthography × stop/continuant) and one in which stop/continuant status was included in lieu of orthography (shape × voicing × stop/continuant). A four-way model, shape × stop/continuant status × voicing × orthography, is impractical in this case since this model would result in eight cells, and we have only six types of items (two shapes, two letter shape types, two sound types). The results observed in the original ANOVA were straightforwardly replicated [significant interaction of shape × orthography, F(1, 292) = 671.28, p < 0.001; \(\eta_{p}^{2}\) = 0.509], and no additional significant interactions or effects emerged (all F’s < 1; p > 0.05). Replacing orthography with stop/continuant status (2 × 2 × 2; shape × voicing × stop/continuant status) did result in a significant three-way interaction of shape, voicing, and stop/continuant status [F(1, 292) = 671.28, p < 0.001], since crossing voicing and stop/continuant status results in divisions in orthography. Unsurprisingly, this interaction accounts for the same amount of variance explained by orthography in the other models (\(\eta_{p}^{2}\) = 0.509).
 
4
As with Experiment 1, all reported p values are corrected due to multiple post hoc ANOVAS.
 
5
As in the first experiment, we ran two additional ANOVA analyses to explore effects of stop/continuant status on shape–word ratings: one which excluded voicing in favour of stop/continuant status (shape × stop/continuant × orthography) and one which excluded orthography in favour of stop/continuant status (shape × voicing × stop/continuant; model 2c. In this case, these additional analyses presented with slightly more complicated results due to effects of voicing. Where voicing was excluded, the interaction between shape and orthography reported in the main ANOVA remained [F (1, 257) = 113.87, p < 0.001], and the voicing effect was borne out as a three-way interaction between shape, stop/continuant status, and orthography [F(1, 257) = 32.55, p < 0.001]. Where orthography was excluded, the interaction between shape and voicing remained [F(1, 257) = 32.55, p < 0.001], and the effect of orthography emerged in the form of a three-way interaction between shape, stop/continuant status, and voicing [F (1, 257) = 113.87, p < 0.001].
 
Literatuur
go back to reference Ahlner, F., & Zlatev, J. (2010). Cross-modal iconicity: a cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies, 38(1), 298–348.CrossRef Ahlner, F., & Zlatev, J. (2010). Cross-modal iconicity: a cognitive semiotic approach to sound symbolism. Sign Systems Studies, 38(1), 298–348.CrossRef
go back to reference Berlin, B. (1994). Evidence for pervasive synaesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 76–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Berlin, B. (1994). Evidence for pervasive synaesthetic sound symbolism in ethnozoological nomenclature. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 76–93). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172.CrossRefPubMed Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). “Bouba” and “Kiki” in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape–sound matches, but different shape–taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Brown, R., Black, A., & Horowitz, A. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 312–318. Brown, R., Black, A., & Horowitz, A. (1955). Phonetic symbolism in natural languages. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 312–318.
go back to reference Carr, P. (2012). English phonetics and phonology: an introduction. Hoboken: Wiley. Carr, P. (2012). English phonetics and phonology: an introduction. Hoboken: Wiley.
go back to reference Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Yip Lai, C., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81(3), 227–241.CrossRefPubMed Cheung, H., Chen, H.-C., Yip Lai, C., Wong, O. C., & Hills, M. (2001). The development of phonological awareness: effects of spoken language experience and orthography. Cognition, 81(3), 227–241.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Cheung, H., & Chin, H.-C. (2004). Early orthographic experience modifies both phonological awareness and on-line speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 1–28.CrossRef Cheung, H., & Chin, H.-C. (2004). Early orthographic experience modifies both phonological awareness and on-line speech processing. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(1), 1–28.CrossRef
go back to reference Cramer, A.O.J, Van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R.P., Waldorp, L.J., Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Hidden multiplicity in multiway ANOVA: Prevalence, consequences, and remedies. http://www.ejwagenmakers.com/papers.html. Accessed 20 Nov 2014. Cramer, A.O.J, Van Ravenzwaaij, D., Matzke D., Steingroever, H., Wetzels, R., Grasman, R.P., Waldorp, L.J., Wagenmakers, E-J. (2014). Hidden multiplicity in multiway ANOVA: Prevalence, consequences, and remedies. http://​www.​ejwagenmakers.​com/​papers.​html. Accessed 20 Nov 2014.
go back to reference Cuskley, C. (2013b). Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5(1), 37–60. Cuskley, C. (2013b). Mappings between linguistic sound and motion. Public Journal of Semiotics, 5(1), 37–60.
go back to reference Cuskley, C., & Kirby, S. (2013). Synaesthesia, cross-modality and language evolution. In J. Simner & E. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of synaesthesia (pp. 869–907). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cuskley, C., & Kirby, S. (2013). Synaesthesia, cross-modality and language evolution. In J. Simner & E. Hubbard (Eds.), Oxford handbook of synaesthesia (pp. 869–907). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference D’Onofrio, A. (2013). Phonetic detail and dimensionality in word–shape correspondences: refining the bouba–kiki paradigm. Language and Speech,. doi:10.1177/0023830913507694. (preprint). D’Onofrio, A. (2013). Phonetic detail and dimensionality in word–shape correspondences: refining the bouba–kiki paradigm. Language and Speech,. doi:10.​1177/​0023830913507694​. (preprint).
go back to reference Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings. a cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52(3), 259–268.CrossRefPubMed Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings. a cross-cultural study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52(3), 259–268.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Fischer, S. (1922). Uber das enstehen und verstehen von namen. Arch. f. d. Gestalt Psychology, 42, 335–368. Fischer, S. (1922). Uber das enstehen und verstehen von namen. Arch. f. d. Gestalt Psychology, 42, 335–368.
go back to reference Fort, M., Weiß, A., Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Looking for the bouba–kiki effect in pre-lexical infants. Poster presented at the International Child Phonology Conference (June 12, 2013). Nijmegen: Radboud University. Fort, M., Weiß, A., Martin, A., & Peperkamp, S. (2013). Looking for the bouba–kiki effect in pre-lexical infants. Poster presented at the International Child Phonology Conference (June 12, 2013). Nijmegen: Radboud University.
go back to reference Fox, C. (1935). An experimental study of naming. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 545–579.CrossRef Fox, C. (1935). An experimental study of naming. American Journal of Psychology, 47, 545–579.CrossRef
go back to reference Gallace, A., Boschin, E., & Spence, C. (2011). On the taste of ‘bouba’ and ‘kiki’: an exploration of word–food associations in neurologically normal participants. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 34–46.CrossRefPubMed Gallace, A., Boschin, E., & Spence, C. (2011). On the taste of ‘bouba’ and ‘kiki’: an exploration of word–food associations in neurologically normal participants. Cognitive Neuroscience, 2(1), 34–46.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (1994). Sound symbolism. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hinton, L., Nichols, J., & Ohala, J. (1994). Sound symbolism. In L. Hinton, J. Nichols, & J. Ohala (Eds.), Sound symbolism (pp. 1–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
go back to reference Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–96.CrossRef Hockett, C. (1960). The origin of speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–96.CrossRef
go back to reference Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65.CrossRefPubMed Imai, M., Kita, S., Nagumo, M., & Okada, H. (2008). Sound symbolism facilitates early verb learning. Cognition, 109, 54–65.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Irwin, F., & Newland, E. (1940). A genetic study of the naming of visual figures. Journal of Psychology, 9, 3–16.CrossRef Irwin, F., & Newland, E. (1940). A genetic study of the naming of visual figures. Journal of Psychology, 9, 3–16.CrossRef
go back to reference Jesperson, O. (1933). Linguistica: Selected papers of O. Jesperson in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard. Jesperson, O. (1933). Linguistica: Selected papers of O. Jesperson in English, French and German. Copenhagen: Levin and Munksgaard.
go back to reference Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright. Köhler, W. (1929). Gestalt psychology. New York: Liveright.
go back to reference Köhler, W. (1930). Gestalt Psychology (British Edition). London: Liveright. Köhler, W. (1930). Gestalt Psychology (British Edition). London: Liveright.
go back to reference Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Liveright. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Liveright.
go back to reference Koriat, A. (1977). The symbolic implications of vowels and of their orthographic representations in two natural languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6(2), 93–104.CrossRef Koriat, A. (1977). The symbolic implications of vowels and of their orthographic representations in two natural languages. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 6(2), 93–104.CrossRef
go back to reference Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westerman, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114, 19–28.CrossRefPubMed Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westerman, G. (2010). The shape of words in the brain. Cognition, 114, 19–28.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Lukatela, K., Carello, C., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). Phonological awareness in illiterates: observations from Serbo-Croatian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 463–487.CrossRef Lukatela, K., Carello, C., Shankweiler, D., & Liberman, I. Y. (1995). Phonological awareness in illiterates: observations from Serbo-Croatian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 463–487.CrossRef
go back to reference Marks, L. E. (1996). On perceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 11(1), 39–66.CrossRef Marks, L. E. (1996). On perceptual metaphors. Metaphor and Symbol, 11(1), 39–66.CrossRef
go back to reference Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: word–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322.CrossRefPubMed Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: word–shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Monaghan, P., Mattock, K., & Walker, P. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1152–1164. Monaghan, P., Mattock, K., & Walker, P. (2012). The role of sound symbolism in word learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1152–1164.
go back to reference Newman, S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53–75.CrossRef Newman, S. (1933). Further experiments in phonetic symbolism. American Journal of Psychology, 45, 53–75.CrossRef
go back to reference Nielsen, A., & Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete–maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 115–124.CrossRefPubMed Nielsen, A., & Rendall, D. (2011). The sound of round: evaluating the sound-symbolic role of consonants in the classic takete–maluma phenomenon. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 115–124.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Nielsen, A., & Rendall, D. (2012). The source and magnitude of sound-symbolic biases in processing artificial word material and their implications for language learning and transmission. Language and Cognition, 4(2), 115–125.CrossRef Nielsen, A., & Rendall, D. (2012). The source and magnitude of sound-symbolic biases in processing artificial word material and their implications for language learning and transmission. Language and Cognition, 4(2), 115–125.CrossRef
go back to reference Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225–252.CrossRef Nuckolls, J. B. (1999). The case for sound symbolism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 225–252.CrossRef
go back to reference Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112, 181–186.CrossRefPubMed Nygaard, L. C., Cook, A. E., & Namy, L. L. (2009). Sound to meaning correspondences facilitate word learning. Cognition, 112, 181–186.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference O’Boyle, M. W., Miller, D. A., & Rahmani, F. (1987). Sound-meaning relationships in speakers of Urdu and English: evidence for a cross-cultural phonetic symbolism. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 273–288.CrossRefPubMed O’Boyle, M. W., Miller, D. A., & Rahmani, F. (1987). Sound-meaning relationships in speakers of Urdu and English: evidence for a cross-cultural phonetic symbolism. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16, 273–288.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for word–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 173–186.CrossRefPubMed Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for word–shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 173–186.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Parise, C., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 319–333.CrossRefPubMed Parise, C., & Spence, C. (2012). Audiovisual crossmodal correspondences and sound symbolism: a study using the implicit association test. Experimental Brain Research, 220, 319–333.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Peña, M., Mehler, J., & Nespor, M. (2011). The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1419–1421.CrossRefPubMed Peña, M., Mehler, J., & Nespor, M. (2011). The role of audiovisual processing in early conceptual development. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1419–1421.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia: a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(1), 3–34. Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2001). Synaesthesia: a window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(1), 3–34.
go back to reference Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2005). Synaesthesia: a window into the hard problem of consciousness. In L. Robertson & N. Sagiv (Eds.), Synaesthesia: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 127–189). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. (2005). Synaesthesia: a window into the hard problem of consciousness. In L. Robertson & N. Sagiv (Eds.), Synaesthesia: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience (pp. 127–189). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Reeve, C. D. C. (1998). Translation of Plato’s Cratylus (HPC Classic Series). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing. Reeve, C. D. C. (1998). Translation of Plato’s Cratylus (HPC Classic Series). Cambridge: Hackett Publishing.
go back to reference Rizzolati, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef Rizzolati, G., & Craighero, L. (2004). The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 27, 169–192.CrossRef
go back to reference Robson, D. (2011). Kiki or bouba? In search of language’s missing link. The New Scientist, 2821, 12–16. Robson, D. (2011). Kiki or bouba? In search of language’s missing link. The New Scientist, 2821, 12–16.
go back to reference Rogers, S., & Ross, A. (1975). A cross-cultural test of the maluma–takete phenomenon. Perception, 5(2), 105–106.CrossRef Rogers, S., & Ross, A. (1975). A cross-cultural test of the maluma–takete phenomenon. Perception, 5(2), 105–106.CrossRef
go back to reference Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225.CrossRef Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3), 225.CrossRef
go back to reference Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library. Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. New York: Philosophical Library.
go back to reference Simner, J. (2011). Yellow-tasting sounds: Synaesthesia’s merging of the senses. Talk presented to Oxford University Department of Psychology, May 2011. Simner, J. (2011). Yellow-tasting sounds: Synaesthesia’s merging of the senses. Talk presented to Oxford University Department of Psychology, May 2011.
go back to reference Simner, J., Cuskley, C., & Kirby, S. (2010). What sound does that taste? Perception, 39, 553–569.CrossRefPubMed Simner, J., Cuskley, C., & Kirby, S. (2010). What sound does that taste? Perception39, 553–569.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., & Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56(2), 233–262.CrossRef Slowiaczek, L. M., Soltano, E. G., Wieting, S. J., & Bishop, K. L. (2003). An investigation of phonology and orthography in spoken-word recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 56(2), 233–262.CrossRef
go back to reference Stone, G., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. (1997). Perception is a two way street: feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337–359.CrossRef Stone, G., Vanhoy, M., & Van Orden, G. (1997). Perception is a two way street: feedforward and feedback phonology in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 337–359.CrossRef
go back to reference Teller, D. Y. (1979). The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: a psychophysical technique for use with human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 135–153.CrossRef Teller, D. Y. (1979). The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: a psychophysical technique for use with human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 2, 135–153.CrossRef
go back to reference Uznadze, D. (1924). Ein experimenteller bietrag zum problem der psychologischen grundlagen der namengebung. Psychology Forsch, 5, 24–43.CrossRef Uznadze, D. (1924). Ein experimenteller bietrag zum problem der psychologischen grundlagen der namengebung. Psychology Forsch, 5, 24–43.CrossRef
go back to reference Walker, P., Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science, 21(1), 21–25.CrossRefPubMed Walker, P., Bremner, J. G., Mason, U., Spring, J., Mattock, K., Slater, A., & Johnson, S. P. (2010). Preverbal infants’ sensitivity to synaesthetic cross-modality correspondences. Psychological Science, 21(1), 21–25.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ward, J., & Simner, J. (2003). Lexical-gustatory synaesthesia: linguistic and conceptual factors. Cognition, 89, 237–261.CrossRefPubMed Ward, J., & Simner, J. (2003). Lexical-gustatory synaesthesia: linguistic and conceptual factors. Cognition, 89, 237–261.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Werner, H. (1957). Comparative psychology of mental development (revised edition). New York: International Universities Press. Werner, H. (1957). Comparative psychology of mental development (revised edition). New York: International Universities Press.
go back to reference Werner, H., & Wapner, S. (1952). Toward a general theory of perception. Psychological Review, 59, 324–338.CrossRefPubMed Werner, H., & Wapner, S. (1952). Toward a general theory of perception. Psychological Review, 59, 324–338.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 93, 10–19.CrossRefPubMed Westbury, C. (2005). Implicit sound symbolism in lexical access: evidence from an interference task. Brain and Language, 93, 10–19.CrossRefPubMed
go back to reference Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: the consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 5(4), 683–689.CrossRef Ziegler, J. C., & Ferrand, L. (1998). Orthography shapes the perception of speech: the consistency effect in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 5(4), 683–689.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Phonological and orthographic influences in the bouba–kiki effect
Auteurs
Christine Cuskley
Julia Simner
Simon Kirby
Publicatiedatum
24-09-2015
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 1/2017
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-015-0709-2