Top

Gepubliceerd in:

07-12-2018 | Original Article

Perceived duration of auditory oddballs: test of a novel pitch-window hypothesis

Auteurs: Elisa Kim Fromboluti, J. Devin McAuley

Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research | Uitgave 4/2020

Abstract

Unexpected oddball stimuli embedded within a series of otherwise identical standard stimuli tend to be overestimated in duration. The present study tested a pitch-window explanation of the auditory oddball effect on perceived duration in two experiments. For both experiments, participants listened to isochronous sequences consisting of a series of 400 Hz fixed-duration standard tones with an embedded oddball tone that differed in pitch and judged whether the variable-duration oddball was shorter or longer than the standard. Participants were randomly assigned to either a wide or narrow pitch-window condition, in which an anchor oddball was presented with high likelihood at either a far pitch (850 Hz) or a near pitch (550 Hz), respectively. In both pitch-window conditions, probe oddballs were presented with low likelihood at pitches that were either within or outside the frequency range established by the standard and anchor tones. Identical 700 Hz probe oddballs were perceived to be shorter in duration in the wide pitch-window condition than in the narrow pitch-window condition (Experiments 1 and 2), even when matching the overall frequency range of oddballs across conditions (Experiment 2). Results support the proposed pitch-window hypothesis, but are inconsistent with both enhanced processing and predictive coding accounts of the oddball effect.

vorige artikel Short-term upper-limb immobilization alters peripersonal space representation

volgende artikel Thinner than yourself: self-serving bias in body size estimation

Alleen toegankelijk voor geautoriseerde gebruikers

Barnes, R., & Jones, M. R. (2000). Expectancy, attention, and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(3), 254–311.PubMed

Bendixen, A., Grimm, S., & Schröger, E. (2005). Human auditory event-related potentials predict duration judgments. Neuroscience Letters, 383(3), 284–288.PubMed

Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., Schütt, E., & Ulrich, R. (2018). Stimulus expectation prolongs rather than shortens perceived duration: Evidence from self-generated expectations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000433.CrossRefPubMed

Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2014). Duration perception of visual and auditory oddball stimuli: Does judgment task modulate the temporal oddball effect? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76(3), 814–828.

Birngruber, T., Schröter, H., & Ulrich, R. (2015). Introducing a control condition in the classic oddball paradigm: Oddballs are overestimated in duration not only because of their oddness. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77(5), 1737–1749.

Block, R. A., Hancock, P. A., & Zakay, D. (2010). How cognitive load affects duration judgments: A meta-analytic review. Acta Psychologica, 134(3), 330–343.PubMed

Brown, S. W. (1985). Time perception and attention: The effects of prospective versus retrospective paradigms and task demands on perceived duration. Perception & Psychophysics, 38(2), 115–124.

Brown, S. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(7), 1118–1140.

Brown, S. W., & Boltz, M. G. (2002). Attentional processes in time perception: effects of mental workload and event structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(3), 600.PubMed

Burle, B., & Casini, L. (2001). Dissociation between activation and attention effects in time estimation: implications for internal clock models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 195.PubMed

Cai, M. B., Eagleman, D. M., & Ma, W. J. (2015). Perceived duration is reduced by repetition but not by high-level expectation. Journal of Vision, 15(13), 19–19.PubMedPubMedCentral

Church, R. M. (1984). Properties of the internal clock. Annals of the New York Academy of sciences, 423(1), 566–582.PubMed

Ernst, B., Reichard, S. M., Riepl, R. F., Steinhauser, R., Zimmermann, S. F., & Steinhauser, M. (2017). The P3 and the subjective experience of time. Neuropsychologia, 103, 12–19.PubMed

Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing. Psychological Review, 84(3), 279.

Gibbon, J., Church, R. M., & Meck, W. H. (1984). Scalar timing in memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 423(1), 52–77.PubMed

Hamilton, M. A., Russo, R. C., & Thurston, R. V. (1977). Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in toxicity bioassays. Environmental Science & Technology, 11(7), 714–719.

Hamilton, M. A., Russo, R. C., & Thurston, R. V. (1978). Trimmed Spearman-Karber method for estimating median lethal concentrations in bioassays. Environmental Science & Technology, 12(4), 417–417.

Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values of d′. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 27(1), 46–51.

Helson, H. (1964). Adaptation-level theory: an experimental and systematic approach to behavior. New York: Harper and Row.

Herrmann, B., Henry, M. J., Fromboluti, E. K., McAuley, J. D., & Obleser, J. (2015). Statistical context shapes stimulus-specific adaptation in human auditory cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 113(7), 2582. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00634.2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Jones, M. R. (1976). Time, our lost dimension: toward a new theory of perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Review, 83(5), 323.PubMed

Jones, M. R., & Boltz, M. G. (1989). Dynamic attending and responses to time. Psychological Review, 96(3), 459.PubMed

Jones, M. R., Johnston, H. M., & Puente, J. (2006). Effects of auditory pattern structure on anticipatory and reactive attending. Cognitive Psychology, 53(1), 59–96.PubMed

Jones, M. R., Moynihan, H., MacKenzie, N., & Puente, J. (2002). Temporal aspects of stimulus-driven attending in dynamic arrays. Psychological Science, 13(4), 313–319.PubMed

Kim, E., & McAuley, J. D. (2013). Effects of pitch distance and likelihood on the perceived duration of deviant auditory events. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75(7), 1547–1558.

Large, E. W., & Jones, M. R. (1999). The dynamics of attending: how people track time-varying events. Psychological Review, 106(1), 119–159.

Lejeune, H. (1998). Switching or gating? The attentional challenge in cognitive models of psychological time. Behavioural Processes, 44(2), 127–145.PubMed

Lin, Y.-J., & Shimojo, S. (2017). Triple dissociation of duration perception regulating mechanisms: Top-down attention is inherent. PLoS One, 12(8), e0182639.PubMedPubMedCentral

Macar, F., Grondin, S., & Casini, L. (1994). Controlled attention sharing influences time estimation. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 673–686.

Macar, F., Vidal, F., & Casini, L. (1999). The supplementary motor area in motor and sensory timing: evidence from slow brain potential changes. Experimental Brain Research, 125(3), 271–280.PubMed

Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection Theory: A User’s Guide. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Matthews, W. J. (2011). Stimulus repetition and the perception of time: The effects of prior exposure on temporal discrimination, judgment, and production. PLoS One, 6(5), e19815.PubMedPubMedCentral

Matthews, W. J. (2015). Time perception: The surprising effects of surprising stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(1), 172.

Matthews, W. J., & Gheorghiu, A. I. (2016). Repetition, expectation, and the perception of time. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 8, 110–116.

Matthews, W. J., & Meck, W. H. (2016). Temporal cognition: Connecting subjective time to perception, attention, and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 142(8), 865.PubMed

McAuley, J. D., & Fromboluti, E. K. (2014). Attentional entrainment and perceived event duration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 369(1658), 20130401.PubMed

McAuley, J. D., & Jones, M. R. (2003). Modeling effects of rhythmic context on perceived duration: a comparison of interval and entrainment approaches to short-interval timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(6), 1102.PubMed

Meck, W. H. (1983). Selective adjustment of the speed of internal clock and memory processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9(2), 171.PubMed

Miller, J., & Ulrich, R. (2004). A computer program for Spearman-Kärber and probit analysis of psychometric function data. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 11–16.

Nazari, M. A., Ebneabbasi, A., Jalalkamali, H., & Grondin, S. (2018). Time dilation caused by oddball serial position and pitch deviancy: A comparison of musicians and nonmusicians. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35(4), 425–436.

New, J. J., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Subjective time dilation: spatially local, object-based, or a global visual experience? Journal of Vision, 9(2), 4–4.PubMed

Ng, K. K., Tobin, S., & Penney, T. B. (2011). Temporal accumulation and decision processes in the duration bisection task revealed by contingent negative variation. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 5, 77.PubMedPubMedCentral

Parducci, A., Perrett, D. S., & Marsh, H. W. (1969). Assimilation and contrast as range-frequency effects of anchors. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81(2), 281.PubMed

Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. (2007). The effect of predictability on subjective duration. PLoS One, 2(11), e1264.PubMedPubMedCentral

Pariyadath, V., & Eagleman, D. M. (2012). Subjective duration distortions mirror neural repetition suppression. PLoS One, 7(12), e49362.PubMedPubMedCentral

Schindel, R., Rowlands, J., & Arnold, D. H. (2011). The oddball effect: Perceived duration and predictive coding. Journal of Vision, 11(2), 17–17.PubMed

Seifried, T., & Ulrich, R. (2010). Does the asymmetry effect inflate the temporal expansion of odd stimuli? Psychological Research PRPF, 74(1), 90–98.

Stone, B. R. (2015) TSK R package (Version 1.2) [R package]. Retrieved from https://github.com/brsr/tsk.

Treisman, M. (1963). Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the” internal clock”. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 77(13), 1.

Tse, P. U., Intriligator, J., Rivest, J., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). Attention and the subjective expansion of time. Perception & Psychophysics, 66(7), 1171–1189.

Ulrich, R., Nitschke, J., & Rammsayer, T. (2006). Perceived duration of expected and unexpected stimuli. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 70(2), 77–87.PubMed

van Wassenhove, V., Buonomano, D. V., Shimojo, S., & Shams, L. (2008). Distortions of subjective time perception within and across senses. PLoS One, 3(1), e1437.PubMedPubMedCentral

van Wassenhove, V., & Lecoutre, L. (2015). Duration estimation entails predicting when. NeuroImage, 106, 272–283.PubMed

Zakay, D. (1998). Attention allocation policy influences prospective timing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(1), 114–118.

Zakay, D., & Block, R. A. (1997). Temporal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(1), 12–16.

Zakay, D., Nitzan, D., & Glicksohn, J. (1983). The influence of task difficulty and external tempo on subjective time estimation. Perception & Psychophysics, 34(5), 451–456.

Titel: Perceived duration of auditory oddballs: test of a novel pitch-window hypothesis
Auteurs: Elisa Kim Fromboluti
J. Devin McAuley
Publicatiedatum: 07-12-2018
Uitgeverij: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Gepubliceerd in: Psychological Research / Uitgave 4/2020
Print ISSN: 0340-0727
Elektronisch ISSN: 1430-2772
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-1124-2

Bohn Stafleu van Loghum

Deel dit onderdeel of sectie (kopieer de link)

Abstract

Log in om toegang te krijgen

Andere artikelen Uitgave 4/2020

Thinner than yourself: self-serving bias in body size estimation

Sleep and mindfulness meditation as they relate to false memory

Social inclusion, but not exclusion, delays attentional disengagement from direct gaze

Explicit knowledge of sensory non-redundancy can reduce the strength of multisensory integration

Attention scaling modulates the effective capacity of visual sensory memory

Not scene learning, but attentional processing is superior in team sport athletes and action video game players