Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research 8/2019

15-06-2018 | Original Article

Person information facilitates memory for face identity

Auteurs: Katia Mattarozzi, Valentina Colonnello, Paolo Maria Russo, Alexander Todorov

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 8/2019

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Abstract

We tested whether episodic information about people facilitates memory for their faces (Experiment 1) and whether this effect is specific for face identity (Experiment 2). Participants were presented with faces paired with behavioral descriptions (positive, neutral, or negative) and faces displayed alone. In both experiments, participants were more likely to recognize faces paired with behavioral descriptions, and after 1-week delay, their memory was better for faces paired with descriptions of salient behavior (i.e., with positive and negative valence) than faces paired with neutral behaviors or faces presented without information. To examine whether these effects are about memory for face identity rather than face image memory, in Experiment 2, we presented different facial images (varying in facial angle) of the same people at the encoding and at the recognition test. Although this manipulation decreased the overall recognition, the findings of Experiment 1 were fully replicated. The findings suggest that minimal affective information is sufficient to facilitate memory for face identity.
Literatuur
go back to reference Bell, R., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Giang, T., Schain, C., & Riether, N. (2012a). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 457–472.CrossRef Bell, R., Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Giang, T., Schain, C., & Riether, N. (2012a). How specific is source memory for faces of cheaters? Evidence for categorical emotional tagging. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 457–472.CrossRef
go back to reference Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M., & Giang, T. (2012b). On the flexibility of social source memory: a test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1512–1529. Bell, R., Buchner, A., Kroneisen, M., & Giang, T. (2012b). On the flexibility of social source memory: a test of the emotional incongruity hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1512–1529.
go back to reference Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261–275.CrossRef Bell, R., Buchner, A., & Musch, J. (2010). Enhanced old-new recognition and source memory for faces of cooperators and defectors in a social-dilemma game. Cognition, 117, 261–275.CrossRef
go back to reference Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 379–390. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 379–390.
go back to reference Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.CrossRef Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.CrossRef
go back to reference Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 212–224.CrossRef Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30, 212–224.CrossRef
go back to reference Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1–31.CrossRef Burton, A. M., Bruce, V., & Hancock, P. J. B. (1999). From pixels to people: a model of familiar face recognition. Cognitive Science, 23, 1–31.CrossRef
go back to reference Burton, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2011). Unfamiliar face perception. In A. Calder, J. V. Haxby, M. Johnson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 287–306). Oxford York: Oxford University Press. Burton, A. M., & Jenkins, R. (2011). Unfamiliar face perception. In A. Calder, J. V. Haxby, M. Johnson & G. Rhodes (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 287–306). Oxford York: Oxford University Press.
go back to reference Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2011). Mental Representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 943–958.CrossRef Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2011). Mental Representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 943–958.CrossRef
go back to reference Carlston, D. E., Skowronski, J. J., & Sparks, C. (1995). Savings in relearning: II. On the formation of behavior-based trait associations and inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 420–436.CrossRef Carlston, D. E., Skowronski, J. J., & Sparks, C. (1995). Savings in relearning: II. On the formation of behavior-based trait associations and inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 420–436.CrossRef
go back to reference Craik, F. I. M., & Blankstein, K. R. (1975). Psychophysiology and human memory. In P. H. Venables & M. J. Christie (Eds.), Research in psychophysiology (pp. 388–417). New York: Wiley. Craik, F. I. M., & Blankstein, K. R. (1975). Psychophysiology and human memory. In P. H. Venables & M. J. Christie (Eds.), Research in psychophysiology (pp. 388–417). New York: Wiley.
go back to reference Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRef Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRef
go back to reference Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.CrossRef Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268–294.CrossRef
go back to reference Erk, S., Martin, S., & Walter, H. (2005). Emotional context during encoding of neutral items modulates brain activation not only during encoding but also during recognition. Neuroimage, 26, 829–838.CrossRef Erk, S., Martin, S., & Walter, H. (2005). Emotional context during encoding of neutral items modulates brain activation not only during encoding but also during recognition. Neuroimage, 26, 829–838.CrossRef
go back to reference Falvello, V. B., Vinson, M., Ferrari, C., & Todorov, A. (2015). The robustness of learning about the trustworthiness of other people. Social Cognition, 33, 368–386.CrossRef Falvello, V. B., Vinson, M., Ferrari, C., & Todorov, A. (2015). The robustness of learning about the trustworthiness of other people. Social Cognition, 33, 368–386.CrossRef
go back to reference Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.CrossRef
go back to reference Fiedler, K., Kaczor, K., Haarmann, S., Stegmuller, M., & Maloney, J. (2009). Impression-formation advantage in memory for faces: when eyewitnesses are interested in targets’ likeability, rather than their identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 793–807.CrossRef Fiedler, K., Kaczor, K., Haarmann, S., Stegmuller, M., & Maloney, J. (2009). Impression-formation advantage in memory for faces: when eyewitnesses are interested in targets’ likeability, rather than their identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 793–807.CrossRef
go back to reference Fuhrman, R. W., Bodenhausen, G., V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1989). On the trait implications of social behaviors: kindness, intelligence, goodness, and normality ratings for 400 behavior statements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 587–597.CrossRef Fuhrman, R. W., Bodenhausen, G., V., & Lichtenstein, M. (1989). On the trait implications of social behaviors: kindness, intelligence, goodness, and normality ratings for 400 behavior statements. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 21, 587–597.CrossRef
go back to reference Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burtun, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 330–337.CrossRef Hancock, P. J. B., Bruce, V., & Burtun, A. M. (2000). Recognition of unfamiliar faces. Trends in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4, 330–337.CrossRef
go back to reference Herzmann, G., & Sommer, W. (2010). Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: an ERP investigation of newly learned faces. Brain Research, 1356, 54–72.CrossRef Herzmann, G., & Sommer, W. (2010). Effects of previous experience and associated knowledge on retrieval processes of faces: an ERP investigation of newly learned faces. Brain Research, 1356, 54–72.CrossRef
go back to reference Hills, P. J., Lewis, M. B., & Honey, R. C. (2008). Stereotype priming in face recognition: interactions between semantic and visual information in face encoding. Cognition, 108, 185–200.CrossRef Hills, P. J., Lewis, M. B., & Honey, R. C. (2008). Stereotype priming in face recognition: interactions between semantic and visual information in face encoding. Cognition, 108, 185–200.CrossRef
go back to reference Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323.CrossRef Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323.CrossRef
go back to reference Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory, 17, 557–596.CrossRef Johnston, R. A., & Edmonds, A. J. (2009). Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: a review. Memory, 17, 557–596.CrossRef
go back to reference Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1, 99–113.CrossRef Kensinger, E. A. (2009). Remembering the details: effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1, 99–113.CrossRef
go back to reference Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. PNAS, 101, 3310–3315.CrossRef Kensinger, E. A., & Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotional memory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. PNAS, 101, 3310–3315.CrossRef
go back to reference Kerr, N. H., & Winograd, E. (1982). Effects of contextual elaboration on face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 603–609.CrossRef Kerr, N. H., & Winograd, E. (1982). Effects of contextual elaboration on face recognition. Memory & Cognition, 10, 603–609.CrossRef
go back to reference Klantzky, R. L., Martin, G. L., & Kane, R., A (1982). Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 10, 195–206.CrossRef Klantzky, R. L., Martin, G. L., & Kane, R., A (1982). Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 10, 195–206.CrossRef
go back to reference Maratos, E. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of the retrieval of emotional and non-emotional context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 877–891.CrossRef Maratos, E. J., & Rugg, M. D. (2001). Electrophysiological correlates of the retrieval of emotional and non-emotional context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 877–891.CrossRef
go back to reference Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2010). Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 239–250.CrossRef Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2010). Deep and shallow encoding effects on face recognition: an ERP study. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 239–250.CrossRef
go back to reference Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 33–52.CrossRef Mather, M. (2007). Emotional arousal and memory binding. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2, 33–52.CrossRef
go back to reference Mattarozzi, K., Todorov, A., & Codispoti, M. (2015). Memory for faces: the effect of facial appearance and the context in which the face is encountered. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 308–317.CrossRef Mattarozzi, K., Todorov, A., & Codispoti, M. (2015). Memory for faces: the effect of facial appearance and the context in which the face is encountered. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 79, 308–317.CrossRef
go back to reference Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under condition of restricted awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 713–740.CrossRef Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under condition of restricted awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 713–740.CrossRef
go back to reference Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory. The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176–180.CrossRef Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thompson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory. The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176–180.CrossRef
go back to reference Neumann, M. F., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2013). Viewers extract mean and individual identity from sets of famous faces. Cognition, 128, 56–63.CrossRef Neumann, M. F., Schweinberger, S. R., & Burton, A. M. (2013). Viewers extract mean and individual identity from sets of famous faces. Cognition, 128, 56–63.CrossRef
go back to reference Phillips, P. J., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., & Rauss, P. (1998). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 16, 295–306.CrossRef Phillips, P. J., Wechsler, H., Huang, J., & Rauss, P. (1998). The FERET database and evaluation procedure for face recognition algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 16, 295–306.CrossRef
go back to reference Postman, L. (1964). Short-term memory and incidental learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press. Postman, L. (1964). Short-term memory and incidental learning. In A. W. Melton (Ed.), Categories of human learning. New York: Academic Press.
go back to reference Rule, N. O., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces. Cognition, 2, 207–218.CrossRef Rule, N. O., Slepian, M. L., & Ambady, N. (2012). A memory advantage for untrustworthy faces. Cognition, 2, 207–218.CrossRef
go back to reference Schupp, H. T., Ohman, A., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. J., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion, 4, 189–200.CrossRef Schupp, H. T., Ohman, A., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. J., Stockburger, J., & Hamm, A. O. (2004). The facilitated processing of threatening faces: an ERP analysis. Emotion, 4, 189–200.CrossRef
go back to reference Schupp, H. T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2007). Selective visual attention to emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1082–1089.CrossRef Schupp, H. T., Stockburger, J., Codispoti, M., Junghofer, M., Weike, A. I., & Hamm, A. O. (2007). Selective visual attention to emotion. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 1082–1089.CrossRef
go back to reference Snodograss, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 34–50.CrossRef Snodograss, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 34–50.CrossRef
go back to reference Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1051–1065.CrossRef Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2002). Spontaneous trait inferences are bound to actors’ faces: evidence from a false recognition paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1051–1065.CrossRef
go back to reference Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549–562.CrossRef Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2003). The efficiency of binding spontaneous trait inferences to actors’ faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 549–562.CrossRef
go back to reference Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2004). The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 482–493.CrossRef Todorov, A., & Uleman, J. S. (2004). The person reference process in spontaneous trait inferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 482–493.CrossRef
go back to reference Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRef Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80, 352–373.CrossRef
go back to reference Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204.CrossRef Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quartely Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161–204.CrossRef
go back to reference Wang, B. (2013). Facial expression influences recognition memory for faces: robust enhancement effect of fearful expression. Memory, 21, 301–314.CrossRef Wang, B. (2013). Facial expression influences recognition memory for faces: robust enhancement effect of fearful expression. Memory, 21, 301–314.CrossRef
go back to reference Wiese, H., Altmann, C. S., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 56, 26–36.CrossRef Wiese, H., Altmann, C. S., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). Effects of attractiveness on face memory separated from distinctiveness: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Neuropsychologia, 56, 26–36.CrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Person information facilitates memory for face identity
Auteurs
Katia Mattarozzi
Valentina Colonnello
Paolo Maria Russo
Alexander Todorov
Publicatiedatum
15-06-2018
Uitgeverij
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in
Psychological Research / Uitgave 8/2019
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1037-0

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2019

Psychological Research 8/2019 Naar de uitgave