Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
Many victimized youngsters are at risk of developing internalizing problems, and this risk seems to be especially pronounced when they are genetically vulnerable for these problems. It is unclear, however, whether protective features of the school environment such as anti-bullying classroom policies and teacher’s perceived self-efficacy in handling bullying situations can mitigate these negative outcomes. Using a genetically informed design based on twins, this study examined the potential moderating role of classroom anti-bullying policies and teachers’ perceived self-efficacy in handling bullying situations in regard to the additive and interactive effects of peer victimization and genetic vulnerability on anxiety symptoms. To this end, 208 monozygotic and same-sex dizygotic twins (120 girls) rated their level of anxiety and peer victimization in grade 6 (mean age = 12.1 years, SD = 2.8). Teachers rated their self-efficacy in handling bullying situations and the extent of anti-bullying classroom policies. Multilevel regressions revealed triple interactions showing that genetic disposition for anxiety predicted actual anxiety for twins who were highly victimized by their peers, but only when their teachers had low perceived self-efficacy in handling bullying situations or when anti-bullying classroom rules were absent or rarely enforced. In contrast, for victimized youth with teachers who perceive themselves as effective or in classrooms where anti-bullying classroom policies were strongly enforced, genetic disposition for anxiety was not associated with actual anxiety symptoms. Anti-bullying programs should continue to promote teachers’ involvement, as well as the enforcement of anti-bullying classroom policies, in order to diminish peer victimization and its related consequences.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Berndt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Developmental Psychology, 15, 608–616. CrossRef
Bradshaw, C. P., Sawyer, A. L., & O’Brennan, L. M. (2007). Bullying and peer victimization at school: perceptual differences between students and school staff. School Psychology Review, 36(3), 361–382.
Brendgen, M., Girard, A., Vitaro, F., Dionne, G., & Boivin, M. (2014). The dark side of friends: a genetically informed study of victimization within early adolescents’ friendships. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.873984.
Brendgen, M., Vitaro, F., & Girard, A. (2011). Evaluating gene-environment interplay. In B. Laursen, T. Little, & N. Card (Eds.), Handbook of developmental research methods.Guilford Publications.
Costello, E. J., Egger, H. L., Copeland, W., Erkanli, A., & Angold, A. (2011). The developmental epidemiology of anxiety disorders: phenomenology, prevalence, and comorbidity. In W. K. Silverman & A. P. Field (Eds.), Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Craig, W. M. W. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 123–130. CrossRef
Dedousis-Wallace, A., Shute, R., Varlow, M., Murrihy, R., & Kidman, T. (2013). Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2013.785385.
Falconer, D. S. (1989). Introduction to quantitative genetics. Essex: Longman Scientific and Technical.
Farrington, D. P., & Ttofi, M. M. (2009). School-based programs to reduce bullying and victimization. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 6, 1–147.
Fekkes, M., Pijpers, F. I. M., & Verloove-Vanhorick, S. P. (2006). Effects of antibullying school program on bullying and health complaints. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 160, 638–644. CrossRef
Corporation, I. B. M. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows. (22.0 ed.). Armonk: IBM Corp.
Kovacs, M. (1992). Children’s Depression Inventory (CDI). New York: Multi-Health Systems.
Oldenburg, B., Duijn, M., Sentse, M., Huitsing, G., Ploeg, R., Salmivalli, C., et al. (2014). Teacher characteristics and peer victimization in elementary schools: a classroom-level perspective. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9847-4.
Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying in schools: what we know and what we can do. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Reijntjes, A., Kamphuis, J. H., Prinzie, P., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Peer victimization and internalizing problems in children: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Child Abuse & Neglect, 34(4), 244–252. CrossRef
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (2008). The Revised Children’s Manifest Anxiety Scale, Second version (RCMAS-2). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
Saarento, S., Boulton, A., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). Reducing bullying and victimization: student- and classroom-level mechanisms of change. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. doi: 10.1007/s10802-013-9841-x.
SantéQuébec, Jetté, M., Desrosiers, H., & Tremblay, R. E. (1998). “In 2001…I’ll be 5 years old!” Survey of 5-month old infants. Preliminary report of the Longitudinal Study of Child Development in Québec. Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec.
Scarr, S., & McCartney, K. (1983). How people make their own environments: a theory of genotype-environment effects. Child Development, 54(2), 424–435. PubMed
Schafer, J. L., & Olsen, M. K. (1998). Multiple imputation for multivariate missing-data problems: a data analyst’s perspective. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33, 545–571. CrossRef
Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: a synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33(4), 547–560.
Spitz, E., Carlier, M., Vacher-Lavenu, M. C., Reed, T., Moutier, R., Busnel, M. C., et al. (1996). Long-term effect of prenatal heterogeneity among monozygotes. Cahiers de psychologie cognitive, 15(3), 283–308.
Sugden, K., Arseneault, L., Harrington, H., Moffitt, T. E., Williams, B., & Caspi, A. (2010). The serotonin transporter gene moderates the development of emotional problems among children following bullying victimization. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 49(8), 830–840. CrossRef
Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Huitsing, G., Sainio, M., & Salmivalli, C. (2014). The role of teachers in bullying: the relation between antibullying attitudes, efficacy, and efforts to reduce bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology. doi: 10.1037/a0036110.
Woods, S., & Wolke, D. (2003). Does the content of anti-bullying policies inform us about the prevalence of direct and relational bullying behaviour in primary schools? Educational Psychology, 23(4).
Zahn-Waxler, C., Klimes-Dougan, B., & Slattery, M. J. (2000). Internalizing problems of childhood and adolescence: prospects, pitfalls, and progress in understanding the development of anxiety and depression. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 443–466. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400003102. PubMedCrossRef
- Peer Victimization and Anxiety in Genetically Vulnerable Youth: The Protective Roles of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Anti-Bullying Classroom Rules
- Springer US