Skip to main content
Top
Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Urologie 8/2013

01-12-2013

Perioperatieve, oncologische en functionele leercurves van robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) in een hoogvolumeziekenhuis

Auteurs: Drs. E.R.P. Collette, Dr. M. Kliffen, Dr. D. van den Ouden, Drs. R.P. Engel, Drs. O.S. Klaver

Gepubliceerd in: Tijdschrift voor Urologie | Uitgave 8/2013

Log in om toegang te krijgen
share
DELEN

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

  • Optie A:
    Klik op de rechtermuisknop op de link en selecteer de optie “linkadres kopiëren”
  • Optie B:
    Deel de link per e-mail

Samenvatting

Doelstelling

Analyse van perioperatieve, oncologische en functionele leercurves van robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) in een hoogvolumeziekenhuis.

Methoden

Prospectieve dataverzameling van 416 patiënten die een laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) ondergingen tussen januari 2009 en maart 2011 in ons ziekenhuis, uitgevoerd door 1 operateur. Follow-up van een jaar met gevalideerde vragenlijsten.

Resultaten

De gemiddelde consoletijd was 129 minuten, bloedverlies 321 ml, opnameduur 3,6 dagen en katheterisatieduur 7,7 dagen. Bij 8% van de patiënten trad een complicatie op. Een positief snijvlak werd bij 16% gezien (12% in de pT2- en 28% in de pT3-groep). Bij 88% werd geen PSA-recidief vastgesteld (92% in de pT2- en 76% in de pT3-groep). 87% van de patiënten was continent, 54% potent, 76% bereikte bifecta en 54% trifecta. Consoletijd, opnameduur, erectiele functie en positieve snijvlakken lieten een gunstige trend zien bij het toenemen van het aantal geopereerde patiënten.

Conclusie

RALP is een veilige ingreep, maar met een leercurve die langer is dan vaak wordt aangenomen. Na circa 200 procedures dalen de positieve snijvlakken significant tot onder de 10% in de pT2-groep. Er is een significant dalende trend waarneembaar van de consoletijd en opnameduur. Er is een positieve trend waarneembaar in herstel van erectiele functie. Operateurs hebben de verantwoordelijkheid realistische verwachtingen te schetsen, gebaseerd op de resultaten die zijn behaald in de eigen serie verrichtingen.
Literatuur
2.
go back to reference Bianco Jr FJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy; long¬term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). Urology. 2005:66(Suppl):83–94. Bianco Jr FJ, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy; long¬term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function ("trifecta"). Urology. 2005:66(Suppl):83–94.
3.
go back to reference Park JW, Lee HW, Kim W, et al. Comparative assessment of a single surgeon’s series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted. J Endourol. 2011;25:597–602.PubMedCrossRef Park JW, Lee HW, Kim W, et al. Comparative assessment of a single surgeon’s series of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional versus robot-assisted. J Endourol. 2011;25:597–602.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87:408–10.PubMedCrossRef Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87:408–10.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol. 2000;10:520–3.PubMed Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L, et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog Urol. 2000;10:520–3.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Pasticier G, Rietbergen JBW, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol. 2001;40:70–4.PubMedCrossRef Pasticier G, Rietbergen JBW, Guillonneau B, et al. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur Urol. 2001;40:70–4.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168:945–9.PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168:945–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W, 3rd, et al. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urol. 2008;72:1068–72.PubMedCrossRef Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W, 3rd, et al. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urol. 2008;72:1068–72.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Herrell SD, Smith JRJA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: What is the learning curve? Urol. 2005;66:105.PubMedCrossRef Herrell SD, Smith JRJA. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: What is the learning curve? Urol. 2005;66:105.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171–7.PubMedCrossRef Vickers AJ, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007;99:1171–7.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vickers AJ, Savage CJ, Hruza M, et al. The surgical learning curve for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:475–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–63.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W, et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur Urol. 2009;55:1037–63.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen R, et al. Systematic review and meta¬analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431–52.PubMedCrossRef Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen R, et al. Systematic review and meta¬analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:431–52.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:405–17.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:405–17.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering T, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:418–30.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering T, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:418–30.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:382–404.PubMedCrossRef Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic review and meta- analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62:382–404.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62:368–81.PubMedCrossRef Montorsi F, Wilson TG, Rosen RC, et al. Best practices in robot¬assisted radical prostatectomy: recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. Eur Urol. 2012;62:368–81.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Online nomogram voor risico berekening. Beschikbaar via http://nomograms.mskcc.org/ Prostate/PreTreatment.aspx. Geraadpleegd oktober 2012. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Online nomogram voor risico berekening. Beschikbaar via http://​nomograms.​mskcc.​org/​ Prostate/PreTreatment.aspx. Geraadpleegd oktober 2012.
19.
go back to reference Rambaran SS, Van den Ouden D, Kliffen M, et al. Robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie in een perifeer ziekenhuis: perioperatieve parameters en korte termijn functionele en oncologische resultaten bij de eerste 400 patiënten. Tijdschrift voor Urologie. 2011;6:126–32.CrossRef Rambaran SS, Van den Ouden D, Kliffen M, et al. Robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie in een perifeer ziekenhuis: perioperatieve parameters en korte termijn functionele en oncologische resultaten bij de eerste 400 patiënten. Tijdschrift voor Urologie. 2011;6:126–32.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;244:931–7. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;244:931–7.
21.
go back to reference Llanos CA, Blieden C, Vernon SE. Processing radical prostatectomies: an alternate-slice method is comparable with total embedding. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16:284–7.PubMedCrossRef Llanos CA, Blieden C, Vernon SE. Processing radical prostatectomies: an alternate-slice method is comparable with total embedding. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2012;16:284–7.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Avery K, Donovan J, Peters T, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322–30.PubMedCrossRef Avery K, Donovan J, Peters T, et al. ICIQ: a brief and robust measure for evaluating the symptoms and impact of urinary incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 2004;23:322–30.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. EORTC-QLQ-C30 versie 3.0 vragenlijst. Copyright 1995. Beschikbaar via: http://groups.eortc.be/ qol/eortc-qlq-c30. Geraadpleegd oktober 2012. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. EORTC-QLQ-C30 versie 3.0 vragenlijst. Copyright 1995. Beschikbaar via: http://​groups.​eortc.​be/​ qol/eortc-qlq-c30. Geraadpleegd oktober 2012.
24.
go back to reference Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54:785–93.PubMedCrossRef Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L, et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2008;54:785–93.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Klein EA, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. J Urol. 2008;179:2212–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Klein EA, Bianco FJ, Serio AM, et al. Surgeon experience is strongly associated with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for all preoperative risk categories. J Urol. 2008;179:2212–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE, et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4742–9.PubMed Zorn KC, Wille MA, Thong AE, et al. Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies. Can J Urol. 2009;16:4742–9.PubMed
27.
go back to reference Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;180:820–8.PubMedCrossRef Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;180:820–8.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, et al. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med. 2011;8(5):1503–12.PubMedCrossRef Asimakopoulos AD, Pereira Fraga CT, Annino F, et al. Randomized comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. J Sex Med. 2011;8(5):1503–12.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, non- randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009;104:534–9.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S, et al. A prospective, non- randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int. 2009;104:534–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, et al. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;74(3):619–23.PubMedCrossRef Shikanov SA, Zorn KC, Zagaja GP, et al. Trifecta outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology. 2009;74(3):619–23.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, et al. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: Trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol. 2011;June 28. Xylinas E, Durand X, Ploussard G, et al. Evaluation of combined oncologic and functional outcomes after robotic-assisted laparoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: Trifecta rate of achieving continence, potency and cancer control. Urol Oncol. 2011;June 28.
32.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):541–8.PubMedCrossRef Ficarra V, Sooriakumaran P, Novara G, et al. Systematic review of methods for reporting combined outcomes after radical prostatectomy and proposal of a novel system: the survival, continence, and potency (SCP) classification. Eur Urol. 2012;61(3):541–8.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Kang D, Hardee M, Fesperman S, et al. Evaluating the evidence: quality of reporting of studies on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2008;179:494.CrossRef Kang D, Hardee M, Fesperman S, et al. Evaluating the evidence: quality of reporting of studies on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol. 2008;179:494.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting - The learning curve and beyond: Initial 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;174:269.PubMedCrossRef Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting - The learning curve and beyond: Initial 200 cases. J Urol. 2005;174:269.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2006;49:866.PubMedCrossRef Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, et al. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2006;49:866.PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168:945–9.PubMedCrossRef Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol. 2002;168:945–9.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–41.PubMedCrossRef Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, et al. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–41.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int. 2010;106:378–84.PubMedCrossRef Doumerc N, Yuen C, Savdie R, et al. Should experienced open prostatic surgeons convert to robotic surgery? The real learning curve for one surgeon over 3 years. BJU Int. 2010;106:378–84.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Hong YM, Sutherland DE, Linder B, et al. ’Learning curve’ may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;Mar;24(3):473–7.PubMedCrossRef Hong YM, Sutherland DE, Linder B, et al. ’Learning curve’ may not be enough: assessing the oncological experience curve for robotic radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2010;Mar;24(3):473–7.PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urol. 2009;73:127–33.PubMedCrossRef Jaffe J, Castellucci S, Cathelineau X, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a single-institutions learning curve. Urol. 2009;73:127–33.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Kwon EO, Bautista TC, Jung H, et al. Impact of robotic training on surgical and pathologic outcomes during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;76:363–8.PubMedCrossRef Kwon EO, Bautista TC, Jung H, et al. Impact of robotic training on surgical and pathologic outcomes during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology. 2010;76:363–8.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, et al. Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Sep;63(3):191–8.PubMed Sooriakumaran P, John M, Wiklund P, et al. Learning curve for robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study of 3794 patients. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2011 Sep;63(3):191–8.PubMed
43.
go back to reference Schrier B, Oddens J. Robotchirurgie beter bij prostatectomie. Medisch Contact. 2012;67(9):515–8. Schrier B, Oddens J. Robotchirurgie beter bij prostatectomie. Medisch Contact. 2012;67(9):515–8.
44.
go back to reference Silberstein JL, Su D, Glickman L, et al. A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons. BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):206–12.PubMedCrossRef Silberstein JL, Su D, Glickman L, et al. A case-mix-adjusted comparison of early oncological outcomes of open and robotic prostatectomy performed by experienced high volume surgeons. BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):206–12.PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Fontenot PA, Mansour AM. Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization. BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8): E290–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11640.x. Epub 2013 Mar 14. Fontenot PA, Mansour AM. Reporting positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: time for standardization. BJU Int. 2013 Jun;111(8): E290–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11640.x. Epub 2013 Mar 14.
46.
go back to reference Philippou P, Waine E, Rowe E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon. J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002–8.PubMedCrossRef Philippou P, Waine E, Rowe E. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open: comparison of the learning curve of a single surgeon. J Endourol. 2012 Aug;26(8):1002–8.PubMedCrossRef
Metagegevens
Titel
Perioperatieve, oncologische en functionele leercurves van robotgeassisteerde laparoscopische radicale prostatectomie (RALP) in een hoogvolumeziekenhuis
Auteurs
Drs. E.R.P. Collette
Dr. M. Kliffen
Dr. D. van den Ouden
Drs. R.P. Engel
Drs. O.S. Klaver
Publicatiedatum
01-12-2013
Uitgeverij
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
Gepubliceerd in
Tijdschrift voor Urologie / Uitgave 8/2013
Print ISSN: 2211-3037
Elektronisch ISSN: 2211-4718
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13629-013-0112-y

Andere artikelen Uitgave 8/2013

Tijdschrift voor Urologie 8/2013 Naar de uitgave

EditorialNotes

Editorial