Swipe om te navigeren naar een ander artikel
This research examined deviant talk during summer residential treatment using peer nominations and extensive field observations. Participants were 239 youth (M age = 12.62, SD = 2.60; 67% male), nested in 26 treatment groups. Deviant talk was present in this setting, showed individual differences, and increased over time, especially for younger boys. As expected, its relationship to treatment response was moderated by peer behavior. Initial levels of individual deviant talk were related to clinical improvement, but primarily when peer deviant talk was low. Initial levels of peer deviant talk were related to higher than expected end of treatment aggression, especially for youth who were high in deviant talk. Deviant talk effects were observed for staff impressions of change and observations of aggression and adjustment. Initial antisocial behavior affected whether individual or peer levels of deviant talk more heavily influenced treatment response. Implications for clinical assessment and treatment monitoring are discussed.
Log in om toegang te krijgen
Met onderstaand(e) abonnement(en) heeft u direct toegang:
Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms & profiles. Burlington: Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families, University of Vermont.
Cardoos, S. L., Zakriski, A. L., Wright, J. C., & Parad, H. W. (2009, April). Deviant talk in residential treatment: Individual and group influences. Poster presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research on Child Development, Denver, CO.
Cillessen, A. H. N. (2009). Sociometric methods. In K. H. Rubin, W. M. Bukowski, & B. Laursen (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 82–99). New York: Guilford.
Connor, D. F., Doerfler, L. A., Toscano, P. F., Volungis, A. M., & Steingard, R. J. (2004). Characteristics of children and adolescents admitted to a residential treatment center. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 13(4), 497–510. CrossRef
Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710–722.
Dishion, T. J., Dodge, K. A., & Lansford, J. E. (2006). Findings and recommendations: A blueprint to minimize deviant peer influence in youth interventions and programs. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions (pp. 366–394). New York: Guilford.
Dodge, K. A., & Sherrill, M. R. (2006). Deviant peer group effects in youth mental health interventions. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford.
Frankfort-Howard, R., & Romm, S. (2002). Outcomes of residential treatment of antisocial youth: development of or cessation from adult antisocial behavior. Residential Treatment for Children & Youth, 19(3), 53–70. CrossRef
Frensch, K. M., & Cameron, G. (2002). Treatment of choice or a last resort? A review of residential mental health placements for children and youth. Child & Youth Care Forum, 31(5), 307–339. CrossRef
Guy, W. (1976). Assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Washington: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.
Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623–641.
Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analyses: Techniques and applications. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Lavallee, K. L., Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., & the Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2005). The impact of first-grade “Friendship Group” experiences on child social outcomes in the Fast Track Program. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 307–324. doi: 10.1007/s10802-005-3567-3. PubMedCrossRef
Lipsey, M. (2006). The effects of community-based group treatment for delinquency: A meta-analytic search for cross-study generalizations. In K. A. Dodge, T. J. Dishion, & J. E. Lansford (Eds.), Deviant peer influences in programs for youth: Problems and solutions. New York: Guilford.
Luke, D. A. (2004). Multilevel modeling. Quantitative applications in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
McCurdy, B. L., & McIntyre, E. K. (2004). ‘And what about residential…?’ Re-conceptualizing residential treatment as a stop-gap service for youth with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Interventions, 19, 137–158. CrossRef
Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer. CrossRef
Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Snyder, J., Schrepferman, L., Oeser, J., Patterson, G., Stoolmiller, M., Johnsons, K., et al. (2005). Deviancy training and association with deviant peers in young children: occurrence and contribution to early-onset conduct problems. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 397–413. doi: 10.10170S0954579405050194. PubMedCrossRef
Wright, J. C., Zakriski, A. L., & Fisher, P. A. (1996). Age differences in the correlates of perceived dominance. Social Development, 5, 24–40. CrossRef
Wright, J. C., Zakriski, A. L., & Drinkwater, M. (1999). Developmental psychopathology and the patterning of behavior and environment: distinctive situational and behavioral signatures of internalizing, externalizing, and mixed-syndrome children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 95–107. PubMedCrossRef
Zakriski, A. L., Wright, J. C., & Parad, H. W. (2006). Intensive-short term residential treatment: a contextual evaluation of the “stop-gap” model. Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter, 22(1), 6–7.
- Peer-Nominated Deviant Talk Within Residential Treatment: Individual and Group Influences on Treatment Response
Audrey L. Zakriski
Jack C. Wright
Stephanie L. Cardoos
- Springer US